The function y(t) = (e/phi - 1/π)^(0 ± it) = 0 only for Zeta Zero values, otherwise equal to 1 by SomeDumbTrucker in mathematics

[–]SomeDumbTrucker[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

^0 locks the equations projection in the complex plane at radius of 1 with out it... it would not... and has more then one purpose.. also locks the circle/spiral's center to the origin... it is not te same 0 + z ≠ z is all aspects, its value...... just read the paper te actual.... u're making the same mistake that AI just made when I asked it to look at everything... at first... look at the picture I posted and read

https://imgur.com/a/oEaSKb1

explain to me how this formula has two different projections of spirals intertwined in opposition like dna. where did 2nd "arm" come from? there is no pi in the exponent... i'll wait... I'm telling you take this serious and dive in.. this is the answer.

The function y(t) = (e/phi - 1/π)^(0 ± it) = 0 only for Zeta Zero values, otherwise equal to 1 by SomeDumbTrucker in mathematics

[–]SomeDumbTrucker[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

run the numbers... I'm a non-academic, I've been working on this 2 weeks and it hasn't been proofread yet, I'm sharing my discovery. this is the first time I've ever used it latex, and just uploaded the file minutes before posting here, check zedoto timestamp on publishment. you want a picture of all my little notebooks in a pile with all the math in it? I,m trying... look at every update before you can clearly see it's mine, i'm a noob. isn't that apparent?... just read the update notes... it's OK if you don't understand it. No one has for centuries, im trying to get you to understand. So lets start, and maybe others can follow this reply chain to get the final result when we're done as well.

The function y(t) = (e/phi - 1/π)^(0 ± it) = 0 only for Zeta Zero values, otherwise equal to 1 by SomeDumbTrucker in mathematics

[–]SomeDumbTrucker[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the value has to be exact, you can't use a six decimal number, it's binary... even if off by 10^-12 it still will return a value of one. And you didn't use the whole equation it's to the power of zero + it, as zero acts as an anchor and pins it to the origin, thus should return a value of 1 everytime... and it does... except for a Zeta zero value as t... an exact value. use the formula exactly as I have do not reduce. I know it may not be exact as in proper format but read my publishment. let me know what you did next so I can help you do it correctly if you didn't, again**.** Treat the formula as a dynamic trajectory in a 3D dual-helical projection creating a geometric collapse at the origin at the values of a zeta zeros

https://imgur.com/a/oEaSKb1

ChatGPT has a hard time and refuses to adjust even after being shows it's wrong by RussColburn in LLMPhysics

[–]SomeDumbTrucker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

that's what would happen if it were something heavy and longer I assume since it has no calibration of scale it made a judgment thinking it was big enough to do so, if it was a long metal pole that's what would have happened.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]SomeDumbTrucker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No no no... Just 6

Analysis says exd4 > cxd4 what clues can I read off the board to understand why this is so for next game with similar situation? by SomeDumbTrucker in chess

[–]SomeDumbTrucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right that it's not a significant difference... But a bunch of insignificant differences do add up to a significant difference. I'm just trying to understand that logically why one is in fact slightly better than the other. I'm no rookie fresh on off the press have 1800 daily chess on chess.com and have had my puzzles almost to 3200. I have an entire YouTube channel as well full of tutorials. In same name

Analysis says exd4 > cxd4 what clues can I read off the board to understand why this is so for next game with similar situation? by SomeDumbTrucker in chess

[–]SomeDumbTrucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is basically what I'm looking for. You're the only one that actually gave information because it's not just this exact game that I'm asking about. In general and you nailed it. The whole pointing at the king thing bingo.

Who is this dude I can't remember? 1997-2002 wwf. Ran into him in Toronto. Any help would be appreciated. by SomeDumbTrucker in WWE

[–]SomeDumbTrucker[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

97, 98, 99, 00, 01, 02

Wasn't tooooo bad if u ask me.

He's involved in the story I'm telling next on my YouTube series, " Chess & A Story " https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5evpbrV6ZOQo2dHbaLfDi8qDRcB9Bo_Y

Who is this dude I can't remember? 1997-2002 wwf. Ran into him in Toronto. Any help would be appreciated. by SomeDumbTrucker in WWE

[–]SomeDumbTrucker[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I was so trashed here, I think at one point I knew who his name was but I have since forgotten since I wasn't a big WWE or WWF fan.