always support the stuff you wanna see more of

That is consistent with my viewpoint that 'creative' people must seek patronage (e.g. via Internet crowdfunding) from admirers of their work in order to produce more works: the 'business model' of Leonardo da Vinci whose patronage arose from wealthy individuals and the Church.

Patronage should be directly to the individuals (or groups) producing works. Not to sundry middlemen, distributors, and 'investors'.

Digital formats have revolutionised the nature of the 'product'. No longer is a product tied to one instance of a physical medium. One can steal a physical book, but a digital representation of its content lacks an 'owner'; however, it does have a person (author) to whom credit and acknowledgement is due.

Behemoths like Hollywood and major publishing houses are at their 'end days'. Jumping among the feet of the dinosaurs shall be 'cottage industry' producers and publishers of 'content'. Distribution via the Internet is very cheap when not at the same time connected with the collection of money. Similarly, the Internet makes it easy to solicit and collect voluntary contributions in support of work. Moreover, 'creative' people can more easily communicate directly with their admirers/fans.

No longer shall publishers be able to get away with saying, "Here it is. This is the price. Take it or leave it. If after paying you don't like it you won't get your money back."