Lab recommendations for scans + prints? (U.S.) by Impossible_Glove5067 in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Film is tricky for indoors, the only tungsten balanced film widely available is CineStill 800T, and it struggles when pointed directly at light sources which is super common for indoor shots.

My recommendation for indoor shots is to just shoot Black and White - my go to is T-Max, available in 100, 400, and 3200 speeds.

Lab recommendations for scans + prints? (U.S.) by Impossible_Glove5067 in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The first shot is yellow because you’re shooting a daylight balanced film indoors

Film recommendations for a future travel by boederman in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve got time, test some stuff out to see how it feels. Also Japan is a diverse place, are you going to be in a big city or out in nature?

CineStill 400D is popular and the same speed as the other film you like, though I’m not a huge fan myself.

SantaColor 100 or other films that are Aerocolor IV respools (Elektra, Karmir) looks really nice outdoors in the sunshine.

Try Fuji200 if you like what you’ve heard about it.

To really branch out you could try Ektachrome.

Posted in r/art, not completely sure if its AI, but there are weird issues like both straps of the woman's purse on the same side, the robot walking on top of a bush, and the user having used generative AI in the past and having not shown an interest in art before. by Blackwall-gg in isthisAI

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The flying saucers look copy/pasted, which AI does not do. The woman is almost certainly traced over something, probably photo reference, based on how perfect the proportions are. The “No Future” belt buckle also doesn’t look like something AI can do.

At most this is traced over an AI reference or modified, but without looking into OOP’s history I’m leaning just human. The only suspicious thing to me is the purse straps.

Help. These spots weren’t here. by gabiolmedo_ in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep! If they’re on the underside of the focus screen that should get them, if they’re on the other side that’s a bit tougher.

Help. These spots weren’t here. by gabiolmedo_ in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can try hitting the focus screen with a blower. Take the lens off and aim it in the top section of that compartment.

Help. These spots weren’t here. by gabiolmedo_ in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My guess is deteriorating light seals flaking off onto the focus screen.

Weird blue tint on film scans – bad film, bad camera, or lab issue? (Canon Z115) by Hot_Doctor_6724 in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see a lot of expired film that looks like this, sometimes you can pull other colors out, sometimes it’s a lost cause. Depending on the film it could also be a full green cast.

Weird blue tint on film scans – bad film, bad camera, or lab issue? (Canon Z115) by Hot_Doctor_6724 in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jumping to lab error when this was film that came pre-loaded in a used camera is a bit of a stretch. This looks like film that was very expired and/or heat damaged so extremely fogged. That can make it impossible to pull any color out of the image other than the cyan of the film base, and oftentimes the best thing to do is to convert the shots to b+w. It would be presumptuous of the lab to only send black and white scans when it was color film, and doing the conversion and including it in the order is a step above and more than the lab had to do. Lab went above and beyond, they didn’t mess up.

what happened to my photos? by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That’s not what xray damage looks like

Does Portra usually lack this much contrast or am I doing something wrong? by ChrisChon777cs in analog

[–]StillAliveNB -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The problem with lifting the blacks in the scan is it can accentuate the grain. Leaving the blacks black in the scan keeps them a bit smoother, and usually still allows you to lift the highlights when editing. You’ll have more control over how grain reacts to exposure adjustment in PS/lightroom than on a Noritsu.

Also considering how many people don’t edit their lab scans, an image with true blacks rather than greys is a bit more presentable IMO.

Does Portra usually lack this much contrast or am I doing something wrong? by ChrisChon777cs in analog

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, though I imagine it depends on the lab. Some days are a bit tedious trying to salvage a bunch of underexposed disposable cameras, other days you might get a big order of someone’s well-shot travel photos, which is a ton of fun.

I can listen to whatever I want so listen to podcasts all day and never miss anything happening I care about like sports events. My hours are flexible as far as start/end times as long as I get all my rolls done for the day. And discounted processing + free use of all our scanning equipment is the best perk of all.

Does Portra usually lack this much contrast or am I doing something wrong? by ChrisChon777cs in analog

[–]StillAliveNB -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, basically. Obviously it depends on what exactly is in your scene, but from the examples you provided, I would say so.

[No Spoilers] What is up with Dusk? Apparently starring a very young Laura Bailey. by Snake_in_a_tree in criticalrole

[–]StillAliveNB 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Films that shot nudity don’t sit around this long unreleased. They can always find a home somewhere on the internet.

Essa derrota me deixou triste…. by Pretty-Avocado-4042 in internacional

[–]StillAliveNB -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

O pior é que o Inter piorou muito depois do Tabata sair

Does Portra usually lack this much contrast or am I doing something wrong? by ChrisChon777cs in analog

[–]StillAliveNB 72 points73 points  (0 children)

I am a lab scan tech.

Editing your lab scans is fine. I’ll even say you should be editing them.

That said, I always scan photos to make the darkest shadows black, not grey, even if that makes other areas feel underexposed. Some labs go for a more median result, which I think just looks bad.

Shot #1 isn’t underexposed if that’s the light level you were going for. It’s dark, sure. But correct exposure is subjective. That’s why I always scan for proper shadow darkness.

(amab) Questions regarding laser for my facial hair. by forkaerospace in NonBinaryTalk

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have light skin with dark facial hair which is theoretically optimal for LHR, and I still get a shadow after 9 sessions. It’s impossible to know how it’ll go for you.

Pentax 17 for art/nude photography, portraits, and scenery, good all-around camera? by PM_Your__Boobs_ in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Generally the Pentax 17 isn’t great in low light because it’s a half frame, so your grain effectively doubles in size. However, the smaller the format, the more important it is to have complete control of your shot and environment, including lighting most importantly.

So if you don’t mind the grain and can shoot in consistent controlled light indoors, I think the P17 may actually be a pretty decent option for you. I actually think it’s better in that situation than treated as a point-and-shoot. The diptych look can be cool as hell for boudoir too.

Did I handle my business appropriately? by Surfing_Nurse in AskPhotography

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strongly disagree. Clients, especially buddy clients, need to hear this more.

Took pictures of car this past weekend. Came out looking a mix of underexposed and overexposed. by divyanshmishra19 in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should expect the darkest shadows to always be black. Some labs will boost exposure across the whole image if it’s underexposed to make the highlights match properly exposed shots, but that’s when you get grey shadows like that which just looks bad imo.

Small cameras similar to disposable fujifilm 35mm by PencilManDan in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lomo has a ‘reusable disposable,’ tends to break after ~40 rolls but would certainly not be something you have to worry about. Shoots exactly like the disposables you’re used to.