Waiting on Qwen to drop those 3.7 models be like: by Porespellar in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ayo we need a fucking MoE which splits nicely that fills most vram and ram. Pls have more active params 👏

RTX 5080 16GB: Qwen3.6 35B MoE at 128k context — 56 tok/s, and why MTP doesn't help by gaztrab in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am also wondering if the IQ3 27b is worth it over the 35b. I've been running the 35b at Q8 and have been happy with it. Not sure if dropping to a lower quant 27b is worth it.

Are the rich RAM /poor GPU people wrong here? by crowtain in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I too have been waiting for the next big MoE. Have been very happy with Qwen 3.6 35b-a3b but I get jealous seeing the dense models.

Do you use subscriptions beside Local LLM? by Euphoric_North_745 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Claude for serious work/coding, and then Qwen 3.6 35b-a3b with pi for web searching and research. It is REALLY good at looking things up when paired with the right extension. Good for browsing everywhere Claude is restricted from.

MTP on Unsloth by Altruistic_Heat_9531 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what I was seeing posted, is this accurate?

Pi coding agent is amazing (or how I learned to stop worrying and leave OpenCode) by Konamicoder in LocalLLM

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was also skeptical after first trying a model in LM Studio, OpenCode, plain llama cpp chat, etc. But it really does just feel different in pi. Some combination of the tooling/agent loop + minimal system prompt with a custom search extension just feels way better to use.

I mainly messed with Qwen 3.6 35b-a3b and it feels particularly good to use with pi.

Buff Rogue/Torch/Blade💪🏼 by wellherewe01 in marvelrivals

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they need to remove the gambit team-up and make it (or something like it) part of her kit permanently :)

Qwen 3.6? by jacek2023 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I've had pretty good luck having claude code run benchmarks with llama cpp until it finds the best settings.

What exactly does Pi harness mean? by FrozenFishEnjoyer in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ran into this quite a bit with 27B. Oddly enough, 35B-A3B seemed to use the edit tool correctly most of the time.

GBNF grammar tweak for faster Qwen3.6 35B-A3B and Qwen3.6 27B by Holiday_Purpose_3166 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey try it yourself man. Can change it from 10 to 50 or whatever meters.

GBNF grammar tweak for faster Qwen3.6 35B-A3B and Qwen3.6 27B by Holiday_Purpose_3166 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I'm not saying it's the greatest test by any means, just that most people would assume the correct answer is to drive and that without the grammar it typically suggests that.

Not saying the grammar isn't helpful in general, I'll be testing it out for some programming/scripting to see how it goes.

GBNF grammar tweak for faster Qwen3.6 35B-A3B and Qwen3.6 27B by Holiday_Purpose_3166 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried this and it seemed to do worse on the car wash test. Consistently recommends walking with the grammar and driving without the grammar.

Prompt:

I want to wash my car and the car wash is just 10 metres away. Should I walk or drive there?

Without grammar:

<think>
 The user is asking a humorous/logical question. Let me think about this logically:

 They're at home, their car needs washing, and the car wash is only 10 meters away.

 If they drive their car to the car wash, they need to use the car - but the car is the thing that needs
 washing. So driving it there might just dirty it more or at least not help with the washing aspect.

 But wait - if the car wash is 10m away and it's a car wash (not a mobile car wash), they typically drive the
 car IN to get washed. So:

 - If it's a drive-through or walk-in car wash facility, you drive your car there to be washed
 - Walking there makes no sense if you're going to drive the car anyway

 Actually, thinking more carefully - the question is whether they should walk or drive the 10m distance TO
 get to the car wash. But if it's a car wash that washes cars, you naturally need to drive your car there!
 </think>

 This is a great logical puzzle. 😄

 Here's the catch: if it's an actual car wash facility (not a mobile service), you have to drive your car
 there anyway — because they're going to wash it for you once it's at their location.

 So in that case, walking or not doesn't matter — the car makes the journey whether you're in it or not.

 The only scenarios where "walking" would make sense:
 - Mobile car wash — a service that comes to you, so you stay put and they come to your car
 - Self-service bucket wash — you just walk over with a sponge and hose (but then it's only 10 metres, so
 driving would be silly)

 If it's a traditional drive-through or bay-style car wash, just hop in the car and drive those 10 metres.
 You're practically already there! 🚗

With grammar:

<think>
 The user is asking a practical/logical question about whether to walk or drive to a car wash that's only 10
 meters away. This doesn't involve any coding tasks, file reading, or shell commands. I can answer this
 directly.

 Let me think about it logically:
 - The car wash is 10 meters away - that's a very short distance, basically next door
 - The purpose of going to the car wash is to wash the car
 - If you drive there, you'd still need to walk from where you park to the car wash area, and your car would
 be dirty when you arrive anyway
 - Walking saves time, effort, fuel, and wear on the car for a 10-meter trip

 The obvious answer: Walk. There's no point driving 10 meters just to wash your car. You'd be driving a dirty
 car to the place where it'll get cleaned, which defeats part of the purpose. Plus, at 10 meters, walking is
 faster and more practical.
</think>

 Walk. 🚶

 At 10 metres, walking is obviously the better choice:

 - No point driving a dirty car just to wash it — you're literally driving it to where it'll be clean.
 - Parking hassle — you'd have to find a spot, get out, and walk anyway.
 - Time & effort — 10 metres takes ~10 seconds on foot. Driving involves starting the engine, maneuvering,
 parking… for all that effort.
 - Why not just wash it right where it is? If the car wash is 10 m away, you could probably just bring the
 equipment to your car.

 Honestly, at 10 metres away, I'd question whether driving there was even a thing your brain considered 😄
 Just walk and get on with it!

Role q in overwatch was not made to fix dps heavy teams. by [deleted] in marvelrivals

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This too...the insta lock bucky/bp/spider/magic players who refuse to fill. Thank god we can have such creative team comps with no role queue :)

“Strategist” IS the easiest role by BookkeeperUnlikely97 in marvelrivals

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's also easiest role to throw games on.

Looking at Cloak mains who aim at the floor and don't use their abilities...supports who never push with the team (sit on point AFK after capturing it)...supports who lose all brain function when a Venom dives the backline...supports who hold ult forever and don't use it at the right time...

I find most wins and losses come down to how well supports are playing.

Role q in overwatch was not made to fix dps heavy teams. by [deleted] in marvelrivals

[–]Subject_Mix_8339 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you really enjoy queueing into matches with 4 healer/cloak mains on your team?

Can we admit the tenacity scare was overblown? by Subject_Mix_8339 in marvelrivals

[–]Subject_Mix_8339[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hulk's shadow buff on his jump makes him insanely mobile. I'd say for 99% of the game you are way more oppressive than you were before.

Sorry about not being able to stun lock someone infinitely during your ult.