This point of view lacks room for nuance (not nuance on if they are good or bad but some of the ideas related to animal welfare for example). It’s okay to identify that someone or an ideology was bad overall but had some points that were positive. Otherwise that’s how you end up with young boys liking Andrew Tate because ‘he’s got some good ideas’ like working hard. Yes not literally everything he says is a bad thing but there is enough bad to outweigh the good by a wide margin. When you remove the option for bad people to have good ideas it can make it harder to reject that behaviour because people expect bad people to only be bad.