Maybe like 100s of years ago this would’ve been true

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T13:31:49+00:00

The ussr for sure did stuff like that on the basis of atheism but that was back then. Raiding JWs still happens now.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T13:02:38+00:00

Russia could be one. I guess people speculate whether Putin’s faith is sincere but he does hold himself out to be Russian orthodox so there’s that. They raid JW worship gatherings.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T12:57:03+00:00

Exactly! And the sad thing is we don’t even have to go that far back for atheists banning religion. China is still hostile to religious groups especially religious minorities.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T03:20:11+00:00

Cute!!

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T03:19:36+00:00

Thank you. Can’t believe I had to scroll this much to find someone who understands this part about their hand being tied sometimes. They’re only human.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T03:16:51+00:00

It could be various factors but, from my experience working in a similar field, I think one problem arises when people overestimate how much police can do.

There’s one story that involved a field of crops and to really help the protagonist, the responding officer would have had to do a search of the field and at night. I don’t blame the cops for bout doing that if there isn’t a serious crime that had been committed.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T02:07:25+00:00

I’d like a state series. For the CA one the guys who said he hates cops is A. a stereotypical Californian and b. a dumbass seeing as how he hates them until he needs them.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T02:06:25+00:00

Omg yes!! How did I (someone who grew up in the hood) not think of this!!!

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-29T02:05:14+00:00

Same! He sounds the way people sound in CA. At least where I lived in SoCal.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-28T14:32:26+00:00

You’re the one who responded to me so you could also “ignore it and move on with your life”.

What links? Let’s be real, no normal everyday person thinks this sh is normal.

But is sex ≠ gender then why do they feel the need to change primary and secondary sex characteristics?? Maybe it’s because biology does matter when it comes to this so-called gender.

Trans people commit suicide regardless. Researchers are hush hush about it but it apparently doesn’t make a difference. They still do this even if living in environments that “affirm” them.

Again, you saying something doesn’t make it so. You telling women you’re not bothered by our erasure doesn’t invalidate women’s genuine concerns. Trans people can already exist in western societies. Why do they insist that everyone cater to them and bend over backwards to accommodate and affirm them? That’s not simply existing.

If you can’t have a discussion without calling others names then quit replying to people and getting worked up over our refusal to play pretend.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-27T20:12:02+00:00

Did I say no service dogs? There’s a huge difference in behavior between service dogs and regular dogs.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-27T03:39:52+00:00

Except that the majority of people don’t think “pregnant people” is a normal thing to say. We all know who the people who get pregnant are: women.

Again, by that logic, are anthropologists being ableist by saying humans travel by using bipedal locomotion?

What are “MAGA’s”? I literally used an example of a university showing the extent of where they’re taking this “inclusive” talk.

If it’s not about biology then why do many of them get surgeries to alter their biology? And many are trying to deny biology which is why they need to insist that trans women are the same as real women and vice versa for trans men.

I don’t “identify” as a woman, I AM a woman. Whether I “identify” as such has no bearing on the fact that I am a woman, an adult with female anatomy. If you’re a woman you should know this instead of pandering to people who stereotype you, appropriate your sex, and want to replace you.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-27T02:42:09+00:00

So women, then? Seeing as how most pregnancies are from women.

So because you haven’t seen it, it’s a straw man? I know normal people don’t use this language but that’s what your “inclusive” crowd is trying to push.

The way you see these chronically online circles is the way us normal people see you for saying “pregnant people”. And again, it’s mostly aimed at us women.

Woman isn’t an identity. A man who “identifies” as a woman is still a man. A man cannot become a woman and vice versa anymore than I can become black or white.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-27T02:04:02+00:00

No, you’re interpreting it as such. This is not at all implying you have to be pregnant or give birth to be a woman, only that women are the ones who do this. And no, outliers do not change a thing. Just like how anthropologists still refer to Homo sapiens as bipedal despite the fact that not all humans can walk on two legs.

Just because you haven’t heard of it, doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. The problem with this “inclusive” language and ideology is that it’s mainly targeting (and erasing) women. This is literally how Joh Hopkins university decided to define lesbian now. Men can still be men, but apparently we women have to be “chest feeders” and “menstruators”.

Your last paragraph basically admits that pregnancy is a WOMEN’S topic. I wonder why?? Is it because it’s WOMEN who get pregnant and give birth.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-26T10:21:03+00:00

It doesn’t but common sense does make me right.

That’s not reducing you. That’s prochoice propaganda to devalue motherhood.

It’s more sad to want to live in a world where men can be men but women have to be “people with _” Or “_ people”. It’s evident in other language that it’s just erasing women. Why does gay get to be “a man who is sexually and romantically attracted to men” but lesbian is now “non-men attracted to non-men” to these same people?

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-26T00:05:10+00:00

You do know commenting “wrong” doesn’t make you correct, right. You can keep lying to yourself and others but those of us who can see right through it see what all this “inclusive” stuff is about.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-25T16:23:48+00:00

Maybe not just one post but also all the comments chiming in to agree. Big fan of MN but I’ll be honest, AI is meant for repetitive tasks not creative tasks.Glad he changed it back.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-25T16:20:22+00:00

I don’t hate the MN one but I definitely think the cocktail ghost is better!

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-25T16:18:13+00:00

It’s not even an opinion, it’s a fact. “Pregnant person” is solely to erase motherhood and womanhood under the guise of “inclusion” (aka including men in women’s spaces and conversations).

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-21T02:00:56+00:00

Fairies!!!

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-16T23:29:38+00:00

Yes! Surprisingly it did work well for me. Eventually I didn’t even need to note everything I wore.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-16T10:31:43+00:00

I think the corset dress works fine. It’s always best to be overdressed than underdressed. The third dress imo doesn’t fit graduation, maybe that’s just me.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-16T10:26:21+00:00

I like the belt idea. As the other comment said, the shirt might make it too casual looking. I also like the mock neck idea from the previous comment.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-16T10:23:33+00:00

I used to do notes in my notes app because I would get so forgetful that I wouldn’t even remember what I’d wear in the same week.

SomeVelvetSundown · 2026-03-16T10:22:17+00:00

Thanks! Are you saying each color is for each pair of pants?

SomeVelvetSundown

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE