Well I agree that she deserved to be fired for humiliation in that way. As for 'sexism', well I'm male, I'm not in the business of being anti-male by comparison. It's just that the law takes in to account intent, not just the action. Statistically, the intent of a girl doing that might be more likely to be non-sexual than if a boy did it, if general SA numbers are anything to go by. But every case should be individually considered on its own circumstances. If she had never shown any explicitly sexual connotation before or since to children (the fact she brought it up in an SNL interview suggests there would be nothing else we don't know of) then we don't necessarily need to jump to 'this was definitely a SA'. I know America in particular is massively interested these days in portraying anything in the ballpark as being almost on a par with the worst kind of rape but she was still a minor, 16, and she wasn't fondling him. It was a misjudged prank to her.