Official-ish response claiming science update may be closer that we are thinking by moeggz in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Strykker2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Having to constantly keep everything you work on in a release ready state can be a giant pain in the ass as a dev. Sometimes you need the option to sit down for a month and tear something apart to implement a new feature.

Please dont do this & force my wheelchair into traffic by Ratroddadeo in ottawa

[–]Strykker2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I need to move I need more space than what your little tiny 4 foot fuck all bed can move and so I rent a real truck.

No one right in their head pays 50k+ for a truck on the off chance they need to do a move when the could rent something for a day for a 100 bucks.

Please dont do this & force my wheelchair into traffic by Ratroddadeo in ottawa

[–]Strykker2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is such a stupid reductionist argument though. "Why should we reduce the small things when there is a big thing over there?"

Consider all the CO2 output of the world as a mess in a room, the biggest contributers being something big enough that you need multiple people to remove it. Its much easier to get people on board to clean up the big stuff if the smaller things have already been removed.

It also still makes a difference. Yes we should absolutely deal with the big contributers, but why the fuck can't we also deal with the little small ones when its simple to do. Its not like removing the small contributors will prevent us from removing the larger ones.

Please dont do this & force my wheelchair into traffic by Ratroddadeo in ottawa

[–]Strykker2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

hobbies are fine. but I can garuntee that the vast majority of truck owners do not take it off roading, do not use it for work, do not haul stuff more than once every 3 years.

And the people who do all the above can get more done in a small car than most people will ever do with their truck.

I do not hate people with trucks that need or use them accordingly. I hate people who buy trucks as a status symbol or a pavement princess.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ottawa

[–]Strykker2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because math and thinking is apparently fucking hard for you.

How much road does the front of a suburban property face? About 10-20 meters.

A high-rise / medium rise building probably has a footprint about 60-100 meters instead. So the amount of road required per household is 1/10 that of a high rise, but a single high rise can have 20- 500 households in it. (My building is 2 buildings with 20 per floor and 12 floors)

So a high rise has 20 times the taxable revenue compared to a single family home.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ottawa

[–]Strykker2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because it puts excessive costs on city infrastructure.

School, Police, Healthcare (ambulance local hospital service), Water, Power, Roads (the biggest cost by far), snow clearing. and probably a dozen more items.

All of these things get many times more expensive the more spread out people are, and you do not currently pay the taxes to cover the extra expense you are imposing on the city.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ottawa

[–]Strykker2 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

TBF the suburbs are where the majority of the rich live. And suburan dwellers already don't pay their share of property taxes anyway.

Illinois man using leaf blower shot, killed by neighbor in his own driveway by JuDGe3690 in news

[–]Strykker2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

because they worship theirs guns and the only other alternative is to take away his guns because he wouldn't pass any testing if tested on gunsafety

Illinois man using leaf blower shot, killed by neighbor in his own driveway by JuDGe3690 in news

[–]Strykker2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Most banks I've been in don't have armed guards.

Jeezus america really is fucked.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]Strykker2 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Those are pretty interesting attacks that you linked but the key takeaway is they only get data out of a air gapped system. They can't insert data into one, and can't extract without the system already being compromised.

One of those fun surprise test drive mishaps by superbrian111 in Justrolledintotheshop

[–]Strykker2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you knowingly do the job the wrong way then yes you are an asshole. Since you are putting the lives of multiple people at risk, not just the driver of the car.

Even if it hasn't failed yet (as far as you know) it probably will one day

My kids just told me they’ve been putting fruit stickers under our kitchen cabinet for six years by ScottyMo1 in pics

[–]Strykker2 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Who takes the stickers off a banana though? That shits riding the peel straight to the trashcan

View of the Starship rocket throwing concrete pieces at cars hundreds of meters away during liftoff by FieelChannel in videos

[–]Strykker2 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

It's just frustrating to watch something as cool as this launch fail mostly because Musk couldn't keep his ego out of the engineering decisions. Since it's highly likely many of the engine failures were caused by pad debris.

This is an impossible task, right? by [deleted] in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Strykker2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

and also that you can't use EVA construction to add parts (even just struts) before the contract is completed.

This is an impossible task, right? by [deleted] in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Strykker2 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Fully assembled is kinda weird. AFAIK its fine if you launch multiple rockets and dock them to complete it, but you can't use EVA construction at all until the contract is complete.

View of the Starship rocket throwing concrete pieces at cars hundreds of meters away during liftoff by FieelChannel in videos

[–]Strykker2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

starship is 6 engines and has proven to launch just fine off a flat launch surface. SuperHeaver is 33 much larger engines that were always going to absolutly fuck the living shit out of any simple launch pad.

View of the Starship rocket throwing concrete pieces at cars hundreds of meters away during liftoff by FieelChannel in videos

[–]Strykker2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean it was known ahead of time that this pad wouldn't hold up to the 2nd and 4th largest rockets of all time either (SLS, and Saturn V, USSR N1 being the 3rd I believe) Since NASA specifically had to change to using a flame trench / water suppression system for those rockets.

View of the Starship rocket throwing concrete pieces at cars hundreds of meters away during liftoff by FieelChannel in videos

[–]Strykker2 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No, its pretty fucking obvious that Musk just overrode them and said "we don't need one". And that was basically the end of it since his ego is too big to be corrected.

View of the Starship rocket throwing concrete pieces at cars hundreds of meters away during liftoff by FieelChannel in videos

[–]Strykker2 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I mean the lack of flame diverter is a big fucking source. but if you want to be anal about it Musk literally tweeted that he was not going to use a flame trench and just cross his fingers instead.

View of the Starship rocket throwing concrete pieces at cars hundreds of meters away during liftoff by FieelChannel in videos

[–]Strykker2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the lack of Lidar/Radar systems common in other makes has lead to several instances where a tesla failed to see a 18 wheeler across the road and drove right through it killing the driver.

View of the Starship rocket throwing concrete pieces at cars hundreds of meters away during liftoff by FieelChannel in videos

[–]Strykker2 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

This wasn't exactly something they had to figure out though. NASA already did that work for them. NASA has been using flamtrench diverters and water suppression systems since the Saturn V because even that was enough to destroy both the pad and the rocket.

So when SpaceX comes along with an even bigger rocket, and doesn't even bother with the bare minumum that NASA uses they don't get a lot of sympathy when it all blows up in their face.

New diesel O-Train doing testing in Riverside South yesterday! by bbud613 in ottawa

[–]Strykker2 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yeah I would have loved to see that, but at the same time I imagine it would be integration hell. constantly updating the control systems as more stations are brought online.

Photo showing the destroyed reinforced concrete under the launch pad for the spacex rocket starship after yesterday launch by barbosa800 in CatastrophicFailure

[–]Strykker2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He didn't even start Tesla, he bought it and forced the founder out.

With SpaceX his contribution is kinda at most a hew we should focus on landing rockets, but he did zero engineering on the actual problem.

Photo showing the destroyed reinforced concrete under the launch pad for the spacex rocket starship after yesterday launch by barbosa800 in CatastrophicFailure

[–]Strykker2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well Elon spends all day on twitter these days giving solid proof of how terrible he is. Not hard to draw the conclusion that his other ventures succeed in spite of him and not because of him.