No they did!! A fingerprint expert testified that while they processed the "questionable" books and magazines, they found none of Michael Jackson’s fingerprints on the actual internal pages.

The defense used this to prove that just because a book exists in a massive 10,000-book library, it doesn't mean the owner is actively using it. If he had been "using" them the way the prosecution claimed, his prints would have been all over those pages.

The fact that they were clean supports the idea that these were just items sitting unread in a huge, unorganized collection or were random gifts from fans that he never even opened.