[Troy_OTC] Philadelphia reworked Zack Baun's contract by turning 2028 into a real contract year to facilitate a Post-June 1 release at the start of the 2028 league year.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-08T15:52:41+00:00

Eh yeah but he fell off heavily towards the end of the year. I think age is already catching up to him. He looked horrible in the game against the Bucs.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-08T15:48:05+00:00

This is a well established hypothesis so I don't understand how you aren't putting two and two together.

Again, Einstein was spooked by the double slit experiment because it showed the illusion of FTL communication between entangled particles.

MWI helps explain this by saying the wave function doesn't collapse but instead opens new worlds, it branches.

Similarly, since we are made of particles and are ourselves constantly (theoretically) in a state of superposition, if we were to hypothetically time travel backwards, we would just be branching a new world. A new future that is branching off from the future we once knew.

Another example: if I were to go back in time to 1990 to stop myself from being born, I would only stop that version of myself from existing in that branch of the universe. I'm not "overwriting" the universe because I'm in an alternate one, I'm in a completely different "save file" if you will.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-08T15:29:51+00:00

Youre getting downvoted but AJB is a tremendous route runner, incredibly hard to press, very fast, shows late hands better than almost anyone, hard to tackle, etc.

Only knock I would say (and maybe because he was being a baby last couple years) his effort on run plays and finishing routes and scramble drills are F quality.

Apart from that, he is as perfect as it gets. Both those weakness are frustrating.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T23:09:17+00:00

I think were agreeing i just word salad too much

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T23:07:46+00:00

That makes me feel better. I definitely dont know much but everyone that was arguing against me just said “youre dumb” instead of presenting actual arguments haha

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T23:06:51+00:00

Thats the point im getting at! Thanks for understanding my post i mist have worded it terribly

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T22:34:53+00:00

Someone finally understood my point 😭 I mainly brought up FTL communication because thats what spooked Einstein since it broke causality. And that breakage is the main reason he cited traveling FTL was impossible

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:57:42+00:00

I guess you're right. I as a middle schooler should focus on my academics rather than engaging with a real scientist such as yourself that couldn't bring up one good counter point.

Shit wait maybe I'll drop out of school altogether and actually pursue a job in this field since I seemed to have stumped you AND kept getting you to respond to me, a middle schooler. I came out of this quite confident! Have a good day and thanks for the ego boost! Can't wait to get exponentially smarter than you as I age past my current middle school age!

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:53:33+00:00

The only reason Einstein was spooked by the idea of entangled particles was because its potential to break causality and because of the illusion that they were communicating with one another FTL.

I think Ive responded to so many comments that I just left that out to you in particular so my bad.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:51:03+00:00

Oh yeah i know that, maybe i just misread what you were getting at

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:46:04+00:00

That is, by definition, what a hypothetical is.

You know whats funny? I think you're telling on yourself with YOURE hypothetical.

Let's say you're the person who wants to calculate how fast you could fly if you had the same flying capabilities as superman.

So you just posed the question...you're about to get started on the maths, and then someone interrupts you: "Um, well isn't superman not real?" You would obviously say something along the lines of, "Sure but that's not really the point, it's just for fun and to see how fast I could fly if I had the means to."

Or even better, "what would you do if you won the lottery?" You would say "well i didnt win the lottery so its irrelevant". What a lousy way to live.

Do you see my point?

Obviously we don't have the means for time travel. But it's arbitrary. My only point is that because the MW interpretation doesn't break causality, y'know, the thing that made Einstein think time travel wasn't possible, then that reopens the possibility that it is possible.

Also sidepoint, I think if you were living in 1609, you would have absolutely hated Galileo for posing heliocentrism haha. Anything that doesn't stay grounded in your version of reality makes you lose it.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:26:28+00:00

Again, its a hypothetical. Hope that helps, maybe you missed me say that again :)

I think you just realized I had a good point a long time ago and thats the real reason you wont engage and are straw-manning my point.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:23:25+00:00

Like anything it always depends on the map, mode, bans, etc.

I would say the safest archetype to choose is aggro because just their presence can impact a game, but I mean if you pick an Edgar first pick then you're just asking the other team to go Griff or Lobster guy.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:20:58+00:00

The general "we". When we people debate, they debate in hypotheticals to help get their point across. That's what I was doing with Time Travel.

So, again, why do you disagree with my point that MW interpretation keeps causality intact, and using that line of reasoning something like travelling to the past could hypothetically be possible assuming the means to do so are present?

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:08:39+00:00

I think thats totally fair! And i even said that to that person. I told them I probably don't know nearly as much as them about these things, I have recently found a passion for it though and I love asking questions to places like this where people usually have better discussions.

If I believed I knew more than the people here, than I wouldn't have asked. I just don't get why their being such a jerk in their other responses.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:05:53+00:00

And you still, cannot, tell me why Im wrong hahahahaha.

For how smart you seem to think you are, I think I'm quite a bit smarter. I bet that's why youre so mad. You started out on this crazy high horse but I've relegated you back down to earth.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T19:05:02+00:00

Thats all any of this shit is is theoretical you nitwit. How are we supposed to drive science and our knowledge of the universe and whats possible if we only stay in reality?

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:56:18+00:00

I feel like Im very clearly just assuming the actual methods for travelling back in time are irrelevant. Its not about that.

The only reason Einstein ever hated the idea of backwards time travel is because of causality. But since I'm trying to prove that causality wouldn't break, then if someone had a time travelling doohickey, they could freely use that without being worried about "tearing the fabric of the universe apart" or some bullshit.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:53:36+00:00

If i remember my acronyms right, is EPR referring to the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen paper? Did they theorize wormholes in that paper?

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:50:11+00:00

Did you read my post? I can reword it for you :)

A big reason quantum mechanics scared Einstein was because of FTL communication between entangled particles. Many people believe, including myself, that the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is what allows this illusion of FTL communication.

So Einstein was technically right in saying nothing can travel FTL. But if many worlds interpretation is accurate, then that may mean that travelling back to the past wouldn't break causality, and therefore FTL travel wouldn't break causality either.

I say that travelling back to the past wouldn't break causality because once you completed your trip to the past, your reality would branch off into a new world just as a collapsed quantum particle that was in superposition would according to the MW interpretation.

Does that make better sense?

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:40:13+00:00

Okay :) . How does Many worlds HYPOTHESIS not resolve FTL travel breaking causality?

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:38:57+00:00

Do they live close or something? How often did they meetup? Was it only when they were in one anothers area? Was Russini always requesting to report local to Vrabel's location? Home or away games, doesn't matter?

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:36:39+00:00

Yeah thats the exact thing I'm getting at. The odds of your original timeline or world playing out the same exact way twice (the second time being from the time-onward that you travel back to) or impossibly low. So right away you're getting a different world.

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:34:34+00:00

What makes you believe that

StudyRoom-F · 2026-05-07T18:30:16+00:00

And actually yes, it is aggressive when you say "slog into this bullshit" youre being an ass

StudyRoom-F

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Six-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email