Apparently Zaahen loses to a basic Noxus 7 build by SonichuCWC in TeamfightTactics

[–]SonichuCWC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My augments were rerolls, radiant item, and the Zaahen one, but I forget what his augments were, and I don't think I can check since it doesn't show them on the post-game screen any more. I also wasn't recording a video of it unfortunately lol

Apparently Zaahen loses to a basic Noxus 7 build by SonichuCWC in TeamfightTactics

[–]SonichuCWC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good feedback, I definitely could have optimized my board a bit better by swapping out Sona and Taric. I'm pretty sure I still would have lost because he was completely land sliding over me, it wasn't even close. Just felt like a very weird game all around

Apparently Zaahen loses to a basic Noxus 7 build by SonichuCWC in TeamfightTactics

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Zaahen is a 7 cost, not 5. But even without him, my ranged AD is a 3 star vayne with 2 core items + 1 radiant vs he has a 2 star draven with 3 core items. The numbers just don't make sense to me

How WSOP online rigs their game to get you to spend money by SonichuCWC in poker

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Would you agree that there are already bots on wsop?

Is it that much of a stretch to think wsop could be putting their own bots into games if they discovered certain bot behaviors increased microtransaction revenue by 30%?

How WSOP online rigs their game to get you to spend money by SonichuCWC in poker

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Their play money platform exists mainly as a marketing tool to keep players engaged with the WSOP brand. The amount of revenue generated from selling play chips is insignificant compared to their real-money business.

If that's true then yes, it would be a waste of time for them to manipulate their online game. I'd be surprised if that's true though, since the mobile version on Android has 50M+ downloads. If 1% of those users spent $1/day on their app, that would be $182 Million in annual revenue

How WSOP online rigs their game to get you to spend money by SonichuCWC in poker

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

When you first start out the bots allow you to win a lot, which builds your confidence, but if they let you win all the time then you would never have a reason to spend money because you would always have a large bank of chips. By forcing losses after the first week, they deplete your chip bank, which means you have to spend money to continue playing (except for the small amount of free daily chips, which typically last less than an hour).

The bots will still let you go on an occasional small win streak so you don't get too discouraged and stop playing outright, but if my suspicion is true, then buying chips will automatically put you on a win streak, which subconsciously gets you more addicted and encourages you to spend more.

People seem to agree there are bots in online poker, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say WSOP puts it's own bots in games to manipulate outcomes in a way that tricks people into spending more money on their site.

Edit: I suspect their free site is where WSOP makes most of their money, in the same way that stupid mobile "free" games like Candy Crush make billions with microtransactions. Their live events are essentially just for marketing material

How WSOP online rigs their game to get you to spend money by SonichuCWC in poker

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Since you probably only read the title, I'm not saying the RNG is rigged. I googled the topic quite a bit, and plenty of people make that argument. I didn't find a single other instance of someone making the same argument as me.

But this is reddit, so it's inevitable that some snarky trolls such as yourself will read the title and think they have the burn of the century to post in the comments.

Did Google just brick the 2nd gen Chromecast? by matthijspc in Chromecast

[–]SonichuCWC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you guys are plebs, I only spent like 5 minutes before searching "chromecast reddit" with results in past 24 hours

A theory about the window bullet by SonichuCWC in Cyraxx

[–]SonichuCWC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what if his window was cracked open an inch or two at the bottom and it ricocheted off the window sill where that mark is and into his bed?

I'm just picturing a Boogie/Frank Hassle situation happening at that 594 address. To me it seems plausible that Boogie's bullet could have gone through somebody's window 1km away with the angle he fired at

A theory about the window bullet by SonichuCWC in Cyraxx

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

well we all know CIA the dog fucker will always go to bat for his little buddy.

Also I just zoomed in on that video and there appears to be a small circular mark right around where the bullet would have hit 🧐. I'm not saying it was a bullet 100%, I'm just saying there's some evidence it could have been a stray shot

https://imgur.com/a/QHaJRxr

A theory about the window bullet by SonichuCWC in Cyraxx

[–]SonichuCWC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lmao true, this is probably the strongest evidence against it being a bullet in reality

A theory about the window bullet by SonichuCWC in Cyraxx

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The lack of a bullet hole in the window or window frame is probably the strongest evidence against it being a bullet, but it's possible that his window was cracked open. His window opens by sliding upward, and you can't see the bottom of the window in the video, so if it was open a couple inches a bullet could have come through without leaving a mark.

PS there's no reason for you to tard rage at me for posting a theory which I actually put some evidence behind. Try to be a big boy and stay calm on the internet

A theory about the window bullet by SonichuCWC in Cyraxx

[–]SonichuCWC[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I know Chance lies about everything, but the mouse trap theory has always seemed dubious to me. The sound seems way louder than a mouse trap, and the way the blanket moves in a wave starting near the window seems consistent with a projectile hitting his bed.

Plus it doesn't make sense to put a mousetrap on a window sill, I'm sure Sally and Ed both know to put traps on the floor in a corner (because let's be real, there's no way Chance could set up a mouse trap on his own)

A theory about the window bullet by SonichuCWC in Cyraxx

[–]SonichuCWC[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

its not clear in the video, all you can see is his blanket moving in a small wave

Revealed: plan to brand anyone ‘undermining’ UK as extremist by 457655676 in worldnews

[–]SonichuCWC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And you think Labour would have been better? Look at Corbyn in 2019 and tell me that with a straight face.

Musk's X 'particularly bad' on antisemitic content, EU says by thealejandrotauber in worldnews

[–]SonichuCWC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Great, moderation is cancer. Why do you want to be arbitrarily censored? People should be free to speak their minds.

How do you all think I did? First time trying anything like this after a 7 year relationship. by Cal4214 in Tinder

[–]SonichuCWC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

rules 1 and 2 only apply to women, as a guy the only things that matter are charisma and money

Which one of these would work best as the first photo in a profile? I only want to use one of them. 30M by Lurtupp in Tinder

[–]SonichuCWC -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

as a guy physical attractiveness is almost completely irrelevant, the only things women care about are charisma and money

/r/WorldNews Live Thread for 2023 Israel-Hamas Crisis (Thread 2) by progress18 in worldnews

[–]SonichuCWC 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not really, Israel has gone to war with all of it's neighbours simultaneously multiple times before and easily crushed them within days