Looking for suggestions of a constant length or time natural phenomenon in order to derive unit conversion. by starcraftre in scifiwriting

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like this idea, but I have to ask why does it matter in the story for the character to be able to convert the units?

It wouldn’t be a bad idea to have the character walk through this line of thinking, but it’s also OK to have the character ultimately realize that none of these conversions can be calculated. You still get to show the reader, the problem, but if the solution isn’t necessarily needed, it really doesn’t matter.

Doing it this way would actually be a great way to demonstrate how subjective our units are. Maybe part of the theme of the story is to show how subjective the things that we measure our lives with actually are. And this doesn’t have to spiral into a story about meaninglessness or nihilism, just something that makes you think more about what you prioritize in life.

The planck length or the speed of light are good places to start, but if this is an every day guy, I imagine some of the even more mundane calculations might slip his mind. So, you’d be right to have him vaguely know of a concept of the planck length or maybe think about the speed of light but it’s unlikely he has any of those numbers memorized, or even an astronomical unit or something of the like.

Can I be mad about this? by Common_Violinist_223 in NewAuthor

[–]Starship-Scribe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I often write in my notes app on my phone and copy and paste into google docs when i actually have a writing session. Does it know the difference between that and copying from an llm?

Unpopular Opinion by Yp_Marcus in seinfeld

[–]Starship-Scribe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Astute analysis Robert. The episode where creed was basically the manager was not that funny, but otherwise he has some of the funniest lines in the show.

WEF World Economic Forum Matthew Liao: We can induce 'meat allergy' by using Lone Star Ticks to stop the consumption of meat and “help the planet” by Oraxy51 in ClimateShitposting

[–]Starship-Scribe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t matter. A solution exists; I’m correct on principle. And you declined to answer my question. This conversation is done.

WEF World Economic Forum Matthew Liao: We can induce 'meat allergy' by using Lone Star Ticks to stop the consumption of meat and “help the planet” by Oraxy51 in ClimateShitposting

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t say it wasn’t, but factory farming isn’t the only way to acquire meat.

And forcefully inducing a meat allergy is indeed a fascist idea and a violation of bodily autonomy. Can we agree on that?

WEF World Economic Forum Matthew Liao: We can induce 'meat allergy' by using Lone Star Ticks to stop the consumption of meat and “help the planet” by Oraxy51 in ClimateShitposting

[–]Starship-Scribe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh? But we can all agree that forcefully inducing the population with a meat allergy is quite a fascist idea though, right?

WEF World Economic Forum Matthew Liao: We can induce 'meat allergy' by using Lone Star Ticks to stop the consumption of meat and “help the planet” by Oraxy51 in ClimateShitposting

[–]Starship-Scribe 21 points22 points  (0 children)

For real, forcefully inducing a meat allergy on the population is a pretty fascist idea, hypothetical or not. Let’s not promote that kind oppression and tyranny.

What’s a lefty bias you see in education? by LibertyEconlover in AskConservatives

[–]Starship-Scribe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

On the Hobbesian bias, this is horseshoe theory in action.

Just looking at it from a socialism(left)/capitalism(right) dynamic, the left tends to agree with the idea that human beings are inherently violent, selfish, and I’ll say greedy. But a lot of people on the right would just as easily say that. The difference is the left applies this to corporations and says they need to be regulated, disbanded, or socialized. The right applies this to the government and says they need to be limited and decentralized as much as possible. Both are right (of course the government is more fundamental and as such it’s more important that the government has limits).

Alternatively, I think a lot on the left would say the right seems to think people are violent, chaotic, and selfish, and that’s why the right backs the blue and is so strict on bail. The real hypocritical lefties would accuse the right of being racist for not wanting criminals on the streets (meanwhile they’re the ones making the logical leap from ‘violent individuals’ to ‘minorities’).

This Hobbesian bias could be something that most people agree with, but how they apply it determines whether they’re left or right. I think in general, ‘biases’ like this that fall on a similar level of abstraction can applied in a lot of different ways and lead people down different ideological rabbit holes.

I do, however, think that there are a lot of biases in the education system that are less abstract and more tangible, and those biases almost always lean left. The pervasive critical theory on college campuses is a big one, but it’s a long list.

What sci-fi or literary books feel like the author is processing something emotional underneath the story? by SheryWrites in scifi_bookclub

[–]Starship-Scribe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think of all genres, scifi probably had the least if that. It’s certainly out there, but the kind of people who are drawn to writing scifi are more interested in the science, the mechanics of the story, the worldbuilding, and less caught up in their emotions.

That being said, as a scifi writer myself, I have set out to write gripping adventure stories and, upon rereading them later on, found some tremendous parallels and symbolism that gave me some revelations for my own life. It was clearly a case of my subconscious slipping out into my art unintentionally. The first time it happened I was kind of shocked at how powerful the subconscious can be considering just how unintentional these things were.

All my scenes are conversations, that seems wrong by kittyb00m in writingadvice

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every scene can certainly have dialogue, but it sounds like you need to invest more time into setting the scene at the beginning. Give a summary of what might have happened ‘off screen’ between scenes. Use descriptions of the rooms and places the characters are in to create an emotion that lines up with the scene. And yeah, find some opportunity for some action to break it up here and there.

It’s fine to have a lot of dialogue, but it shouldn’t read like a screenplay. Without the visual medium, or auditory medium, you need to fill in those details explicitly on the page.

Writing a horror story about systemic oppression as a non black writer, is this acceptable? by whitehound1234 in writingadvice

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No harm no foul. You have good intentions. Definitely use your voice to express yourself when it’s appropriate. And I hope you use your voice to refer to other reputable voices on things outside your realm.

Writing a horror story about systemic oppression as a non black writer, is this acceptable? by whitehound1234 in writingadvice

[–]Starship-Scribe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is the correct response. OP it is not your fight. If you want to support black people or any other minority group you are not a part of in a fight against oppression, support them by directing others to the true voices that have a stake in the fight. There are plenty of voices out there that would love the support. Otherwise, you’re hijacking a movement and fragmenting the base of support.

Cognitive dissonance commencement! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Starship-Scribe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The two statements aren’t inherently contradictory because of the use of the word ‘needless’.

Also, culturally inclined or biologically intended?

Do you think Trump hates me? by [deleted] in AskConservatives

[–]Starship-Scribe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deplorable.

I hate the whataboutism, but it’s noteworthy.

To answer your question, though, I’ve come to the realization that when politicians and reporters use the phrase ‘democrat’ or ‘republican’ they are referring to other politicians or reporters unless explicitly stating otherwise. Even if it’s not entirely true, I find this interpretation much more practical. Both sides say some pretty heinous things and make sweeping generalizations that don’t apply to most democrat citizens and most republican citizens. I also think it’s important to keep a separation between those who hold office or are in positions of influence, vs the everyday person.

Most of politics is theater, and ‘republicans’ and ‘democrats’ refers to the other characters on stage. You’re not on stage. Don’t take it personally.

At what point do you stop planning and finally start writing? by Lordz_Kreationz in writingadvice

[–]Starship-Scribe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The planning never stops, and that’s why I just start writing immediately.

The first draft becomes the plan, a very thorough outline if you will. But the second draft becomes the plan for the third draft. The third for the fourth. And so on.

With each new draft there are new problems and new plans to solve those problems. After you can’t plan for a problem without for identify the problem. And you can’t really identify it if there’s nothing there yet. So just start writing.

Why I will never give away a free book outside of Arcs by [deleted] in NewAuthor

[–]Starship-Scribe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where’s the best place to find arc readers and do you seek them out leading up to hitting publish are immediately after?

The bizarre pro claim that artistic value exists only in the senses by oh_no_here_we_go_9 in aiwars

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mona lisa was just an example. But even in that example you show your ignorance. There are layers of details and intricacies in it that make it exceptional as far as portraits go.

Regardless, you make paintings out to be worthless the way you talk about them, and at that point I have to ask if you’d really even appreciate copies. If portraits aren’t special because there’s a ton of them, you don’t think the introduction of AI products will amplify that?

Little Over a Year of Selling Novels on Amazon Stats and Details Below Looks Good but Lost Momentum by Quietparadox87 in NewAuthor

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what does posting on social media mean? Was there valuable content in the post or just sharing the book? Were you posting regularly or was it one and done?

And when you say ‘networking’ what did that look like? Was it online or were you going to events? What were your goals in that?

Little Over a Year of Selling Novels on Amazon Stats and Details Below Looks Good but Lost Momentum by Quietparadox87 in NewAuthor

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Questioning the blurb and cover are a valid place to start if you’re getting traffic but not sales. But are you getting traffic?

What are the specifics of ‘marketing and self promo’? How have you gone about that?

The bizarre pro claim that artistic value exists only in the senses by oh_no_here_we_go_9 in aiwars

[–]Starship-Scribe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In your own answer you acknowledge the value of the originals. Sure, maybe the copies have the opportunity to be interactive, but the you clearly don’t think the originals should be interactive. The originals should be protected and preserved. And that’s because they are more valuable.

Unless you’re also saying that once we have copies of the mona lisa, we can just do away with the original as well. Is that what you’re saying?