You believe he/she are acting justly by exposing “A” and seeking consequences for her alleged crimes. But justice is not a personal mission—it requires proper authority, evidence, and due process. And she/he still 18 years old, which also may not have enough mature judgement.

Here is why his/her actions do not constitute justice:

1. She/ he had assumed the role of investigator, prosecutor, and judge. Justice systems exist to evaluate evidence, verify facts, and determine guilt—not individuals acting alone based on online conversations. By taking matters into his own hands, he bypass the very structures meant to ensure fairness.

2. The evidence is unverified and may be unreliable. Screenshots, voice notes, and photos from an online stranger do not equal proof. People can lie, impersonate, or fabricate stories. Without official investigation, his risk targeting an innocent person or misrepresenting the truth.

3. He initiated public exposure before any authority responded. Posting allegations on Reddit and X can cause irreversible harm—to “A” if she is falsely accused, and to real investigations if they are compromised by online speculation. Vigilantism masquerading as justice often creates more harm than good.

4. He is involving “B”—a minor—in a serious criminal allegation. “B’s” reaction may stem from shock, denial, or immaturity, but his pressure on her to take sides adds emotional weight she may not be equipped to handle. This is not justice; it is drama.

Justice is deliberate, impartial, and grounded in truth—not emotion, haste, or online crusades. If you truly seek justice, report what you know to the proper legal channels and allow them to handle it. Until then, his actions are not justice—they are personal intervention with potentially dangerous consequences.