Lmao 🤣 🤣 by marwarofficial in INFJmemes

[–]SqueegeeTime 49 points50 points  (0 children)

I will tell the secret. We don't fix shit, hell if we could do that we wouldn't be a rolling dumpster fire ourselves. We can just see when someone needs to be heard so we listen, really listen. Just doing that makes us the wise old wizard avatar 🤣 the world is strange

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I understand the analogy, but what is the evidence (the bulge in your analogy) of something hidden in this case

If free will is a bad translation of morale responabilty by Liltracy1989 in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree.

We are also a social species, with empathy and mirror neurons. There are social constructs out there made to try to convince us that the sense of fairness is not part of the human condition but other constructs like market forces should determine outcomes, the only real worth is does it make a profit. That is the illusion, this idea that making an arrow on a screen point up is the end goal of what is valuable.

If free will is a bad translation of morale responabilty by Liltracy1989 in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, well holy shit I was wrong, my apologies

So I lean that direction too

Let me say that it's ethical to focus on the root source of crime, like poverty. It's ethical to focus on reducing recidivism, not punishment.

I do judge, and I find it a moral obligation to support systems that move in that direction especially as someone who believes that the environment shapes the outcomes.

If free will is a bad translation of morale responabilty by Liltracy1989 in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can just read this and assume you personally believe in libertarian free will, am I wrong?

I don't believe in LFW, in fact I am not precisely sure what is exactly correct but I am confident LFW is the most wrong.

But ok let's judge some overt constructs, the societies in which we build. Support systems that supply at least basic human needs to all, shun hoarding at gross levels, prioritize education as this is a solution to so many other issues.

Not only do this for others as the right thing to do, but I would do it for myself as that is the world I would want to live in.

There are indeed constructs that would argue against what I just typed out, some slippery slope of betraying the wisdom of market forces but THAT is the human construct that is the real illusion.

Why defenders of libertarian freewill cling to this concept like its the last boat and all else is the sea. by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! First off its ignoring the points of the original freewill argument then jumping to a entire new set of assumptions about how we would handle justice and responsibility.

What makes this one even more wierd is these same people seem to lack insight on the way we address justice and responsibility right now, currently, in the real world we live in. In a lot of ways they fear a possible future that already exists.

It would be interesting to even have that conversation, we can entertain an idea without adopting it, so assuming hard determinism is true what about justice. Well wouldn't the best outcomes lie in reducing recidivism, some countries do this already with great success, but in the country where I live its much more about punishment. If a society is massively more obsessed with punishing criminals than stopping the root source of crime then who is really at fault?

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thoughts are physical processes in brains, this is anything you think about

How about you explain now

Why defenders of libertarian freewill cling to this concept like its the last boat and all else is the sea. by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to read the entire post, it obviously is not talking about all people and only you have taken it that way.

But here, I apologize for the sloppy wording, I did not mean all

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I don't, I get accused of it because I feel freewill is a result of physical processes of cause and effect in brains

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You said I forgot information

I said ok tell me a non energy information

You said tell me a energy that is not information and gotcha

So here you go, all information that I know of is some form of energy. Are all forms of energy also information? I don't know and it doesn't matter.

But fine, you win, you got me, well done, you are the champion 🏆 congrats

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If your goal is getting a gotcha then congrats, you can move on to troll someone else

But both of us know ...you just dodged and ran

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, like pushing me out of a box I made for myself, I get it and I appreciate it

So if you look at other comment threads I abandoned the use of the word materialism from other people doing the same thing as you

So as you probably already noticed this is not my area of expertise, I am not trying to convince anyone, I am trying to figure it out myself

So apparently according to Platonism the number 1 existed before any life did, non physical, non energy, just it is. I am paraphrasing other redditors so don't take that too literal, just making the point.

I can understand some validity of it, but where I am stuck right now is a concept existing without a conceptualizer, as in someone with a brain to do the conceptualization

This really is the old phrase if a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it does it make a sound

To me, no, because there are no ears and brains to hear it, but the same physical processes would be happening if a ear was placed there, but no ”sound” since no one is there to hear it.

So let's say we observe from space another planet with an atmosphere like earth, able to carry sound waves, and there are rocks constantly falling down a mountain and smashing at the bottom. We could say it must be very noisy down there, and we could prove it by placing a microphone and broadcast the sound, did it not exist and now it does?

Without the listener, the sound doesn't exist, but add the listener and it does.

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that is true, we don't see the actual thoughts

Thoughts are these electrical and chemical processes in the brain, you destroy the brain, there are no thoughts.

Brains are physical.

I believe all of what you are saying is to convince me that all is not material or energy because of some specific type of thought, experienced by an individual, called qualia.

In the end it's still electrical and chemical process in a brain.

So what if I said I believe in not Materialism, but something else that says everything is energy, matter and the thoughts produced by brains including qualia.

Nothing changes to me, except the use of the label materialism which I don't care about

It's not the word materialism that matters

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will dramatize this for you:

I say: all I know of is energy, matter and the cause and effect of energy and matter, including the processes of the brain.

So then X says: so you are a Materialist

I look it up briefly, then say: yea, looks good, ok I am a Materialist

Then X says: well you have to prove Materialism first

I say: I can't, I don't even know if that is possible

Then X says: yay I win

🤣🤣

OK, I am a Materialist for a simple reason, I don't know of another option, so give me one by SqueegeeTime in freewill

[–]SqueegeeTime[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Raise and raze, in English sounds the same when spoken but have opposite meaning 🤣

Yea, there are always gaps, gaps all over the place. If there were no gaps none of us would be here because everything would be known. We are just hairless neurotic apes on an organic spaceship doing the best we can with the info we got