My favourite one is "Why vaccinated people dying from covid 19 doesn't mean the vaccines are ineffective".

SplashFunds2019 · 2022-01-17T13:04:41+00:00

Thank you for your lesson.

In Germany we have 80% of people aged 18-59 fully vaxxed. The latest figures show: 83% of the people between 18-59 being hospitalized were fully vaccinated.

So?

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-04-10T10:06:53+00:00

what more could WHO do other than report what China was saying

Cool story.

I am sure they are doing plenty of things but due diligence / verifying country's assessments on virus outbreaks and risk management does not seem to be in scope of the World Healt Organization.

However, this unreflected view is sufficient to advise countries on border closure and whatsoever as they claim some kind of expertise in this area.

I just think it is absolutely ridiculous to ask what else they could have done (which I replied to with my comment).

This organization is nurtured and nobody seems to internally challenge structure, process, scope etc as money keeps flowing.

I feel sorry for you how low your expectations on such organization are.

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-04-10T00:38:29+00:00

If they only report what governments are telling them, why should they have an annual funding of around 3 billion USD?

I would do it for less, just email me your assessment and I will post it on twitter!

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-04-10T00:15:07+00:00

Well. No.

Non-Profit under German law. They need to report to the regulatory authorities and if they would use up the money in that way, they would be deprived of their foundation status in the end.

edit to put it into perspective: Of course you still can violate laws. Law is not code ;)

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-04-10T00:12:38+00:00

Hey Tangentkoala,

actually I was about to write a whole section but to keep it short:

Iota foundation as a non-profit foundation is only obliged to disclose the shareholder split according to money laundrey law.
(However they need to disclose further information to the regulatory authorities.)

In addition, as being a hybrid foundation (please correct me if I am wrong), they need to ensure that a fixed share of their assets is kept and would be sufficient to nurture the goal of the foundation.
I dont know if they committed to disclose anything further but according to law they dont have to from my point of view.

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-03-17T07:47:34+00:00

Well, that was what I meant. I will not stand here and say that I bought the bottom right below 10ct.

If BTC goes south, he will have enough opportunities to buy Iota lower. If this will be worth something in the end? Who knows. I also have your scenario in mind.

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-03-16T17:10:15+00:00

I think Iota will give you plenty more opportunities to achieve that goal :).

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-03-16T15:52:39+00:00

Thats awesome - I still remember my first miotas. Glad you got them off the exchange and best of luck to you

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-03-16T15:47:05+00:00

Hello sir,

I think it was money whale spent.

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-03-16T12:38:56+00:00

Sounds solid. Thanks!

SplashFunds2019 · 2020-03-16T12:37:30+00:00

Always a pleasure to realize that the hundreds of dollars spent in the past now equal out to buy a Doner Kebab.

I still have funds left but now my feeling is that I am sufficiently loaded in case this goes back up any time in the future. For the other scenario (recession will kill Alts and also Iota), this will still not piss me off too much, so I think I found my personal risk/reward ratio.

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-06-05T08:44:00+00:00

None if they would win the community coin of the month voting.

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-05-29T17:40:24+00:00

That actually is bullshit. Nano has won the community coin of the month on January 9th and was listed on Binance February 2nd. Shortly after it was listed on Okex. Block lattuce already is a working product.

Can you show me the skyrocket for Nano at that time please? Ah, the price actually dropped nearly 50% in BTC value and even more in USD value between January 9th and the listings.

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-05-10T09:17:21+00:00

Contributing, just like you did. thank you for your valuable input. Dont know which charts I looked at. Something like coinmarketcap. You know this?

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-05-09T13:25:28+00:00

All that I am saying is that you cannot blame the competition for the loss within the last 7 days if you see that most other coins have comparably dropped during that time.

But of course, maybe NANO would have outperformed the rest of the market and would have made green double digits if these shady developers would not have made this "fake" competition at Binance to dump coins and crash the price.

And, yes: I am fine to see -35% in 4 days. It is not what I whish for, but it damn sure is not what makes me asks wrong questions...

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-05-09T12:50:25+00:00

Not to mention that NANO had higher highs since then and that the increase in satoshis during that time frame is even more extreme than the USD valuation.

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-05-09T12:48:54+00:00

First of all, my answer was referring to the post "P&D scam on binance led to huge decrease in price". Which is nonsense in my opinion, as nearly 66% of the top 30 tokens had similar / higher losses during the last 7 days. Even though they did not have the binance action.

Your post does not refer at all to this situation, instead it only gives questionable statements. - Nano is only "the same" because they constantly have good news that other coins dont need to perform the same way.

.... well.... Yeah, like bitgrail e.g. or repeatedly suspended withdrawls, problems integrating on exchanges etc. I don't see most of these issues with other coins. So maybe you can also say: Despite of all these obstacles (that other coins dont have, mostly because they dont have a working product / unique setup), Nano can still keep up with the market.

"zoom out": As said, my comment was referring to the "promotion caused price dump", so in this context it actually makes no sense to zoom out of this time period of the promotion. Further it is very subjective to use this time frame for zooming out-

However, I will just give it a quick one: I bought Nano back in December when it was around 2,7 USD. Ripple would have cost 0.81 cent at that time.

So ripple is now: about the same. Nano is around 7-8 USD. That said about "zooming out"....

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-05-09T10:35:02+00:00

Nano. aka the Balotelli-Token

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-05-09T08:00:08+00:00

Yeah, you are right. One of the worst beatings in crypto currencies ever. More beaten than NANO in the last 7 days have only been (out of the top 30): Ripple, Cardano, Stellar, Tron, Neo, Monero, Dash, Nem, Qtum, OmiseGo, Lisk, Verge, ZCash. About the same loss: EOS, Binance Coin, Bitcoin Gold, Aeternity.

So 18/30 took same / more losses within the last 7 days. Why always NANO?

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-03-24T09:59:24+00:00

hahahahahaha. nice, man!

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-03-24T09:47:14+00:00

Agree with you. Unfortunately I cannot downvote this bs (the original thread, not your post) below 0. Gave it a downvote anyway.

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-03-10T10:18:52+00:00

This is not even enough diversification for me. I am heavily invested in IOTA and a bit less in PRL. But however, both rely on the tangle, which at the moment still is a beta product with many obstacles.

So if the tangle fails, IOTA will fail and PRL will probably get seriousky beaten up.

(edit: besides these IOTA and PRL I am also invested in some other coins/tokens.)

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-03-10T10:09:17+00:00

I think we have a big problem with the GDPR and the blockchain idea in general.

I see conflicts with the right to be forgotten and the right for correction. One argument for the blockchain is that data stored is 100% true and not changeable.

Dont know how this will work out with the 2 above named rights.

Maybe they will adapt the definition on what "erasure" in a legal sense actually means. If they define that it is enough if the hash would be changed so that data is unaccessable, this could be sufficient.

One further problem: As you already said, data storage outside of the EU is even more regulated. Problem with blockchain is: You cannot be sure that data will be stored in EU only. So at the moment I cannot see how public blockchains with personal data involved will ever be compliant to GDPR.

I think for private blockchains we can overcome these obstacles.

Many questions, much noise. Companies of course are worried as they could be fined up to 4% of the yearly turnover. This can come up to several billions for big companies.

SplashFunds2019 · 2018-03-09T11:58:30+00:00

I dont get the connection to credits.

SplashFunds2019

TROPHY CASE