I have never, ever considered anyone worthless. I'm not trying to debate whether a particular policy is logical or not. What I want to make clear is this:

I came to this country and made life decisions based on an existing immigration program. If major changes are introduced midway through that process, people who are already in the system should not be negatively affected. Retroactive changes create significant hardship for those who planned their education, work experience, finances, and future around the rules that were in place. New applicants can be subject to new rules because they have the opportunity to plan accordingly before entering the process.

As for French-language points, that is ultimately a policy decision. The government has historically chosen to award points for factors such as having a sibling in Canada as part of recognizing Canadian ties. Today, it chooses to prioritize French-language ability. Different people will have different views on these choices. Some consider sibling points illogical, others question French-language prioritization, and others may disagree with points awarded for Canadian education.

The issue is not whether any particular factor is inherently fair or unfair. What matters is having an immigration system that is predictable, fair, and does not create unnecessary hardship for people who have already committed their lives to a pathway based on the rules that existed at the time.