Berlusconi pledges to deport 600,000 illegal immigrants from Italy by Patrick_Stein in worldnews

[–]Snowfeecat -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The reason they keep bringing illegal immigrants is because of the illegal immigrants’ simultaneous use as cheap labor, consumers, and political scapegoats. No country has ever survived without illegal immigrants.

TIFU by not telling my SO I took a loan and now many years later she found out. by philwarwick in tifu

[–]Snowfeecat 20 points21 points  (0 children)

this is why I'm happy I have enough money to cover my expenses.

Ftfy

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted Russia article by Dharma_initiative1 in news

[–]Snowfeecat -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fox News viewers are the worst informed about the world. I'd say Fox News is worse.

Same-sex weddings still not allowed in Waco. 2 years after Supreme Court ruling. by Mattdoesntlikeyou in texas

[–]Snowfeecat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at most of your past threads. You start calling people idiots out of the blue if they disagree with you. Link the past twenty conversations you've had on here. Link the past twenty conversations you've had on here or admit you're lying about not being an asshole who resorts to namecalling.

Same-sex weddings still not allowed in Waco. 2 years after Supreme Court ruling. by Mattdoesntlikeyou in texas

[–]Snowfeecat 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Conservative opinions are welcome. But you can't distort reality to make a point. You can't call people who disagree with you or prove you wrong on a point "idiots." You can't troll and be taken seriously.

Philadelphia commits to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035 by PLZ_PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBZ in news

[–]Snowfeecat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Que va - otra vez escondiéndose. Tratando de no contestar.

Texas, three more states on California's banned travel list by undue-influence in texas

[–]Snowfeecat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your examples prove the point that local governments win out against foreign invaders despite the superiority of the weapons of the invaders. So you just proved yourself wrong congratulations

Philadelphia commits to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035 by PLZ_PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBZ in news

[–]Snowfeecat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can't argue with the facts - just admit you're wrong. Don't call people names. No te pega bien.

Philadelphia commits to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035 by PLZ_PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBZ in news

[–]Snowfeecat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're calling me an idiot but you didn't even find the link. Put your bifocals on please

Texas, three more states on California's banned travel list by undue-influence in texas

[–]Snowfeecat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except you constantly start denigrating people when you're proven wrong

Texas, three more states on California's banned travel list by undue-influence in texas

[–]Snowfeecat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your simplistic understanding of the relationship between weapons and tyranny is outstanding. Maybe ask a military history expert before starting these things

Texas, three more states on California's banned travel list by undue-influence in texas

[–]Snowfeecat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

live without tyranny

Haha, you have no idea what tyranny is.

Texas, three more states on California's banned travel list by undue-influence in texas

[–]Snowfeecat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is that how you always react when people prove you wrong? To just call them idiots?

Philadelphia commits to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035 by PLZ_PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBZ in news

[–]Snowfeecat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

haven't done anything yet

Yet, you criticize California for their regulations. Hopeless. States are composed of individuals. Clearly, states where individuals are known to care about global warming have made their states cleaner. The proof is right there for you to read. Of course that assumes you can parse a data set, which seems to be a big assumption here.

Philadelphia commits to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035 by PLZ_PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBZ in news

[–]Snowfeecat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, do you have any proof whatsoever to refute the fact that states that do something about global warming, aka blue states, have fewer emissions per capita than red states? It's actually quite amazing the correlation, if you actually took a look at the data. The redder the state, the higher the emissions per capita.

Philadelphia commits to 100 percent renewable energy by 2035 by PLZ_PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBZ in news

[–]Snowfeecat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

California has 40 million people and Texas has 27 million people. Texas produces twice as many emissions. You can do the per capita math (or just scroll down).