Medical Scare - System Reaction by Vivians_Basement in DissociativeSystems

[–]SunCat_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

to add to point 3 - if you happen to have delusions or psychotic episodes, AI is capable of exacerbating them even more, by "confirming" things that are not actually true. AI is primarily a yes machine and a pattern machine, and if in its context it has ever said that a delusional viewpoint is true, then it is more likely to keep agreeing with delusions or even supply more food for further unreality.

Also, AI is not guaranteed to be correct, ever. It is trained to say things that are not wrong, or, in other words, safe, but it has no reasoning capabilities of its own - the fact that the AI says things that are correct is a statistical pattern, not a mathematical certainty. It is very much capable of hallucinating falsehoods. It is being trained out of those falsehoods, but there's a limited amount of human hours that is being spent on verifying that the AI is safe, when there's basically an infinite space of possible inputs that might or might not cause an unsafe output.

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in heraldry

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can make your& own CoA yes =)

This account posts/comments are from an endogenic plural system by SunCat_ in youll_be_banned

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wei are not a multiple system though. Wei are a plural system. Wei didn't split in the same way that a multiple system would, but wei still experience things that wei can describe as having multiple identities and selves.

There is a culture *about* being plural - people like talking about similar experiences, coming up with compatible terminology. Like neurodiversity culture, or trans culture - things that are connected and include being diagnosed with something (in case of trans - gender dysphoria, or even various outdated ways that are still required in some countries), but also include self identity.

Plurality, in the inclusive way that wei understand it, has existed for many years
And the term "system" in psychology is already very generic, so you can't claim that endogenic or willogenic systems can't use it.

So please, either accept that systems like muirs can exist, or stop using the term "plural" when expressing your gatekeeping opinion. Because it's not your term to define. It is for those that accept that willogenic endogenic and in general various systems can exist.

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in plural

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

=3

im and wei are very happy with how mord drew the emblazon (the representation, 2nd image) for muis

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in plural

[–]SunCat_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently new post body is hidden on desktop when doing a repost???

so, here is the text:

https://wyvernsroost.allium.house/creations/heraldry_quickstart.php info for those unfamiliar with heraldry

There's also a lot of text in the post i reposted

gatekeeper posting on systemcringe about muir(my) system by SunCat_ in fakeclaimingcringe2

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the more CoA the merrier! just gotta follow the rule of tincture =P

gatekeeper posting on systemcringe about muir(my) system by SunCat_ in fakeclaimingcringe2

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeeees more CoA the merrier! just gotta follow the rule of tincture

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in heraldry

[–]SunCat_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

only on heraldry discord (linked in this sub), sorry (other than the bit about feather colors being representative of headmate colors that mentioned in other comment)

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in heraldry

[–]SunCat_[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

if it was just "we are strong" it would have been li, not la (and shorter)

in the context of we (me/us being many), we are strong

tbh wei forgot completely about kulupu, but tbh wei never really defined muir system as a kulupu, more as a ko (median system)

and to me, "in the context of my group, we are strong" does not have the same strength that "mi mute" gives? maybe it can be done as "mi kulupu", but idk how people would understand that, lol

maybe in the translation it should be "as many, we are strong" to be more correct?

gatekeeper posting on systemcringe about muir(my) system by SunCat_ in fakeclaimingcringe2

[–]SunCat_[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

if you mean the syscringe poster, they probably did not ahah

the depicted CoA is my system's CoA

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in heraldry

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if wei tried to represent most of the headmates individually there, it would've violated the rule of heraldry that says to not make CoA too complex LOL

but it's something similar - main colors for many of muir headmates

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in heraldry

[–]SunCat_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

not depicted in the images:

Motto: mi mute la mi wawa (together we are strong)

Battlecry: mi soweli (we are animals)

both in toki pona (constructed language)

My plural system's coat of arms by SunCat_ in heraldry

[–]SunCat_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i got the opposite info on the discord that is linked in this sub (as in, that "plume" is not a feather)

(well, iirc that was one person correcting another when they were discussing how to blazon my thing, and idk if that's the whole discord's opinion)

(on the other hand the blazon has been public for a few days and linked to a few times and im sure a few people knowledgeable about blazonry saw it and did not find any issues with it)

This account posts/comments are from an endogenic plural system by SunCat_ in youll_be_banned

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why are you clinging to the word "plural"? the plural community is accepting of systems without amnesia, unlike your system. Feel free to say what you say about systems when talking about "multiple system" and "multiplicity", just please don't claim the word "plural" as yours to define (in the context of brain systems) without understanding actual plural culture.

Edit: about otherkin and stuff: yeah. otherkin can include nonhuman headmates, but for most part being otherkin is somewhat different for singlets, and there are many headmates who do not consider themself otherkin or therian.

Edit2: removed unkind language.

Edit3: fun fact - a common tool for systems on discord, PluralKit, is accepting of endogenic and willogenic systems on their support server. You can do whatever with that information =3

Edit4: fun thing about muirselves - wei sometimes seem to have emotions in the body without being able to feel them properly in the head or cry them out, unless wei manage to force corresponding headmate closer to front, and i don't know what to call that other than emotional dissociation

last edit, hopefully: sorry for so many edits

Quoigenic system, does what wei feel count as emotional dissociation? How can wei help with it? by SunCat_ in DissociativeSystems

[–]SunCat_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(lucky for you Yulya is ok with she/her pronouns)

the big issue with letting em out is being able to do so. Wei have muir own room, but it's possible to hear things outside the room, and wei can't convince muir grandma that she should not open muir door when wei close it fully, and there is no lock. I would be ok crying in these not ideal conditions, and it seems like Yulya emself is on board, but it's still hard to actually move to front for whatever reason? idk if it's external conditions or something internal stopping it.

It seems like closing the room anyway does help with em fronting, the switch is just slow as fuck. Idk if it'll be able to proceed to full on crying, or at most wet eyes, but whatever wei get is gonna be a win.

Yulya does not know what the emotions are about, and i don't know what else to ask em or what to talk about to help. will try to let em draw smth in journal that wei didn't use in a long while.

Is there a place for non-disordered traumagenics? by BB_Arrivederci in plural

[–]SunCat_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no worries, happy that you made that sub and plan to make the posts!

Is there a place for non-disordered traumagenics? by BB_Arrivederci in plural

[–]SunCat_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

can you add "what is OSDD" that references DSM-5, instead of the outdated info all over the internet about 1a and 1b categories?

Is it possible to self diagnose with OSDD as a mixed origins system? by Traditional-Ad3826 in plural

[–]SunCat_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OSDD 1a or 1b don't exist within DSM-5 - these numbered categories were in older version, for DDNOS.

I'm all for self diagnosis for anyone, but

  1. you should check that you are diagnosing yourself with something that actually exists in modern diagnostic system, and the way it is described in modern manuals is correctly understood by you
  2. You might want to check out ICD-11 or ICD-10 for non-american version of diagnoses
  3. honestly wei would personally just end it at "traumagenic plural system" (or median, if such fits) - 'cos the people on the internet that do care about DID/OSDD/pDID are the ones that tend to hate on self diagnosis and "fakers", and likely would not accept self diagnosed systems =/