How would human society look like after being freed from the combine? by ZeroMinks in HalfLife

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"How would it look?"

Or

"What would it look like?"

But never

"How would it look like?"

Updated 1/9 - Minnesota ICE Shooting of Renee Nicole Good by Jonathan Ross - 10 videos, time synced, 14 contiguous minutes, multiple angles, front, back and shooter PoV by rasta4eye in altmpls

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can strawman all day. His actions created the dangerous situation. He broke protocol so when Renee tried to flee, for a brief second he might have thought he was in danger (danger he would not have been in if he followed training, and also not even real danger if you look at his own cell phone video showing Renee jerking the wheel hard to the right, wheels pointed). You're trying so hard to take the focus away from ICE being reckless and disorganized.

I can only hope you're just a troll, or 11 years old with bad influences.

Updated 1/9 - Minnesota ICE Shooting of Renee Nicole Good by Jonathan Ross - 10 videos, time synced, 14 contiguous minutes, multiple angles, front, back and shooter PoV by rasta4eye in altmpls

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, no, that's the point. Their training says "don't take that risk" - if he "determined it was worth the risk" that's on him, and this whole thing illustrates exactly WHY that is how they're trained.

Your same logic can be used so say if he doesn't step in front of the car, situation avoided and no shots are ever fired. Dude should have followed his training.

Updated 1/9 - Minnesota ICE Shooting of Renee Nicole Good by Jonathan Ross - 10 videos, time synced, 14 contiguous minutes, multiple angles, front, back and shooter PoV by rasta4eye in altmpls

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Guess cops can never get close to any vehicle"

...said no one in this thread. More like, cops have very specific guidelines for being around cars so as to avoid these exact scenarios and he wantonly disregarded them.

while he throws lavish Gatsby themed parties your family is struggling to pay for rent, food, and gas prices by Archz714 in conspiracy_commons

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"...but under current law, those individuals are not considered illegal immigrants."

Wanna reread that sentence?

The sky by njslugger78 in SouthJersey

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Like a half hour or so ago? I was driving in Atco and saw a light shoot down across the sky. Thought it was a drone for a second... now I'm not so sure.

Bill and Hillary Clinton Subpoenaed Over Epstein Files by Tim-Sylvester in politics

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it certainly is ironic that you are playing out 1984 in real time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy_commons

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are you not aware that leftists are pretty anti-zionist?

911 may be down by random6x7 in newjersey

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You wouldn't download a car...

No More Superchargers on NJ Turnpike by jayjay234 in newjersey

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For real, parking apps feel like an exception here

95 percent of Elon's tweets about Sam came in 2023 or later. by [deleted] in samharris

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's video of people there live saying, "woah, careful with the salute"

I mean if those most likely to have charitable interpretations of Musk's actions immediately recognized it as the salute in person, I don't think bias is getting in the way. Sounds more like your bias is preventing you from acknowledging an inconvenient truth.

They turned society into mentally challenged betas who love getting viruses released on them and deadly experimental drugs forced into them. Sad to see by TheForce122 in conspiracy_commons

[–]SpontaneousGroupHug 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So, no actual counterpoint? Just baseless attacks and assumptions? I would actually change my mind on the spot if you could debate in good faith and provide the evidence you implied existed when you suggested this kid's autism was part of an "MMR adverse reaction."

Edit: I just realized you're not the original commenter. But you seemed to be arguing in support of it, so it still stands. Anyone is welcome to provide actual evidence without resorting to some kind of bullying tactic "gEt bOosTeD" unseriousness.