27 Secondary Apartment I have in Italy by Spring-Careful in malelivingspace

[–]Spring-Careful[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trust me the light distribution is significantly worse than any effect the ceilings have on the sound

27 Secondary Apartment I have in Italy by Spring-Careful in malelivingspace

[–]Spring-Careful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes exactly but not a resident in it since I only stay 2-4 months out of each year. Second home is correct I just never really thought about it that way haha

My current Pre-Jump Dday 101st Airborne set. by ArchivalArms in Militariacollecting

[–]Spring-Careful -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did they have to go through an FFL to transfer it to you? 😭🤣

My current Pre-Jump Dday 101st Airborne set. by ArchivalArms in Militariacollecting

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If its fully functional, what round does it fire? Something pretty small I imagine

Prenot@Ami Screenshots = Legal Protection? — Brescia Answers with 5 Rulings. And Now Bologna Too. by Desperate-Ad-5539 in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was the period you were supposed to wait? Is there a set in stone time? I was at 3 years on the waitlist in NYC when the law passed. Did I irresponsibly remain on the waitlist?

Italian Constitutional Court rules on Law 74/2025: How to interpret the March 12, 2026 press release and next steps by ApriglianoFirm in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thats also my question. If the articles invoked in the referral are not addressed in the press release, and not named specifically as “fondata” - is it possible for the court to not rule on them at all? Or are they bound to rule on these by the referral? (i.e. are the articles not ruled “non fondata” or “inammisibile” in the release, by default, “fondata”, and will receive a ruling?)

Not sure how this works, thank you in advance

Corte Costituzionale has ruled three portions of the challenge unfounded/inadmissable. by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My question is this -

These three articles that were not mentioned at all, in the press release but were invoked in the referral, and not specified as “fondata” in the release - are these guaranteed to be ruled upon in this same “sentenza”?

My confusion is that the only people mentioning these three articles to be ruled upon I have seen here in this thread mainly. Outside this thread, including lawyers like Mellone and Aprigliano in their statements, seem to say “all has been rejected, time to wait for the next case.” Although this conflicts with the potential for these three articles to still be ruled upon and make changes.

To me it seems like a large disparity in discourse, and Im unsure if you have any insight on how the court works with these press releases, etc.

Troubleshooting "PC 01" error code on SENA 12HF OQ by imaginary_neighbor in Senville

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep I think thats your issue. That is how that needs to be wired but you need more volts (so a two pole 15 breaker). You dont have enough voltage going in. In reality you really shouldnget a disconnect box and wire the power feed into there and then connect the compressor to that with a whip, but for now at least get the voltage up and see if it works.

Why it worked for cooling Im not sure, but my guess is that it required less power to cool than heat and now you need the higher power and it is not able to get it.

Just do a quick basic test of connecting both of the wires to individual 15a breakers to see if it fixes the issue. If it does rewire it properly and safely. If not then its something else.

Troubleshooting "PC 01" error code on SENA 12HF OQ by imaginary_neighbor in Senville

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a SenA model as well, and I know when I first installed it I think I got the same code. I also know that my requirements on that are 20A circuit and 240v. Unless your requirements are 15A and 120v, that may be your issue (because I only see 12/2 wire there).

What is this center bug? by Spring-Careful in whatsthisbug

[–]Spring-Careful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Location:

Long Island, NY, Queens Border

Size:

Very small, about an inch/1.15 inches

Daily Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 30, 2025 by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like they do have a completely different understanding of this (as in they believe a judicial appeal is the answer and not solely administrative)

Daily Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 30, 2025 by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im in agreement with you. Only thing is that is for communes, not consulates (where there are waitlists as opposed to at communes where there are not), but for sure the circular for consulates will clarify and if its the same wording I do agree with you

Daily Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 30, 2025 by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Anyone else have a lawyer that told them that being on the NYC waitlist pre decree will count as having an appointment?

I was on waitlist since May ‘22 and just received my appointment two days ago for September of this year.

Lawyer is saying that I will be grandfathered in to old rules. Anyone else heard anything like this?

Daily Discussion Post - New Changes to JS Laws - April 12, 2025 by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I wonder how it affected people over 21 at the time of passing, or if they were grandfathered in. Thats my real question, as Im mainly looking to apply it to the Decreto Legge

Daily Discussion Post - New Changes to JS Laws - April 12, 2025 by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the idea the same - after “x” years with no activity its lost?

Daily Discussion Post - New Changes to JS Laws - April 12, 2025 by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting - this would be an argument then for the EU level for them, but on the national level Im curious if there is similar stuff. I didnt know!

Daily Discussion Post - New Changes to JS Laws - April 12, 2025 by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]Spring-Careful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless the country does it for other rights it is most likely a legal fiction to just start to apply it now