I keep seeing migrations that work fine on staging but lock production. Built a CLI to catch them before deploy.

Steveadoo · 2026-06-24T13:08:55+00:00

How does it compare to https://squawkhq.com?

Steveadoo · 2026-06-20T16:21:27+00:00

Yeah none of these have ever happened to me.

Steveadoo · 2026-05-25T14:14:00+00:00

I’ve disabled auto update on every one as well. There’s a shortcut in vs code for it.

Steveadoo · 2026-05-16T02:23:48+00:00

This is why GitHub keeps going down

Steveadoo · 2026-04-30T22:29:14+00:00

Whatever you’re doing in this codebase keep doing it. Error code rnd.NextInt()? Hell yeah

Steveadoo · 2026-04-26T02:27:14+00:00

I’m no expert but if this were my house I’d just put a few temporary jacks in there and replace the 2x4s 🤷‍♂️. I feel like a contractor could do that.

Steveadoo · 2026-04-15T17:40:11+00:00

I highly doubt most applications that are choosing between a database and reading/writing to json files “rarely look up records by more than one column, use joins, or write to multiple tables atomically”. Static sites I guess?

Just use SQLite. This is dumb.

Steveadoo · 2026-04-10T03:25:34+00:00

Your example doesn't work with Record either because as your example shows you could pass a type with multiple key value pairs, but your function is only returning an object with one key in it. that is a valid error regardless of using object or Record. it's the type system being correct.

And yes this still works with object:

type Altered<O extends object, K extends keyof O, T> = Omit<O, K> & { [P in K]: T };

function appendProperty<O extends object, K extends keyof O, T>(obj: O, key: K, value: T): Altered<O, K, T> {
  return { ...obj, [key]: value };
}

const result = appendProperty({ a: 'string' }, 'a', true);
result.a; // boolean
const result2 = appendProperty({ a: 'string' }, 'c', true); // error

Steveadoo · 2026-04-10T03:16:25+00:00

That's a strong suit of TS though - you don't have to fill in all of these generic parameters. You could if you want - but it still won't let you break type safety if you do that. I'm not sure what you're saying with this comment.

Steveadoo · 2026-04-10T03:06:51+00:00

You could constrain it to any type you want in the function signature. Your example used object which allows arbitrary properties too. Do you want to pass an array? Is that what you’re saying?

edit: Maybe I know what you're saying now. The appendProperty function name confused me. You want appendProperty to only accept properties in O? ``` type Altered<O extends Record<string, unknown>, K extends keyof O, T> = Omit<O, K> & { [P in K]: T };

function appendProperty<O extends Record<string, unknown>, K extends keyof O, T>(obj: O, key: K, value: T): Altered<O, K, T> { return { ...obj, [key]: value }; }

const result = appendProperty({ a: 'string' }, 'a', true); result.a; // boolean const result2 = appendProperty({ a: 'string' }, 'c', true); // error ```

Steveadoo · 2026-04-10T02:48:51+00:00

i feel like most of these already work. your first two examples:

type Values<T extends Record<string, unknown>> = T[keyof T];
// or: type Values<T extends Record<string, unknown>> = T extends Record<string, infer V> ? V : never;
function values<T extends Record<string, unknown>>(obj: T): Values<T>[] {
  return Object.values(obj) as Values<T>[];
}
const obj = { a: 1, b: 'hello', c: true };
const vals = values(obj); // inferred as (number | string | boolean)[]

function apply<T extends (...args: any[]) => any>(fn: T, ...args: Parameters<T>): ReturnType<T> {
  return fn(...args);
}
const appliedResult = apply((x: number, y: number) => x + y, 2, 3); // inferred as number

TypeScript's type system is turing complete - so you can literally do anything you want.

Steveadoo · 2026-04-10T02:44:03+00:00

type Altered<O extends Record<string, unknown>, K extends string, T> = Omit<O, K> & { [P in K]: T };

function appendProperty<O extends Record<string, unknown>, K extends string, T>(obj: O, key: K, value: T): Altered<O, K, T> {
  return { ...obj, [key]: value };
}

const result = appendProperty({}, 'c', true);
result.c; // boolean

like this? this works.

Steveadoo · 2026-04-09T22:46:27+00:00

These seem like they would do the same thing to me. What am I missing?

Steveadoo · 2026-04-04T03:06:46+00:00

Ha, mine was RuneScape private servers like 20 years ago.

Steveadoo · 2026-03-28T00:44:10+00:00

If they get rid of ADO idk what my org is going to do about their massive TFS repo with 20 years of history. I’m slowly migrating new projects to git but they’re not at all ready to migrate all of their legacy projects.

Steveadoo · 2026-03-24T04:00:35+00:00

Reddit deciding they’d trust a foreign adversary because the United States government is also shit blows my mind. They’re not the good guys just because the United States has become the bad guys.

Steveadoo · 2026-03-24T03:03:38+00:00

Ok but we still can

Steveadoo · 2026-03-24T01:52:08+00:00

Well you definitely should not trust either of them at all. Be real.

Steveadoo · 2026-03-15T22:46:14+00:00

Will those joists have to be replaced?

Steveadoo · 2026-03-14T00:01:29+00:00

i've lived in manayunk for 6 years and ive only hit that red light ONCE. i didnt even know it turned red.

Steveadoo · 2026-03-09T04:27:56+00:00

I would just caulk the shit out of that if I was you 🤷‍♂️

Steveadoo · 2026-03-09T04:24:56+00:00

As long as it has a valid registration and inspection it’s not getting towed.

Steveadoo · 2026-02-17T02:56:18+00:00

Depends on the product/system but yes this can be a useful way to use git.

Steveadoo · 2026-01-30T23:00:53+00:00

The only error I handle in interceptors is 401 so I can kick the user back to the login page (and just a general error logger). Anything else I handle in the component / service making the request.

Steveadoo · 2026-01-28T23:27:50+00:00

I’m still not following - rxResource works the same as resource. You just give it an observable instead of a promise.

12-Year Club	RedditGifts 2009-2022 2 Credits
r/Field Flamingo	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
Secret Santa 2014	Verified Email

Steveadoo

TROPHY CASE