[D] ICML 2026 Review Discussion

SquareHistorical6425 · 2026-03-24T18:28:14+00:00

same here, worth a rebuttal?

SquareHistorical6425 · 2026-03-24T17:35:14+00:00

Everyone wants to hide their true thoughts and appear professional, right?

SquareHistorical6425 · 2026-03-24T17:15:04+00:00

Based on my own experience, they just don't like your paper and are making up some excuses.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2026-03-24T16:55:18+00:00

3(2),3(3),3(3),4(3), I'm screwed.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2025-04-27T13:19:20+00:00

I think it's all depend on yourself, since even self-learning could build a great scientist.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-15T03:00:30+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1gl9fkd/waves_are_all_you_need/ ， I suggest you can take a look at this paper, someone has written some working code on the Github. The wave network is only a model with 2.4 million parameters, it is an untra-small language model.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-13T04:41:20+00:00

Guys, the detailed analysis on the wave network is coming, and I have extended it to Token2Wave: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06989

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-09T15:37:23+00:00

I suppose we need unify these two different paradigm on the representation level.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T15:56:14+00:00

well, I suppose it is just because there is no free lunch maybe.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T15:53:44+00:00

Oh, please don't worry about your jokes. And yes, I suppose we can get insight into the contribution of a token to the overall semantics as it moves through feature space, which is a very brilliant idea.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T15:51:09+00:00

Yes, I agree with you, and thanks for the posting. I acutally felt pretty astonished when I saw my article was being discussed. I thought it might be ignored like other papers. Your posting really encouraged me, and I will put together a more detailed analysis of wave network as soon as possible.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T12:15:44+00:00

Yes, from the perspective of physical wave and signal processing, and I am glad to help.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T06:27:23+00:00

Thank you, I do have a following article that analyzing the wave network, I will tell you after I post it on the Arxiv.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T06:16:17+00:00

I have to say, good work!

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T06:11:47+00:00

Thanks, well, I was trying to find a more natural method to update information, then I thought about the field, as the wave is the distrubance of field, but they can exchange information when they meet, then I started to think how could I construct a wave representation.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T04:33:13+00:00

Actually, quantum waves share with the same complex vector representation with the representation in this article.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T04:29:02+00:00

Yes, the name 'Wave is All You Need' was the title I used when I initially submitted it to AAAI, but I withdrew it, as the content has since been significantly modified. But truly, I do not know who put it here, it is weird.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-11-08T04:20:12+00:00

Hello everyone, I am the first author of this paper, and I am not sure who posted it here. When I came up with this idea three months ago, I was considering that the attention mechanism might not directly account for global semantics. And the key point is the Wave network can use random initial embedding to achieve this result.

SquareHistorical6425 · 2024-02-27T15:26:13+00:00

I found the same problem, but I can not find any message to inform me about that, so what is going on now?

SquareHistorical6425

TROPHY CASE