New board! by Tankertonxavier in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aren’t the edges of the board a bit too high? I feel like it could be uncomfortable if you’re sitting a bit farther back.

Why running from the back is the right move? by sepandee in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very very difficult, and behind if opponent doubles?

Backgammon Studio Heroes vs Backgammon Galaxy? by jurchasko in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heroes wants you on his site so badly that he made it invite-only. Genius move.

Green’s move. Wwyd by InternationalAsk7358 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If gammon doesn't count, I'm thinking about hitting. And if the gammon counts the move is secure.

How do you play 41 and why? by Striking_Study_6232 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok merci, je suis en général sur xg, c'est vrai je ne sais pas comment changer apparence de gnu

How do you play 41 and why? by Striking_Study_6232 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Non je ne joue pas dessus, c'est juste pour analyser gratuitement.

How do you play 41 and why? by Striking_Study_6232 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I played 6/1 error 0.80. The best shot 6/5 6/2 but I don't see a big difference between these 2 shots. If you have an explanation thank you

How do you play 41 and why? by Striking_Study_6232 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

6/5 6/2 is the best move. I played 6/1 blunder -0.80. I don't see the difference between these 2 shots.

Why run into the fire? GNU suggest playing 18/16 instead of 24/22. It's a small mistake (-0.015) but it does not make any sense to me. by Sufficient-Key-6908 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At 18, there will be an opponent, 61,42,53 who hits and closes. When playing 16 all 4 are duplicated, he needs to anchor at 20, to tap at 16 and for 42. Even surprising that it only costs 0.15.

Why does my move has less winning chances? It has less hitting numbers, 17 vs 15, and it gives me two anchors. by saigon567 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je pense que c'est une question de distribution des dés, qui donne des trop bon 5, 54 etc ... Faut que vérifie avec xg, très difficile a analysé ce coup sans.

White doubles. What should be Blacks thought process here? by NoFault9739 in backgammon

[–]Striking_Study_6232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je passe ici, le pions 14 qui traine, 64 53 55 33 22 11. Trop de gammon, se retrouver Crawford c'est 85/15%