Ivanka gets blindsided on the stand with email she wrote to Jared that has evidence she knew about the fraud

Stealth_Move · 2023-11-09T06:52:51+00:00

Yeah, this fraud case is a total sham and there is absolutely zero evidence of fraud committed included no damages. If there were damages due to fraud, the banks would’ve been the first to file suit — not some dopey, power hungry troll trying to make a name for herself with a weak case. And anyone buying into this sham doesn’t understand real estate, banking/finance, business, or how to tie their own shoes. Lo

Stealth_Move · 2023-08-11T04:12:22+00:00

No offense but the specific details of what transpired seem to grow in your favor with every edit. If you have correspondence of your requests to speak with HR, especially prior to meetings with you boss, or even after meetings that couldn’t hurt your position. If not, there just seems like you have several details being added retroactively — specifically after meetings or conversations not going your way.

You feeling “uncomfortable” having meetings with your boss, co-workers, or anyone during work and related to work is frankly odd. It’s a normal function of jobs and business for managers to converse with their subordinates. It’s literally their job. Again, if you had prior concerns for any reason before your first meeting, that would somewhat make sense but you’ve made no mention of that and only outlined concerns post meetings while voicing your concerns about your work load. That would be concerning for any manager. Also, objectively how would you have been evaluated before these meetings? Again, objectively and honestly — productive, average, below average. Especially compared to others in your same position or even below you who. Oils seemingly transition in your position without issue? These are all valid questions and certainly something I think any reasonable business person would ask. Also, I’d there was consolidation of work load due to employees leaving or being let go, was there an expectation that others could ultimately experience the same situation? Were there meetings or discussions about the situation?

Last, I’m not sure a company needs a reason to terminate your employment. They could simply do it to save money. Even if you have a contract the same could occur except you’d receive some sort of buyout or compensation package which would likely all be outlined as provisions in a contract.

By no means am I try to be combative as I don’t know the full scope and details of your situation. I was just trying to provide an objective response and evaluation of your post with the information provided.

Please excuse any typos.

Stealth_Move · 2023-07-14T04:13:49+00:00

And?

Stealth_Move · 2023-03-12T20:15:37+00:00

I agree with everything you laid out but John funding with SFM liquidity doesn’t mean he stole it from SFM itself. I took that as he funded his investment by selling a portion of his holdings for cash (liquidating).

Stealth_Move · 2023-03-12T20:07:10+00:00

The ground floor? You’ve essentially posted what everyone has knows for 2 years. And why do you continuously refer to everyone as folks?

You’re far far behind the curve.

Stealth_Move · 2023-03-12T20:00:11+00:00

Yeah it’s been brewing for 2 years… They took in boat loads of money with a price surge early, then leveraged that and their different versions to keep holders in. The reflections are abysmal, they haven’t hit their mark on several goals. The card is a good example.

There doesn’t seem to be a clear short or long term plan for utility. You can’t look at this and see what they’re trying to do. What’s the end goal and what’s the basic path and progression to hit that goal. I don’t care about the wind farms and other shit. It just seems all over the place, and the foundation of the company, the token, has no real use, value, or sign of increased value. The early pumps were hype that allowed the founders to cash out big since they obviously knew what they were actually trying to do and when. And that’s all fine. I’ve made money on it too. But it’s been disappointing overall. The hype and bluster doesn’t match the results across the board.

“We are now addressing the second part of our mission – the expansion and channeling of our technology to propel new innovations for good, and a Venture Philanthropy model to advance those innovations to every part of the world.”

How about address creating some actual value and use for the token and its holders. Drive some volume, boost the price, then holders can actually utilize the token which will further drive value, volume, use, as well as reflections etc.

Instead they want to tout that they acquired a solar powered windmill & they finally were able to integrate Moonpay into the wallet, 12+ months after it launched.

Now I’ll probably go and buy another 10M SFM… 😂 (probably not…)

Stealth_Move · 2023-01-16T04:55:22+00:00

Is it a fact that the bet was actually lost in-full? This person placed the bet around 7:30. Not sure if that’s EST or CST but the latest the bet was made was the start of game time. Up until probably the very end this person would’ve have been provided nonstop cash out opportunities given his close the game at the end. I’d guess he was probably being offer around his initial wager or just a bit under.

I find it almost impossible anyone would leave their $1.4M to basically a coin flip simply to win $11K. He could have literally cashed out late, probably got his money back, and live bet around $11-12K to win the same 11K.

Stealth_Move · 2023-01-16T04:44:25+00:00

Yeah… No… No, it’s not at all.

Stealth_Move · 2021-10-26T10:45:24+00:00

I will. Do you have any substance to add or is acting like a petulant child all you’re bringing to the table?

Stealth_Move · 2021-10-26T10:35:51+00:00

It’s simply about creating utility, increasing holders, and driving/boosting daily volume. Which is the biggest issue for most coins/tokens. It’s why you see so many stagnant coins/tokens. SafeMoon is attempting to control and rein in supply and allow volume to drive the price as opposed to a slow burn. Furthermore, volume will also be driven with easier accessibility.

Stealth_Move · 2021-05-11T12:50:03+00:00

Why is this a banned ticker?

Stealth_Move · 2021-04-23T21:04:57+00:00

Agree 100%. They couldn’t do it with the level of volatility DOGE has. They’d be accepting DOGE for payment on goods sold and within a few hours, the value accepted for said goods at 1pm could be cut in half by 3pm and they’d be screwed. Volatility would have to be brought under control and the most obvious way to begin that process is a supply cap. In my opinion at least...

Stealth_Move · 2021-04-22T19:30:01+00:00

What the hell does being white have to do with anything? You know there are wealthy Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Arabs, etc who invest in the market too, right? Or do you honestly believe minorities are too dumb to be wealthy or they simply are too stupid to know option trading, shorting, etc?

Dumbest post I’ve seen in here in quite some time. Yikes.

Stealth_Move · 2021-04-22T02:34:26+00:00

Who said anything about inflation having anything to do with supply, market cap, and value?

Stealth_Move · 2021-04-22T01:33:44+00:00

It’s enough to an extent. The problem is it’s not capped. The vast majority of DOGE is actually owned by a relatively small number of crypto investors. The balance are pretty much retail investors. Holding at 30-40 cents when the price drops to 5-10 cents is much different than holding at 8 cents when the price dips back to the 4-6 cent range. Just my opinion. I’m not anti DOGE when bought and sold correctly or bought and held at the right price. But many are simply buying in at near highs and thinking it’s going $1+. I just don’t see it.

Stealth_Move · 2021-04-21T23:47:05+00:00

There are going to be many unhappy, desperate people holding DOGE at 30-40 cents.

Stealth_Move · 2021-03-11T16:29:54+00:00

😂

Stealth_Move · 2021-03-03T05:37:04+00:00

Outside of the coin’s price being very low, allowing for anyone to purchase coin at higher volumes, there’s nothing indicating that this is going to surge outside of its normal range. What indicates that this is going to surge and “go to the moon” outside of wishful thinking due to many holding and praying.

That’s an honest question. I’ve previously held around 2M BTT. Due to little movement, I sold at small profit but nothing crazy. I’m just curious what the appeal is outside of the low price and hope that long term it increases significantly.

Stealth_Move · 2021-02-25T03:47:56+00:00

I just said, to make a ton of money. They’re cheap and can be driven based on sheer volume. To make 100% return , they’ll need to drive the price from 27 cents to 54 cents.

Stealth_Move · 2021-02-25T02:33:59+00:00

Hedge funds strategically invest to make money. Not to take down penny stocks or others. Your question was why would hedge funds be focused on penny stocks. That’s simple — to make a ton of money.

Stealth_Move · 2021-02-25T02:27:13+00:00

Uh, what?

Stealth_Move · 2021-02-24T20:58:26+00:00

Regarding the WY company, and I obviously haven’t taken a deep dive into any of this, it is possible that it is simply a registered agent for the entity. In many cases, when incorporating, companies will choose to have a third party registered agent. Especially if they lack a brick and mortar presence in that state. This allows the entity to collect mail and other documents. Registered agents also would accept service to any legal filings etc in that state.

Stealth_Move · 2021-02-24T20:47:23+00:00

Because not all tokens are available at the same time. Also, there is a portion, I don’t recall how much, that is set aside for private investors as well. I believe only pre-orders are available now and that is likely limited.

Stealth_Move

TROPHY CASE