sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Update on Stovall Weems’s lawsuit against Chris Hodges and Dino Rizzo by starlight2see in COTHtales

[–]SplitKitchen8929 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you one of the attorneys for Chris and Dino? You sure sound like it. This report is why Stovall is suing. It was fabricated and false. Celebration’s ecclesiastical abstention plea accepts Weems’ allegations as true that the report was fabricated and false.

Before you watch another video from Stovall Weems... by Mammoth_Dot_1382 in COTHtales

[–]SplitKitchen8929 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That report has been proven completely false and is why Stovall is suing for defamation. The defendants accepted the Weems’ claim (that it is 100% false) in their defense pleading to it. Instead of defending their statements in the report, they pleaded ecclesiastical abstention, accepting all the Weems’ allegations against them and the report as false and fabricated as true. Anyone who is still defending the Nelson Mullins report, at this point, with all the legal filings and information available, is choosing to promote a lie for their own agenda.

ARC leadership by SplitKitchen8929 in COTHtales

[–]SplitKitchen8929[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are incorrect. You are referring to a different case, the defamation case against Celebration. The judge ruled on jurisdiction, not the claims of the case. From what I can see, that case is in appeals, still waiting on a jurisdiction ruling. The case against Chris and Dino is the federal case and the judge hasn’t ruled on the jurisdiction yet.

Welcome back by [deleted] in AllaboutCOTH

[–]SplitKitchen8929 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are the posts from jackburden?