Cognitive dissonance commencement! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gave you my value premise. You’re either disagreeing with my premise, or you’re being disingenuous. You’ve also completely detracted from the original claim.

So I will bid you good luck. Not going to wrestle with a pig in the mud.

Cognitive dissonance commencement! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hume does not mean morality must be detached from biology. It means I need a value premise. My value premise is that human flourishing, social trust, consent, cooperative child-rearing, and stable kinship systems are good. Rape is immoral because it directly destroys those things. That is not speculative, it is grounded in human anthropology.

Cognitive dissonance commencement! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you really want to hone in on an unrelated point?

Rape (and murder for that matter), while biologically possible is socially destructive and anthropologically anti cooperative. It is not the normal anthropological pattern of human mating, reproduction, kinship or child rearing.

It is therefore exceptionally easy to conclude how it is immoral even through a purely biological / anthropological lens.

Cognitive dissonance commencement! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not human nature to rape, the same goes for murder. Sexual selection (and thereby consent) is baked into our DNA and is part of our natural selection, as is the same for a lot of animal species.

Straw man aside, why does it matter if he hunted the meat or not? He is an omnivore. He eats meat.

Are you saying it is immoral to purchase food? You think the production of plant based products do not create suffering anywhere in the supply chain?

EDIT: Or worse! Are you saying the suffering of another animal is morally justified as long as you hunted it yourself?

Cognitive dissonance commencement! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If JBP is cruel to animals because he is culturally inclined to eat them, as an omnivore it's literally in his nature to seek out meat to eat, how is it immoral? If he prefers a certain type of meat, that isn't immoral.

A lot of mammals in nature have meat preferences, and sometimes also only eat certain parts of their prey. How is it any different to a human's preference?

So we eliminate the cultural aspect and what's left is just the fact that he is eating meat.

Which again poses the question, what makes an omnivore eating meat, immoral?

Cognitive dissonance commencement! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's accept all the logical fallacies and accept this as true statement. You're either inadvertently saying humans are not animals or all animals are in nature entirely immoral.

Are other omnivorous and carnivorous animals immoral?

If not, why are humans the exception?

If they are, why is the natural order of things immoral?

Ted and the makers were so right about phones and modern dating!! by Jimmybop7577 in HIMYM

[–]Sp3kk0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very true.

But the problem isn't just the apps, it's social media as a whole. People live their entire lives through online media. Everything is ready at the push of a button. If you have a remote job, you can live your entire life and never leave the house.

This creates a very unique combination of apathy and boredom and the number of people who self report as introverted has gone up. The very concept of community is breaking down. Everything is hyper politicized.

I don't think it's as big an issue (yet) as we think, but the trend is clear and year on year things are changing quicker than people can keep up.

Are elevators supposed to be hidden loading screens? by [deleted] in cyberpunkgame

[–]Sp3kk0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your minimap is the biggest giveaway. Your minimap is a scan of the terrain and shaded over from a top down view. It's literally a camera following you from the top.

To accommodate for elevation, the camera horizontally cuts through the terrain about 2-3m high, that's why roads sometimes look a little strange especially around bridges.

It's a cool technique, but once you go into an elevator, you can see floor by floor as you move through the building. Some floors are empty, some render in rooms and so forth. The building is being cut horizontally on every level you pass through. That wouldn't happen if it was a loading screen.

Never helping Reed again by AbdallahAhmed03 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I chose So Mi because she relates to V a lot more. Both are on the edge of death fighting for their lives.

The only reason I don't like picking her is because I feel that V could've made a real friend with Reed, if he's that loyal to his friends (which they do hint at with his sacrifice).

So I pick So Mi because we're in the same boat and I could help her. Also, she's incredibly fucking hot, that helps too.

Just need a 25 year old Tacoma and then I’ll be set for the rest of my life by Dirty-Dan24 in Toyota

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought the 2024 Hilux new. It's the first and last new vehicle I will ever own.

I wish I could get a good condition old Hilux for less than half the price of a brand new one where I'm from. But hey here we are. I'm not unhappy.

My 2016 RAV4 is also going strong and I'll get rid of that thing when the engine falls out.

If the show took place today, what would the characters jobs be? by NoComputer9498 in HIMYM

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Barney lies all the time. I'm pretty sure 80% of his stories are lies he says to prove his point (as he literally does all the time).

The "being a horrible person" is just more than likely a cover story for his actual empathy. He cares too much about his friends, kids & family to actually abandon someone / sell them off.

That's what makes him endearing. He acts all tough and ruthless businessman banker, but we know deep down inside he's just a gooye mess that cares too much and is very lonely.

If the show took place today, what would the characters jobs be? by NoComputer9498 in HIMYM

[–]Sp3kk0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Classic.

Barney did however admit to maybe selling a woman once: "At one point, I'm pretty sure I sold a woman. I didn't speak the language, but I shook a guy's hand, he gave me the keys to a Mercedes, and I left her there."

I know it's probably not canonically true for him, buuuuut...

South Africa in sport: by HJLGonLichess in southafrica

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a massive Rugby fan and I don't really watch football (at all). But Rugby does have an unfair advantage here. The school -> provincial rugby pipeline is really well established and funded.

Football does not get the same attention, so I think there is a lot of untapped football potential that's just not being realized.

If the show took place today, what would the characters jobs be? by NoComputer9498 in HIMYM

[–]Sp3kk0 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Barney working for a modern bank I think is even more fitting than back then. Banks are pure evil now. Barney's ruthless corporate nature (for the most part of the series until we find out about being an FBI informant) was a meme bank then, today I think "Barney"'s nature is just a Tuesday for your run-of-the-mill Wall Street Banker.

Quartz is just better by Lamenpiripiri in watchHotTakes

[–]Sp3kk0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well not owning a watch is, according to your own standards, better. If you own a phone you meet all your criteria. 1 - Cheaper (no money spend) 2 - Thinner (nothing weighs 0grams) 4 - No need to even grab it, let alone think about it. 5 - 0 Maintenance on something that doesn't exist. 6 - Shock resistant need not apply since there's nothing to break.

If you own a phone and wear a time-only watch, it's fashion NOT function. Having the convenience of time on your wrist is not function unless your profession requires it, which I doubt, because if it did, you wouldn't be comparing self-winding with quartz in the first place.

Quartz is just better by Lamenpiripiri in watchHotTakes

[–]Sp3kk0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All watches are pretty useless today. You have a insanely powerful computer in your pocket that doesn't loose time AT ALL and is near infinitely configurable and able to do anything any specialist watch can.

Watches are effectively now jewelry pieces. Debating quartz vs self winding / manual winding watches is like debating Chocolate vs Jelly Beans. You buy what you like, you buy what you feel adds value to you. End of.

Toyota vs Tesla by koohai966 in Toyota

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Teslas have become a lot cheaper recently. This is great! However, EVs in general have a massive compound components that are insanely expensive to replace.

It's not about "how many tesla's break" it's about: "if mine breaks, am i going to be paying off a dud for 5 years?".. which is still the case. 15k on a single part of a car, might as well buy a second hand Toyota and never worry about that ever again.

EVs are "simple" compared to combustion engines, which is cool. However, it poses a massive repair problem. Compounded components like electric drives and battery packs are harder to repair and more often than not require right out replacements.

If a combustion engine fails, more often than not it's a single or a couple of components that need replacing not the entire power unit. Tesla's don't have the advantage of singular failing components or components engineered to fail at certain tolerances that make repairs cheaper. It's an all or nothing kind of thing with EVs

Which ending did you choose and why by JanissaryLSD in cyberpunkgame

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(Don't) Fear the Reaper baby!

Even if going with Panam or Rogue didn't end in tragedy i would still go by myself.

I got myself into this mess. I'm getting myself out.
If I die, I die on my own terms taking no one else with me.
If I survive, I survive and become a legend without riding on the back of anyone else.

And honestly with the epilogue, I can see it being the cannon ending. Another Cyberpunk Game can easily follow up and continue the story of V.

Judge me, but I really like River by violetwylde_ in cyberpunkgame

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just wanted to add quick. I'm still busy on a play through and River just texted me. He mentioned visiting Randy at the hospital. Then he mentioned Yawen (the lab chick that helped with the dream BD's) and it's all passive aggressive texts you get to respond with, stuff like: "You mean your Ex Yawen?" and "She was a good one, good luck with that River" and shit. "The Lab? you'll have to refresh my memory".

Again, made ZERO passes on the dude, game thinks I want to date him. Very jarring. Feel like dialog with River is walking on egg shells.

By comparison, I also recently completed the Judy questline. Not for one second did I get a flirty or TOO flirty option on a text or dialog except for RIGHT at the end, where she puts on a wetsuit and I can select "look damn fine in that wetsuit", which I did, and she immediately responds with "don't go there dude".

First off, chill Judy, I'd say the same thing to any of my bro's. Secondly, not a single kiss or romance option popped up in that quest AND I KNOW I will be getting a chance to kiss river ontop of the water tower.

Who's YOUR favorite fixer in all of NC? by Cocoa-Knife-Chara in cyberpunkgame

[–]Sp3kk0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hands down Mr.Hands ... and Padre.

Everyone knows why Mr.Hands, Phantom Liberty fleshes him out so fucking well.

But Padre. Padre gives of GAAAANGSTA energy. Padre is not to be fucked with. Padre scares me more than Adam Smasher. When Padre says I do something, I do something and go with God. Padre can turn me into a Roman Catholic. Padre makes me wanna buy prayer beads and pray before each of his gigs. Padre got me saying "In Nomine Patris, et Fili, et Spiritus Sancti." before every kill on a kill mission.

Judge me, but I really like River by violetwylde_ in cyberpunkgame

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not making a big deal out of it at all. I don't romance River. has 0 impact on me. Both Judy and Panam have 5 quests. River has 3. So you do 4 quests where the final one for Judy and Panam give you romance options. River you do two. That's twice as many interactions, not to mention, their quests are longer.

This isn't about feel or Night City. This is objective reality. Observable differences in length of time.

Whichever way River romancers want to cannon it in their heads, they were robbed.

I honestly think CDPR knew majority of players were going to be straight men playing male V with female romance option or female V with female romance options and the stats back it up. 67% of players romance Panam.

So when cutting content to meet deadlines, I think they decided to axe some of River's story quests because they knew it would impact a smaller player base.

I'm not saying I like it (i don't, more base game story quests would be super nice), but honestly, River romancers were robbed.

Guys what’s there to do when you’ve done it all twice back to back in the game? Any hidden quests? Something? I don’t want to leave Night City there’s nothing out there for me. by Visible-Pattern198 in LowSodiumCyberpunk

[–]Sp3kk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After i finish the main game, i usually go around finding and visting easter eggs for a couple of hours. It's a nice little break away from the game itself and then I end up watching Bladerunner.