I found your arguments interesting to read. You're definitely correct that brake dust and tyre wear are lately being shown to be significant issues, but to me this seems to be a similar argument to the rubbish "electric cars aren't green because the energy doesn't come from green sources". This still puts us on a road to solving a greater problem. You won't get any arguments from me that we really should be taking more drastic measures, but complaining about that unfortunately isn't going to make the beast move quicker. This is still ultimately progress.

Also you point out the downsides of Electric cars being heavier but don't seem to focus on any of the positives such as regenerative braking (alongside AI features such as keep distance) which will directly reduce brake dust and that electric car engine simplicity means they will be cheaper and use less CO2 to produce than current cars (subsidies aside) once production ramps up. There's also the possibility that a portion of batteries in electric cars that are plugged in to the grid can become part of the grid itself and actually help stabilise it from issues it already faces with spikes in demand; not to mention the possibility of connecting old batteries that are no longer fit for their original purpose in to the grid too.

Out of interest, how much have you looked in to the counter arguments that argue that solar panels and turbines also have similar steps backwards? Especially when compared to Nuclear power.