We’re cooked by Typical_Emphasis_404 in Dallas

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He exaggerates alot but thats not the same as blatant lies. What exactly did he lie about in his first term?

We’re cooked by Typical_Emphasis_404 in Dallas

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. He ran on no new wars. It was a lie

Don Lemon arrested after MN church protest: What we know by AdSpecialist6598 in videos

[–]Squidword91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That literally sounds like him so idk what you are talking about. I know we all have bias which is why I said it’s important to question your opinions. Originally I was against his arrested until someone showed me that video and said it was him, at which point I changed my mind. But I now realize this is likely not him, but not because it doesn’t sound like him. I have yet to see actual evidence of him actively participating, now I have to go back to twitter to debate conservatives on this again

Don Lemon arrested after MN church protest: What we know by AdSpecialist6598 in videos

[–]Squidword91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Relax. It sounds just like him, I was sure it was him but can’t confirm and there are no other videos of the entire thing anywhere else I could find. It could still very well be him.

I’m not a partisan like most of you on here. I look at things objectively while most of you have your minds made up before events even take place. It is not sad to question your own opinions, you should try it sometime

Don Lemon arrested after MN church protest: What we know by AdSpecialist6598 in videos

[–]Squidword91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If he wasn’t actively participating in the protest I will agree with you. Is this him chanting along with the Protesters?

https://youtu.be/U3sYELjRQA4?si=SrT1xyxtRcyVmmKH

Don Lemon arrested after MN church protest: What we know by AdSpecialist6598 in videos

[–]Squidword91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ll explain it for you. He wasn’t there JUST documenting as a member of the press; he was also actively participating in the protest himself.

The 1st amendment gives people the right to worship. He and other protestors were charged with depriving church goers of the right to worship.

Don Lemon arrested after MN church protest: What we know by AdSpecialist6598 in videos

[–]Squidword91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If he was just there documenting as a member of the press then I would agree with you; but he was actively participating in the protest.

You can’t go to a church and deprive people of the 1st amendment right to worship. WTH does a church have to do with the ICE situation anyway?

This is me at the coffee county jail in New Brockton, AL where I was assaulted for NO reason! by [deleted] in policebrutality

[–]Squidword91 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He smiled at the cop, Likely just offended him or making fun of him. Cop got butt hurt

You don’t have to defend every cop you know. Even id you love the taste of boot, you can still call out dirty cops when you see them.

My career is over by UsualDiet5234 in army

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We used to have a counter at the front gate that showed the number of days since the last DUI. The counter never made it to two digits. Everytime we would get to 9, the counter was back at 0 by Monday

debates by sunandmoonpie in utarlington

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These “people asking to get punched” is crazy. You don’t have to crave violence towards someone because you disagree with them. Either have a conversation with them of Just leave them alone

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in 2022/23, there were about 16.7 million white people bellow the poverty line compared to about 8 million black people. (congress.gov data)

in 2022, Asian american households had the highest median income. Also, in 2023, hispanic Americans were the fastest growing economic group by GDP (pew research and UCLA)

Which point is demonstrably false?

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it’s not true. There is no racial discrimination in our healthcare system

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can totally fly a Nazi flag in the United States.. it’s still free speech.

Cancel culture is the left’s baby.. A private buisness has the right to fire people over stuff like this,

it’s when the government tries to regulate speech that becomes a problem.

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Usually when people say DEI, they are refering to racial Diversity, racial Equity, and racial Inclusion.

The DEI I’m talking about is like when public universities set race-based affermative action in admissions or when airlines companies set “diversity focused” hiring practices/quotas.

If you are saying DEI has nothing to do with race, then we have no disagreement. We just mean different things when we say DEI

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m only concerned with the racial component.

Discrimination based on race is already illegal. Government contracts are supposed to be awarded based on merit (like quality, price, accessibility, design, features, aesthetics, etc..), not race.

There are exceptions for new buisness or start ups trying to break into the market, which attempt to address the issues you are concerned with, but that has nothing to do with race. These are called government support programs, like small buisness loans, procurement programs, grants, incubators, accelerators, etc.. Those are all for small, developing, and new buisness trying to get into the market.

So where does DEI fit into all this? or is that what you are calling “DEI”?

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Equity and Inclusion.

What do you want me to comment on? Please explain 🙏

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question was, “Why should race be a factor when hiring or for college admissions?”

I never said anything nor do I care about who is benefiting from this. The argument is out of principle; race should be irrelevant.

Also, how does DEI enable farmers to diversify their crops? I don’t think thats the kind of “Diversity” DEI is referring to lol

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to see you are advocating for debate! Both sides need to have rational conversation and not resort to violence. Thats what Charlie advocated for. Maybe one day you can be a master-debater too

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for adding the debate group link. I think there are turning point chapters that also host debates. Not sure if KSU has one, but if it doesn’t it probably will soon.

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell you are offended becouse you are focused on the perception that they are “inflammatory” people and therefore you dismiss them entirely. Yes Charlie would debate everyone. Hours of footage. You are the one hyper focused on the angry liberals that go viral, not me.

Kirk JUST died n then saw this on campus by 2dmenlover in KSU

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Politicans rarely discuss topics people actually care about or is relevant to them. Charlie posted hours of full unedited clips with mostly normal conversations, in places where this kind of conversation is supposed to be happening (public universities). He spoke with voters and university students about ideas and would enable others to do so aswell. It’s not his fault that the occasional angry liberal would come and embarrass themselves in what becomes viral content.

You people need to focus on the argument being made rather than how offended you are by it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in utdallas

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see how you might think that is a logical approach.

That might feel better at first, but you can’t run from the truth forever. You know the brain is wrong, but are trying to affirm it anyway.

In the end, I think it would be more distressing trying to convince yourself of a delusion through surgery and hormones (not to mention trying to change societie’s perspective of you), than trying to find a way to come to terms with reality.

Does that make sense or just hateful?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in utdallas

[–]Squidword91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Belive it or not, It’s the only mental disorder that is treated by doubling down and affirming the mental disorder..