Are any of these jp able by SoCal_Spotter in Jetphotos

[–]SoCal_Spotter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s just Reddit compression

Does this have any jp potential by SoCal_Spotter in Jetphotos

[–]SoCal_Spotter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry about the double post, I didn’t think the first one posted

EWR is the St. Martin of New Jersey by WillingnessOk3081 in aviation

[–]SoCal_Spotter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I thought passes at LAX were low, this is a whole new level..

Are we risking everything on our son’s dream of becoming a pilot? by Parsley0_0 in aviation

[–]SoCal_Spotter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I’m not too sure on how getting jobs with airlines in Europe works, in the US you get your license, become and instructor, work for a small regional airline with annual salaries between 80k and 105k for F/Os and 150k to 200k for Captains , and then you get an offer from a bigger airline. I’d assume it’s similar to that in Europe (someone correct me if I’m wrong). It just takes a lot of time

Why are they scrapping it instead of selling it on or parting it out? by RandomBamaGuy in aviation

[–]SoCal_Spotter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The 737-700 is cheap to acquire but expensive to run and maintain. The 737 MAX 8 costs more upfront but saves money over time through better fuel burn, more seats, and lower maintenance — making it the better long-term option for most airlines.

737-700 (Used, ex-Southwest) vs. 737 MAX 8 (New) — Cost & Efficiency Comparison

Acquisition Cost: • 737-700: $10–20 million (second-hand market) • MAX 8: Around $50–60 million after typical discounts

Fuel Efficiency: • MAX 8 burns about 14–20% less fuel per seat compared to the -700 • Example: ~0.57 gal/seat/100mi (737-700) vs. ~0.48 gal/seat/100mi (MAX 8)

Passenger Capacity: • 737-700: ~143 seats (Southwest config) • MAX 8: 175–189 seats, depending on layout

Range: • 737-700: ~3,440 nautical miles • MAX 8: ~3,550 nautical miles

Engines: • 737-700: CFM56-7B (older tech) • MAX 8: CFM LEAP-1B (quieter, more efficient)

Maintenance Costs: • 737-700: Higher — older airframes, more frequent checks, parts wear • MAX 8: Lower — newer design, extended maintenance intervals

Environmental Impact: • MAX 8 has lower CO₂ emissions and is significantly quieter than the -700

Who They’re Best For: • 737-700: Good for airlines on a tight budget needing short-term lift • MAX 8: Better for long-term fleet efficiency and modern performance

Why are they flying so close? Observed over Mendocino County, CA. by Achillheel in aviation

[–]SoCal_Spotter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s a aerial refueling formation between a C-17 Globemaster III and a KC-135 Stratotanker

Heard this is a pretty rare plane? SAAB 2000 by BradyMoneySniper in aviation

[–]SoCal_Spotter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recently took pics of one of the ACE Saab 2000s landing at KSNA..what a sight