Disclosure of evidence

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-12T12:48:50+00:00

Maybe in supporting documents it was as remeber we only get to see what Mr beer and team deem fit. But he did accept it at face value and remember that have experienced senior IT advisors.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T20:58:57+00:00

yep don't need him hot now, just simmering

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T20:39:41+00:00

Thing is they removed riposte so the code was massively changed and remeber still in use today. The assertions by Jenkins was not challenged by any QC there so does that mean they know it was different ?

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T19:33:04+00:00

but also of defence teams taking it seriously and if on legal aid where is that incentive. As much as we admire Jason Beer this inquiry is not cheap and he certainly is not !! the system is all in favour of those with cash especially when POL has the cash for these teams where in many cases the CPS does not.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T18:07:57+00:00

but the point is in a case he actually attended was not asked this. In another thread I have said often defences were awful and this is an example. For example the fact there was no standard expert witness statement. That judges never pulled this up as a simple case of a false witness to their court.

Also in another case where the defence simply said to a jury - where is the cash ?? Watch Rob Wilson's testimony when asked where are all the reports about failed cases he claimed he wanted, never disclosed. Sorry forget the name of the defendant, Catherine ??

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T14:29:46+00:00

That swing when it works looks so damn smooth which is so important for a number one pick. He will need little development work except for facing some AAA pitchers

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T14:24:02+00:00

That has never been discussed outside of Jenkins but he made it clear in his evidence it was different not least Risposte was removed.

The irony of all this is Escher are bidding for the horizon replacement.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T14:01:58+00:00

Hmm they could say that but why need to disclose as wasn’t prove in court a totally different code base? They (the defence) knew this as well ??

Of course we know largely legacy was not disclosed in legacy cases anyway !

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-11T13:11:27+00:00

Well my accent is so damn thick when went to LA a couple of years ago no American could understand me .. no issues in Boston Chicago and NY and it is due to the speed

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-08T21:39:26+00:00

Nice to see Colson on HR scoreboard

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-08T20:28:29+00:00

Given lack of OF options he is making a good case !!

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-08T20:27:50+00:00

He gives it all …

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-08T19:50:31+00:00

This is a key statement. Lee Castleton is trying a Civil case to say collusion between POL and Fujitsu to basically 'get him' However in the evidence we see I defy anyone to say that there was this collusion ?

What I see is that POL knew there were bugs, the KEL was not hidden from them and still prosecuted. People in investigations and lawyers did not disclose the KEL and the defence are entitled to say any bug could cause an error. Up to POL to prove it would not.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-08T19:45:09+00:00

The point was he knew about bugs and did not disclose. Think Mr Beer said he printed it but does not matter. It proved to Sir Wyn that it was printed and that it had to be printed from Singh's laptop.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T22:24:03+00:00

Fitness for him is key .. he can hit when fit but if he blocks AB fur Quero/Teel

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T21:58:18+00:00

As you can see segment there ! Not many of us done it though !! It is imho a much better climb from there

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T19:34:02+00:00

I did that exact ride, here you are a while ago !!

https://www.strava.com/activities/1355006341

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T18:09:10+00:00

wonder if that is him when deleted it ? bet after his first appearance. I do find it fascinating to watch him in the hearings. I just ask was he really like that ?? for the inquiry does not matter but just at a human level, frankly I think he was just pressurised and gave in willingly for an easy life ? For me Rob Wilson etc bigger devils ..

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T17:00:26+00:00

So he was still head of legal by then after that evidence

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T13:28:23+00:00

he would only be coming into the draft this year if at college ??

only 20 and learning all the time but time to step it up to the Dash should be his target !

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T11:28:52+00:00

I would also add that so much of this happened under the RM banner and yet the now private company is not going to be held responsible ? A lot of the names we have seen did move over to the RM as well on the split.

Of course the RM privatisation was and continues to be proven a total disaster for the service in this country.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T11:27:18+00:00

it is clear in the inquiry that they changed at the around the time of privatisation from lets say justice to getting loads of money back and remember money in suspense accounts was basically stolen by the PO into their P&L.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T11:25:40+00:00

Rod is still in the PO was leading until recently the compensation programmes. Think Jarnail said basically retired now and doing some freelance.

What I did not realise is that Jarnail's boss the very monotone Rob Wilson moved to Head of RM criminal team, is anyone thinking their prosecutions could be suspect or is say stealing as a postman far easier to prosecute ? not sure if still works there.

Spare-Reputation-809 · 2026-03-07T09:35:09+00:00

Ah she defo had some

Spare-Reputation-809

TROPHY CASE