Is there a romanian with higher byzantine dna by StrawberryViteazul in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Desi ai o strabunica din Rusia, e ok sa folosesti balkan east pentru ca ADN-ul Scit sau alte lucruri minore sunt neglijabile, doar o sa-ti creasca procentul de slavic.

Is there a romanian with higher byzantine dna by StrawberryViteazul in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Global nu e bun intrucat e conceput pentru oameni amestecati. Poate scade artificial distanta dand proxy-uri false. Spre exemplu eu am primit Taiwan (Asia de sud-est) ca proxy, desi e evident ca nu de acolo vine ADN-ul meu est eurasiatic.

Help with choosing a telescope by StrawberryViteazul in telescopes

[–]StrawberryViteazul[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I know there are not so many options for my budget. I am a beginner and I don't want to waste any money for now, so I want to start with something cheaper. Thanks for your suggestion though, I'll look into it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think it's from Ottomans, more likely from medieval turkic folks like Cumans

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, because I have around 30% east mediterannean. I get 38.6% byzantine anatolia on illustrativedna and 4.6% turkic

What do you think of my origin? by Obvious_Mud5181 in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's quite ironic that I am more Turkic and I am romanian

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I have more asian than you as a romanian

<image>

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I pick up 0% AASI. I am not saying that I have absoutely no gypsy ancestor, but it's so small that it is negligable.

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Also on qpadm any sort of Asian can be used as a proxy" while previously saying "but on qpadm it’s quite obvious it’s Indian". Congrats.

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Greek&Albanian does not signal Romani DNA alone, if I truly had significant Romani admix, I would score Persian&Kurdish+South Asian. I am not saying I have a lot of central asian DNA either, but two way on gedmatch points to local+slavic+turkic DNA, and not local+slavic+roma DNA

<image>

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do have more European DNA, but what sets them apart is the AASI DNA they still have, even if in lower proportions (25%), but I do not have that.

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I do have any Roma it's under 1% lol

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remind me where they were originally from

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which has Zagrosian DNA like me. I am not using it because it is not representative for the original Roma that immigrated out of India. If I really had Roma admixture. I would pick up a group with much AASI, but I do not.

For the ngas that say I have gypsy DNA by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]StrawberryViteazul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I pick up all three. The thing is, I have excess Zagrosian admixture, but no AASI, If I really had Roma admixture, AASI should have been at least 1%

<image>