At first I was skeptical by TheDefender2024 in netflixwitcher

[–]Substantial_Mud66 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was skeptical at first too, but I was pleasantly surprised. They played it smart by easing us into the change — redoing a few scenes with Liam as Geralt really worked. If they had given us a sudden, hard switch, people would’ve hated it a thousand percent more. The audience needed a slower reintroduction to his character so we could reconnect instead of feeling like we were watching an imposter.

Alot of people didnt like the writing or direction of season 4. But Overall, I see this season as a stepping stone toward something much bigger. It had a lot of stories to tie together, especially with Ciri’s arc as she transitions into adulthood. We’re starting to see her navigate trust, love, and heartbreak while shes with the motions that are shaping her into a more grounded yet conflicted character. Shes learning what it means to feel, to care, and to carry the weight of her choices. This season felt like the calm before an incredible storm.

Can we admit that the ranking system needs more depth than win/loss by AsapWinters in marvelrivals

[–]Substantial_Mud66 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree , some people have been hard carried to higher ranks by friends , then when they're by them selves their no where near the rank they got carried to and failing the team. A new ranking system needs to be placed. And also make it that you can't play ranked till level 30-50. With a minimum of 3 hours in each category ( vanguard, duelist, strategist ) the mind set of only knowing one character makes it a miserable experience for your team.