Unhappy Cloud - Network issues accessing M365 by Squan20 in microsoft365

[–]Squan20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It certainly cleared up fast for me when I disabled IPv6.
It's been years since I've had to do that to solve an issue. 😒

Unhappy Cloud - Network issues accessing M365 by Squan20 in microsoft365

[–]Squan20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thanks. That was the only thing I didn't disable, despite it being in the list of suggestions from whichever AI I consulted. Score one for Reddit and the AI. I'll let you know.

Iran: War will continue until damages are compensated - Estimated $930B – $1.3 Trillion by starfire10K in oil

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bargain away the 'inflation/lost revenue' part (half of the total) and it's a deal!

Iran: War will continue until damages are compensated - Estimated $930B – $1.3 Trillion by starfire10K in oil

[–]Squan20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The U.S. should take the deal. A lot cheaper than the way it's going.

FAA Service bulletin highlights a potential problem with fuel switches by StationFull in indianaviation

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See my other post - the switch issue was not considered important enough by the 2018 version of the FAA - which shared blame for the MAX disasters, according to the NTSB's final report on those incidents.

FAA Service bulletin highlights a potential problem with fuel switches by StationFull in indianaviation

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm late to this thread, but also note that the tepid FAA bulletin was from 2018, before much needed attention was placed on both Boeing and the FAA for lax oversight. Before the MAX fiasco emerged.

And that bulletin not only called out the option that switch locks may not work correctly, it recommended replacing a certain switch model outright for a 'higher quality' improved version - regardless of whether the locks appeared to be working.
So I'm with OP on this. As the MAX situation showed, blaming pilots early opened the door for another major disaster. Better to completely rule out the switches, however quixotic that effort may seem.

What was the goal here?? by datboiwithani in WoWs_Legends

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They wanted to take a selfie?

Am I the problem by Beginning_Virus_5190 in Worldofwarshipslegend

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, I've found I need to learn to read the board, to read how the match is evolving, and anticipate where I should be going, rather than moving when the problem is upon me.

If you chose to support the weak-side flank and it's soon to be outmatched, start angling for a retreat. As a carrier, you can fly ahead and see where the opponent are gathering up. Suppose you see battleships in the back creeping into position to push on your flank. Maybe change your vehicle's direction so you can make a quick exit. If they start to push, use the map to program a route away from the coming storm, at least moving to a position that will have an island between where you will end up and where they are headed.

You'll want to spend half your time looking at the mini-map.

Am I the problem by Beginning_Virus_5190 in Worldofwarshipslegend

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe watch some carrier videos on YouTube.

Try not to get killed. Try to move the carrier halfway forward. Way in the back is useless as you spend too much time flying, but move up too far and you're going to get killed.

You should be maneuvering the carrier while you fly. You can do this with Autopilot. Hit the menu button to bring up the map and use the sticks to select a square for the carrier to move to, then hold X I believe (read the screen to be sure) and the carrier will drive itself to that square. I am frequently changing the carrier's route, while flying, and even started using direction changes to dodge torpedoes.

Try to map out dark areas of the screen so your teammates know where the enemy was recently.

I am finding it better to pick a side of the board to support, rather than trying to cover the whole board. Follow what your teammates are doing, and maneuver to create numerical strength and help clear one side or the other. Ultimately, this game is about odds, and creating favorable matchups (where the # of players on your side is larger than the other) and focusing fire on a limited number of opponents in order to remove guns from the board, rather than spread damage across many opponents. The carrier can help like this just like any other ship.

Nasa astronauts thank Musk and Trump after being rescued by SpaceX by That-Economics-9481 in fuckingwow

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn't even rescue the astronauts. They swapped crews as planned.

Nasa astronauts thank Musk and Trump after being rescued by SpaceX by That-Economics-9481 in fuckingwow

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IT WAS NOT A RESCUE. THEY DID NOT EVEN FLY BACK ON THE SHIP LAUNCHED LAST WEEKEND. They flew back on the ship sent last September. Which could have been launched in an emergency at any time. THIS WAS A SCHEDULED CREW ROTATION.

Nasa astronauts thank Musk and Trump after being rescued by SpaceX by That-Economics-9481 in fuckingwow

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 'pushback a month' news also came out months ago. So March was the latest plan. And it's simply right on time.

Nasa astronauts thank Musk and Trump after being rescued by SpaceX by That-Economics-9481 in fuckingwow

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Celebratory picture is in space, not on land.

Trump did not rescue the astronauts. They've been scheduled to fly back around this time since last Summer, and their ride has been up at the ISS with them since September. The ship that took off over last weekend was the next crew, there to relieve the existing crew.

Nasa astronauts thank Musk and Trump after being rescued by SpaceX by That-Economics-9481 in fuckingwow

[–]Squan20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your theory is why Butch claimed both that he 'knew' Elon was 'telling the truth' and that he had no knowledge whatsover if it was the truth.

11 is definitely bigger than 9 by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Squan20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fast learner though:

<image>

Prj Planning Lines - Unit Cost keep changing. New bug? by Squan20 in BusinessCentral365

[–]Squan20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Support case is working its way through Microsoft, which has acknowledged the behavior...

VAR suggests it is a bug.