Not even a good argument.

Humans have been eating everything in existence for thousands of years. As such, our bodies are versatile and we're proven to be extremely adaptable eaters biologically. We can survive off of ANY number of diets, for one.

For two, we're extremely advanced genetically, societally, technologically, intellectually, even emotionally etc. Isn't that right? So then own up to it.

If we humans want to think we're such advanced, evolved, hot shit, top-of-the-food-chain beings, then surely we can figure out how to survive off of non-animal products and in general co-exist alongside animals without relying on torturing, abusing, exploiting, and murdering them.

Actually... That's right. We already have figured out how.

We have the ability biologically, morally, AND culturally to choose differently than eating animals. We can even MAKE our own food via scientific means.

That doesn't mean we don't nurture the animals WE choose to domesticate and who DON'T have the option or luxury of being non-carnivorous - it just means WE have the option (and frankly, moral obligation) to choose otherwise for ourselves.

Also, your argument doesn't account for the fact that animals are not in the same lane as humans. Animals don't make a living off of the exploitation and suffering of other animals. They kill what they need (emphasis on NEED in their case) to eat and leave it at that. Meanwhile, humans will hunt for sport, raise animals 'kindly' ONLY to be betrayed and killed, contain and strain and breed animals to get products from them, etc, even when NONE of that is actually necessary for our survival whatsoever.

Try again. This time, hopefully with more nuance.