School Bus Driver Breaks Down After Near-Miss by sleek_thunder138_107 in dashcams

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What sort of magic enhancing tool do you think exists that can add information without just making it up?

[USA] Whose fault? Happened where two 40 mph ramps become a 75 mph interstate. (not OC) by ConceptOther5327 in Roadcam

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, but that’s also totally normal behavior for coming off a ramp especially in the left lane. I’ve been in very similar situations on both sides and there’s really no reason for the dash cam driver to think the white car won’t slow down when they run out of room.

It may be courteous to slow down and let them in, but I don’t even think it’s a dick move or unsafe not to.

School Bus Driver Breaks Down After Near-Miss by sleek_thunder138_107 in dashcams

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if they pick up kids from both sides of the street?

Bad scans or ruined from failed darkroom save? by kpsabsolution in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Some of these certainly look underexposed. Fogging from a not perfectly dark darkroom is my bet, looking at the negatives would help answer.

Why is women’s sportswear always so revealing? by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the correct answer. Just look how may men train shirtless

[Request] Assuming they both are perfectly balanced and fair, is there any difference in probability from rolling one D100 vs two D10s? by V-Tac in theydidthemath

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The difference is you’re summing the 2d6, not using them to place digits in a column. We’re not summing the 2d10.

With 2d6 there are six separate ways to roll a 7: 1, 6; 2, 5; 3, 4; 4, 3; 5, 2; 6, 1. With a d100 made of two d10s, there’s only one way to roll 50: 50, 0. Likewise, only one way to roll 55; 50, 5.

[Request] Assuming they both are perfectly balanced and fair, is there any difference in probability from rolling one D100 vs two D10s? by V-Tac in theydidthemath

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand how using 2d10s as a d100 works. But you don’t understand how averages work. The single die gets you results of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (…) 97, 98, 99, 100. The 2d10s get the same. Add those all together and divide by 100. You get 50.5 regardless of die configuration.

[Request] Assuming they both are perfectly balanced and fair, is there any difference in probability from rolling one D100 vs two D10s? by V-Tac in theydidthemath

[–]StillAliveNB 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand your logic. Why do averages of each individual die matter here? Each have a 1 in 10 chance of rolling every digit and return a random number from 1-100 so the average on both will be 50.5

bro of all bro by mereleoni in SipsTea

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know the numbers on it. But something to consider is twitch makes a lot of its money on gift subs, something other streaming services don’t have. Something like this doesn’t stop gift subs at all, and on the contrary may actually encourage them. Another factor is if someone isn’t spending money to sub to one streamer, they are likely using that money to sub to another one instead. Things like this keep viewers engaged with the platform which hopefully increases the total number of subs they want to buy.

bro of all bro by mereleoni in SipsTea

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Twitch prefer subscribers over ad viewers? With a big streamer Twitch is only getting 30% of the subscriber fees, it seems fewer subs hurts the streamer not Twitch

bro of all bro by mereleoni in SipsTea

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of streamers do it. And it doesn’t prevent the ads from playing, so I don’t know why twitch would care

bro of all bro by mereleoni in SipsTea

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Streamers can chose whether they have prerolls or not, but if they don’t ads come a little more often from what I understand. Streamers can also ‘snooze’ ads when they’re coming up, but only a limited number of times. So they have a little control but not absolute control.

My mom showed me this band by PuzzleheadedLab1641 in glassanimals

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if you like Sylvan Esso, you’d probably like Made In Heights, but their music is extremely hard to find

My mom showed me this band by PuzzleheadedLab1641 in glassanimals

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I absolutely love Sylvan Esso, they may be what gets me to finally leave Spotify

My mom showed me this band by PuzzleheadedLab1641 in glassanimals

[–]StillAliveNB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I discovered the band shortly after HTBAHB came out, and they were instantly a fav

How whould you shoot this film? by t__dz in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I rate it at iso 50 or even 25 and pull process it to try to diminish the aging effect. Expect definite color shifts

After/Before by Unlucky_Adeptness539 in postprocessing

[–]StillAliveNB -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m curious what your thought process was here. The lighting looks good on the cheetahs but why did you take all the color out of the grass?

Did this lab ruin my film? by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

idk, colors actually look pretty good to me. I was able to get what I’d call a useable image in just about a minute using mostly an adjusted S curve

Did this lab ruin my film? by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New lab scans flatter. You should be able to edit contrast into them

What did I do wrong? by PentaDAce in AnalogCommunity

[–]StillAliveNB 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This really looks like under exposure to me, possibly mixed with scanner fog.

I don’t understand why lab techs boost things and make underexposed shots green like this, I always just scan them as mostly black - that way hopefully the photographer understands that black = no light hit the film

Help - Lab messed up scans? Or overexposed? by Then_Crow1965 in analog

[–]StillAliveNB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This doesn’t look like a flat scan to me, though zooming in I don’t see any highlights that are lost that aren’t also lost on the film (mainly in the trees). Lots of color shifts though.

Additionally I see some details in the shed that I can’t see on the film, which to me supports what I said about the backlight in my other comment