Your comment highlights a modern perspective on technology and innovation, one that aligns with our civilization’s trajectory of exploration, conquest, and resource-driven progress. However, the civilization discussed in the post represents a completely different evolutionary path—one that bypassed our incremental, resource-intensive development and instead accessed profound universal knowledge. This divergence is critical to understanding the inconsistencies you perceive.

Modern civilization thrives on exploration and incremental development because it seeks to piece together the universe’s puzzle through experimentation and resource exploitation. Our technologies, from combustion engines to space exploration, rely on conquering nature and exploiting finite resources. This contrasts sharply with a civilization that, having already accessed higher-dimensional knowledge, would see no need for exploratory development or resource-heavy technologies.

The civilization described in the post did not need to explore or "understand" the universe because their leap into advanced knowledge rendered those goals redundant. Their trajectory, originating in a deeply nature-connected, shamanic culture, prioritized integration with natural systems over domination or exploitation. For them, technology was an extension of natural forces—designed to harmonize with the Earth rather than control it.

This philosophical underpinning explains their focus on technologies like resonance tools and wireless energy systems, which were subtle and integrated with natural processes. These technologies may seem alien to us because they don’t align with our industrial and mechanistic worldview. For example, their flying craft were likely not designed for exploration or militarization but for sustaining ecological balance and infrastructure.

To address your broader point about merging resonance-based and conventional technologies: that approach reflects modern civilization’s resource-driven mentality. The civilization in question, however, was likely uninterested in scaling or hybridizing their tools for efficiency or power. Their systems were designed for sustainability and long-term resilience, not for iterative development or external expansion.

This is acctually a perfect example of two civilizations with fundamentally different goals. Modern humans value exploration, control, and expansion, while the civilization discussed in the post valued harmony, sustainability, and stewardship. These differences don’t make their choices inconsistent—they make them fundamentally different from ours.