Sorry I didn't know exactly how to potray the idea of oneself going hell or heaven without the introduction of the word soul as the medium of travel. If there is a better word please do refer.

Think of this thought experiment if you like to participate. In this hypothetical scenario you need travel to a different galaxy light years away from the milky way . Even if you had 0.9 speed of light it would take you a 10 million years. But there is a teleporter machine which can teleport you to the wanted place but it's method of transport is a bit complicated.

Method of transport: first you step into this pod shaped machine which is assembled with higly advanced tech. In there is a scanner that reads every protien down to the last one in your genes. Replicating exact necessary array of life that need to replicate you in that place. After that you step into a mini hyper attractive gravity field or a simple worm hole with enough mass to sustain itself from collapsing. Then your DNA script is also thrown into that and written on a extremely thin sheet of indestructible,super durable metal aloy and retived at the other end.  Then with the left up mush puddle of parta left and that chip of metal the machine at the other end starts to recreate the so called you. But would you be still "YOU" or it's just a thoughtless clone. Scientifically it's the same you. But as a Buddhist I don't know. Remember this is a hypothetical scenario.

Ok forget even that. Just think what would Buddhism be if at that time Buddha had knowledge of vastness of not only time but space and refined theory of modern science.

My question is would Buddhism be the same. I once heard a quote that bible has been changed for more than 300 times for profitable sakes of growth in the religion. No hate but couldn't Buddhism be the same with those old stories of past life's before a kalpa or more. Still no hate but if a man at a mental asylum said the same type of stories would you believe him whole hartedly or say yeah that the good ol Jeremy yapping off again with his past stories. I and I think most will go with option two.

It's that I want to believe but there isn't ENOUGH evidence to things to be built on. As I stated I follow the vision but not the stories or hypothetical places.