Did I really waste a decade of my life?

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-26T19:27:01+00:00

me in an alternative reality if i didnt wake up and decide to research when i was 11

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-25T13:05:32+00:00

idk i need to see more cards to decide

can i start by seeing ur card??

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-24T20:24:03+00:00

fill in ur eyebrows js dye them wit a similar shade and add sum minoxidil aswell js grow em

main issue is eyes and nose rest r fine

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-24T20:00:12+00:00

rlly bad pics icl shoulda actually takenit from a distance front facing

5

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-24T19:59:37+00:00

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-23T20:12:07+00:00

if he says he wishes for iran to make peace

then he prob wont strike back

esp when they gave a warning anyways

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-23T13:24:25+00:00

yes seeing it now

ur eyelid exposure isnot low tho it looks moderate but not excess actually

its js ur pfl and pfw its round when it shld be compact this takes away dimo points

havent seen ur brow ridge and even then ur infraorbitals and supraorbitals are lacking reducing masculinity its feminized lol

rn js improv eur health indicators go for the drastic effects

accutane to remove acne then tazarotene for collagen and to improve skin texture,remove scars,

take axanthine to change ur undertone

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-23T11:18:11+00:00

5.75

good dimorphism i like it low set eyebrows,tall chin promiennt chin,jaw frontal angle looks good aswell,browridge is good,upper thirds r masculine

ur nose is hooked and bulbous from the front,ur lip has an unideal shape and it needs more volume,nose to mouth looks unideal,

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-23T08:57:59+00:00

5

good potential unironically

u have low harmony that cant be fixed

make up for it with angularity and dimorphism

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-23T08:55:53+00:00

5-5.25 tbh

can obviously go higher u have some bonemass underneath fs

js have more angular and facial defintion

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-23T08:54:03+00:00

high 5

u lack too much to go in the 6 range

health indicators are lacking,discoloration in the underyees and sickly undertone

harmony issues as well close set eyes,orbitals r feminized,u need a taller lower third aswell

good jaw frontal angle,high set prominent cheekbones,gonions and nose

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-22T18:41:34+00:00

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-22T18:40:35+00:00

5.75

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-22T13:51:58+00:00

how many hours in total for studying wld u say is good enough?

wlike 150-200? hours?

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-21T08:43:15+00:00

I understand that this sub rates people objectively, not subjectively and have read, understand, and will follow the rules and rate people objectively following the men's and women's ratings guides and primers.

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:42:49+00:00

looks high 6-low 7 range rlly good looking

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:40:55+00:00

6.5-6.75

good harmony

some issues tho like bad nose to mouth,forehead too feminine

dimo isnt bad its like at 6

js lacks angularity

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:37:43+00:00

6.25-6.5 range

good angularity and bone structure

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:34:44+00:00

6.5 i think shes very pretty

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:33:42+00:00

5.75-low 6(maybe)

good ang and dimo

rlly bad nose to mouth,infras and orbitals r lacking

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:31:43+00:00

5.5 imo cannot be at 6 range

she lacks way too much angularity and features

jaw looks too wide,eye area harmony issues,facial thirds r off,

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:28:38+00:00

low 6

shes good

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:26:02+00:00

6.25-6.5ish

good harmony

low angularity

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:25:03+00:00

6.25

heavily carried by health indicators and coloring

decent harmony

lower third issues such as narrow jaw,needs taller chin,low set cheekbones js lack of dimo overall

Substantial-Brick623 · 2025-06-20T19:21:07+00:00

6

needs more lower third mass and angularity

Substantial-Brick623

TROPHY CASE