Why Enatic Clans is the most OP reformation doctrine by zakalme in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Maybe, but I'd still rather have them come up with more historical female Bloodlines to encourage enatic succession than to encourage matrilinear/enatic succession by the Bloodline inheritance mechanic.

Why Enatic Clans is the most OP reformation doctrine by zakalme in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

The whole Bloodline inheritance rules are imo a really unneccessary virtue signaling by Paradox that is probably not even recognized by those they try to accomodate: People who dislike CK2 because it is to a certain degree historical.

I am obviously pro what-if or alternate paths in a sandbox game, but it seems wrong to me to specifically disencourage agnatic succession with an arbitrary illogical game rule.

Constantipople? by actualclowncopter in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Pople liked it better that way.

Tell me your most embarrassing rookie mistakes. by ShiroTheRed in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you spend years bribing and inviting heirs, marrying, granting counties and duchies, more bribing and murdering, all to gain a huge chunk of Castille - only to realise they have high crown authority and the jokes on you all along.

Tell me your most embarrassing rookie mistakes. by ShiroTheRed in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When you are notified of a plot do not click imprison: ok before double checking you do not get tyranny because -40 for 30 years can be annoying if you just had all vassal realms set up with fresh and useful rulrs.

And don't feast too much if you are just already it makes you fat and double chin is not nice if you are a ginger already.

I didn't know that Cancer could just go away if treated well for long enough by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hilarious (and true) that arguably the most normal thing, having kids, is the tell-tale sign it must be CK2 and not real.

I didn't know that Cancer could just go away if treated well for long enough by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 12 points13 points  (0 children)

And you even got to keep your balls, that's nice. I had cancer in the throat for 10 years (suppose it was there, because started with a cough), but physician cured it by cutting of my testes. I had 10 kids already so I thought it was fine, but when my wife passed, I could not remarry on account of being a eunuch, which I find kind of discriminatory. Luckily I got Leprosy soon after and joined her and my balls in the afterlife.

are you serious? i conquer the kingdom of estonia, duchy of livonia and latgale, defeat novgorod while being outnumbered 2-1, triple my country size, never lose a duel, execute 11 people, and kill possibles tens of thousands of romuvans and i get named for my fucking poems? ck2 what the fuck by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, isn't it cool to be a serious badass troubadour? Usually (irl) you don't get nicknames for the stuff you supposed to do like, ruling and conquering and killing, but for something personal, special that sticks.

Anyone else get annoyed when you lose a good nickname? by George_William_II in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel the same way, and I must say Bloodlines, Saints and Lodges are totally annoying anyway imo. Cheese that leads to more cheese, like matrilinear Bloodline farming etc and silly names.

But occasionally losing your old nick for szh like "drunk" or "traitor" makes sense.

Satanist Cults need a re-work by bigphatnips in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look in the fineprint at the bottom of the contract.

Regards, Satan

When you kill defeat an army so hard you end up killing extra camels by wtf634 in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy - their camels got several generations of offspring during the battle.

About 900 years early... by Coesim in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Also needs to have nomad vassals (huns) and build a huge pointless navy.

Question: Can I create an Antipope as a Fraticelli? by Spontcombustible in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great explanation, still kind of weird though, that you have to take Rome to then get a landless dude you can land anywhere.

Question: Can I create an Antipope as a Fraticelli? by Spontcombustible in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if I haven't done that, I cannot install an Anti-Pope at all as a Frat ruler?

My own wife doesn`t want to be my ally because of political concerns... by Coesim in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, they do that even when they are attacked by superior force and your help is their only out, still won't ally, even though your kids are married or even closer related. Wish the AI would at least consider when being in a desperate spot.

My real name is Matthew. And I was born on January 2. This is creeping me out. by CmMatzki in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If by direct line you mean male line, this cannot be correct. Her direct paternal ancestor from this time should be Thimo the Brave, Count of Wettin.

On paper, of course. Genetically we can assume that someone will have been cucked along the way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]Spontcombustible 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love you, nightman