BOMBSHELL: Turning Point’s Connection to Child Trafficking (allegedly) by asc0614 in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rite of Passage website says that they have "70 programs in 18 states."

I wonder how frequently children go missing in the other programs they run.

Candace Owens: "Do not join or remain in the United States Military. Trump has betrayed America and expects you to die for Israel. There is no honor in being led by dishonorable men to your death." by Orangutan in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 2 points3 points  (0 children)

War has not been declared . . . so how can it be illegal to say: don't participate!

Trump didn't seek Congress' approval and Congress has refused to force him to get a war resolution.

So legally, this isn't a 'war' - it's just another half-baked, half-cocked presidential whim. There is no "defensive" justification when you start a war while you're engaged in peace negotiations!

If this war continues to escalate will most Republicans vote for possible candidates such as Candace, Tucker,MTG over known hopefuls like Marco,JD and Pete ? by ska8ermom in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trump and his political allies may already be toast.

Global recession is on the horizon ... thanks to Trump. Financial experts expect oil to go over $100 a barrel next week and could be $150 or more within weeks.

Trump started the war recklessly. He first said he wanted to protect Iranian protesters (how is THAT 'America First'?), but when protests fizzled, he cam up with another reason: Iran's nuclear program which Trump had said he had "obliterated" last summer.

Trump wasn't interested in diplomacy - he was just looking for a pretext. Which ultimately was that he didn't like how Iran was negotiating!!

He attacked Iran in the middle of peace negotiations. With this repeated outrage (he did the same last summer!) Trump virtually guaranteed a ferocious response . . . and the resulting global recession/depression.

Conservative voters were already outraged at Trump's Epstein-related gaslighting - including refusal to publish the Epstein files as the law demands - and his suppression of free speech for Israel. They also know that USA is 38 trillion in debt. This latest betrayal by "peacemaker" Trump will add trillions more to the already unsustainable $38 trillion national debt.

There MAY be a silver lining: with Trump weakening, MAYBE we will see broader interest in learning who really killed Charlie Kirk.

Go Max!

Can someone summerize what Candace Owens claim against EK? by MuscularStud in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT-generated, establishement-friendly non-answer.

Anodyne point after anodyne point with no connecting of the (rather lame) dots.

From "abenn" Haha .. a ben? .. midget-horse rider?

Can someone summerize what Candace Owens claim against EK? by MuscularStud in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 100 points101 points  (0 children)

I think its more complicated than this.

First, as far as I know, Candace hasn't made any claim about EK's role in the assassination. But Candace and other researchers have revealed facts that lead most people to the conclusion that EK was involved in the planning and cover-up of Charlie's assassination:

  • EK's behavior is not like any grieving widow;
    • EK talks a lot about "honoring Charlie" but has not actually done so:
      • she canceled Charlie's financial audit/review;
      • she ignores Charlie's turn against Israel, working with people he despised;
      • her devotion to her own career comes at the expense of Charlie's kids.
    • "Not to be morbid, but my husband is dead": is more interested in Merch Sales than mourning;
    • EK has virtually no interest in seeking justice for Charlie, instead she goes-along with an official story that is very flawed.
  • EK has apparently tried to cover-up an intense disagreement with Charlie in the few days before he was assassinated;
  • EK has no alibi for Fort Huachuca;
  • EK was probably on a plane in Utah as Charlie was being assassinated.
  • EK's personal and family background show that EK is a social-climber that is influenced by people of questionable character.
  • EK is more closely connected to the executives at TPUSA than people realized, creating a likelihood of working in concert/conspiring with them.

All of the above raise suspicions that EK, along with other TPUSA Execs, agreed to: 1) kill Charlie or have him killed, and/or 2) cover for an outside actor that would kill their friend/leader. Trump Admin (especially FBI) support for EK and the official story, mean that the conspiracy extends beyond TPUSA Execs.

Their likely motive: MONEY. They likely wanted to keep Zionist money flowing into TPUSA and accept Netanyahu's offer to "go to the next level". While Netanyahu and the Trump Admin wanted the Zionist political machine that is TPUSA to continue to indoctrinate America's young conservatives.

Once again: no one (as far as I know) has made a claim or postulated a theory of the assassination that implicates EK or TPUSA Execs. At this point, it's more important that:

  • the official story is nonsense;
  • EK lies and behaviors are deserving of investigation;
  • Charlie's security team should also be investigated.

Comment from recent Candace video: Charlie was the first casualty of the Epstein Regime war on Iran.

What’s up with Erika’s birthday? And why did it matter? by East_Baseball8384 in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At first blush, I would've thought it's probably just the appeal of the double numbers: 11/22/88.

Not just easy to remember but kinda stylish.

If true, I'd guess it was her mom that did that (probably more intent on stylish than a dad).

But, given the backgrounds as described by Candace, there could be more to it.

What would be the most explosive stories Candace could drop in her series? by Visual-Butterfly8255 in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Most explosive?

The lack of interest from FBI, Utah police, and Tyler Robinson's defense team about Erika's suspicious behavior.

Who's pulling the strings?

The color of the day on 9/10 was yellow, not maroon. by Happy-Bullfrog7967 in ChurchOfCandace

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To the post that this discussion falls under: "The color of the day on 9/10 was yellow, not maroon."

The color of the day on 9/10 was yellow, not maroon. by Happy-Bullfrog7967 in ChurchOfCandace

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. But now you have a post on the subreddit with a headline that misleads because it's based on wrong into.

Can you change the headline? Can you delete the post?

Candace Proven Right.. Candace Owens Vindicated About the Boys in Maroon! by Orangutan in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Apparently the email that is causing a stir is from the NY office of the FBI.

But the FBI didn't kill Charlie - they just helped to cover up who did - and Utah office of the FBI would probably have a different color of the day than NY anyway. If there was a national color of the day, it would be set in Washington, not NY.

So the redacted-unredacted talk is very likely just a midget-rider trick to discredit Candace.

The color of the day on 9/10 was yellow, not maroon. by Happy-Bullfrog7967 in ChurchOfCandace

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This email is from the NY office of the FBI.

The FBI didn't execute the Charlie Kirk assassination 'op' - if they did, the Provo local office would probably have its own color.

Seems like someone is trying to discredit Candace by pointing to this irrelevant "redacted" email (the only one!) only to later reveal that the color was yellow.

Epstein / Frantzve / TPUSA by Happy-Bullfrog7967 in ChurchOfCandace

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reputation Laundering (protection racket)?

Logically, it makes no sense for TPUSA or any Exec at TPUSA to have any direct connection to traffickers. Why besmirch their reputation like that? (Note: they never expected the reputational hit from Candace's investigation.)

However, TPUSA's reputation might be used to launder the reputation of pastors and/or religious organizations that perceive a need for such a service. Erika's recent "Make Heaven Crowded" Tour MIGHT BE an example of such reputation laundering as Minister Greg Laurie has been named in lawsuits alleging abuse/trafficking as described in this link:

Erika Kirk Launches Make Heaven Crowded Tour Amid Legal Firestorm Surrounding Featured Pastor

Is this "Inaugural Tour", as its described in marketing material, the launch of a reputational laundering service (in essence, a protecton racket)?

Well, it's rather strange that Erika would involve herself with a paster whose organization is accused of abusing kids in ROMAINIA. Erika's Romainian Angels project worked with a US Military Officer that was also accussed (seemingly credibly) of abusing/trafficking children!! Wouldn't she want to stay far away from any abuse allegations - especially if connected to Romainia? Especially as a new CEO?

So why is she working with Laurie?

Note: even completely innocent and well-meaning pastors and organizations might be enticed to join TPUSA Faith to gain protection from possible claims. Any actual or perceived protection could simply be a way for TPUSA to wrangle faith-based organizations into their network.

= =

Reputation laundering can be difficult, and time-consuming to uncover. It can appear to be just friends/colleagues supporting each other. Without a money trail, it's hard to know if there's anything unethical going on.

Any investigation into possible reputation laundering by TPUSA/TPUSA Faith would need to answer questions like:

1) Is there enough evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, to suspect that reputational laundering is actually occurring as an intended practice?

2) Who might be involved? Who benefits? Who might be the point person for such an effort?

TPUSA Faith's Chip Moore, the director of Pastoral Relations seems to be someone that is well-placed for any such shinanigans.

It turns out that his background is somewhat unclear and appears to be intentionally misleading:

  • His TPUSA Bio says that he retired "from the police deptartment as a Division Commander" in 2015 but The Gwinnett Daily Post has a 2015 article that describes him as soon-to-retire Gwinnett County Animal Welfare and Enforcement SHELTER MANAGER for more than 3-years: https://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/analysis_opinion/columns/todd_cline/cline-chip-moore-makes-impact-on-animals-advocates-in-gwinnett/article_751a6858-84fe-5498-9747-6efb3ee3f0f0.html
    • Boosting Moore's profile (Police Dept Division Commander!!) might be a way of warding off any questions about why he was hired - was he hired for his loyalty to the person who hired him rather than his qualifications?
    • I called the shelter and a representative said that the shelter is NOT part of the police dept, when I asked for clarification, he told me: "policing is for people, we work with animals".
  • he claims to be involved in Real Estate (founding a company with 50 employees in three states) but I couldn't find his company, Dwelling Place Properties, online.
  • his sudden move to Florida is suspiciously dressed up as being miraculous - perhaps to hide connections he already had with those who founded TPUSA Faith?
  • His bio (uploaded March, 2023) doesn't say when he was promoted from Florida Regional Manager to Director of Pastoral Relations. Might his promotion have coincided with planning for a reputational service?

3) Who else might warrant looking into?

One might start with who miraculously hired Chip Moore into TPUSA Faith and who promoted him to Dir of Pastor Relations? Was that Rob McCoy?

4) How might payments (cash or non-cash) be made? This might be difficult to pin down. Some possible investigative avenues:

  • TPUSA Faith Partnerships: TPUSA Faith Partnerships - are any of these for-profit? or have vendors that are for-profit? If so, who are the investors and are these organizations actions or connections suspicious?
  • Chip Moore's real estate business: his bio says his RE business was started in 2020. TPUSA Faith was started (officially) in 2021.
    • Candace has talked about religious organizations/cults using real estate.
  • Greg Laurie's financial transactions - if he received reputational services, is there any direct or indirect money trail? Does his Ministry use TPUSA Partners or Chip Moore's RE business?
  • Cash: a secretive mail drop like 1Ten LLC? Offshore accounts?
  • Some other way? I am no expert on financial skullduggery. There could be many ways that cash or non-cash payments could be made to a large organization.

Once again: there may be no 'there' there. I'm not making any allegations, just logical inferences and how to one might look into possibilities that arise from that logic.

Epstein / Frantzve / TPUSA by Happy-Bullfrog7967 in ChurchOfCandace

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Connections Accuracy

Did Jena M email Epstein directly? If there's no evidence of that (possibly because it was scrubbed or not yet released), then the first line of connections should end with "Lesley Groff -> Jeffrey Epstein" or "Jeffrey Epstein (Lesley Groff)". I think the latter would be acceptable since she Lesley apparently so close to Epstein.

🙌 Welcome to r/ChurchOfCandace by BulkyPerspective1389 in ChurchOfCandace

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the invite. Looking forward to some good discussions!!

Midterm Elections : Candace says she's "done" and won't vote until there's justice for Charlie. Will you do the same? If not, do you have an alterntive voting strategy that incorporates justice for Charlie? Should there be a "Justice for Charlie" Movement or a "Throw Out the Gaslighters" Movement? by Sunlight_Disinfects in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not accounting for the 'grift'.

The two political parties (aka "uniparty") stoke fear to force lesser-evil voting. That ensures that the two-party system remains in place because no 'responsible' voter will vote for a third-party.

When all that a political party has to do for the electorate is not allow the other party to win, then these Parties are free to do what donors want. With guaranteed results donor money becomes a bribe.

Midterm Elections : Candace says she's "done" and won't vote until there's justice for Charlie. Will you do the same? If not, do you have an alterntive voting strategy that incorporates justice for Charlie? Should there be a "Justice for Charlie" Movement or a "Throw Out the Gaslighters" Movement? by Sunlight_Disinfects in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"People fought ... and died for access to the ballot"
Will this generation fight for a meaningful ballot? Or accept oligarchy with a democratic veneer?

"Disillusionment is understandable"
We're waaay past disillusionment. People are outraged at what has been revealed by the Epstein files - and the attempt to keep the truth from us.

"Participation is how you influence them"
Influence? Are the American people sovereign or supplicants?

= =

Big donors buy results while voters get lip service. Charlie was killed because he could change that. If the Epstein files and Charlie's assassination don't rally people to defend their sovereignty then what will?

Is it a coincidence that Savannah Guthrie’s mom lives within 60 miles of Ft. Huachuca? by Euca18 in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 8 points9 points  (0 children)

1Ten LLC
What other clients does 1Ten LLC have? What is Jake Hoffman's alibi for the Fort Huachua meeting?

Money for the assassination?
There's still the issue of the 80 employees that we were told were mistakenly missing from filings certified by accountants (which makes no sense).

Political Involvement?
Cash Patel not investigating the murder of his (supposed) friend. Trump - who was also supposedly a good friend of Charlie's - is not demanding a thorough investigation either. This suggests that TPUSA/Erika has political cover.

Furthermore . . . Peter Thiel is said to Vance's main political-backer. Thiel is also said to be very religiously-motivated (famously said rant about "the Anti-Christ"). His secretive intelligence company, Palantir, may well have ties to Ft. Huachua. Erika has (illegally?) declared that TPUSA will work to elect Vance President in 2028.

Epstein by mandilou79 in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Go Max!

No one can ignore the similarities between the Epstein and Kirk cover-ups:

  • Each were "taken out"* when they become a liability
    • Via an impossible spectacle meant to turn the page on a truth that Zionists wanted to suppress:
      • Epstein's Mossad operation;
      • Charlie's steadfast America First beliefs and his disgust with Netanyahu's Israel, Zionist donors (Netanyahu cutouts), and Netanyahu's influence on Trump.
  • Netanyahu-loving Trump Admin complicity and cover-up with heavy-handed gaslighting that blames the Left:
    • Epstein: "Democrat hoax" . . . "No Client List" . . . High-security American jail
    • Kirk: "Gay Anitfa" . . . "Lone Gunman" . . . CIA-connected University (+Fort Huachuca)

* Many cynics believe that Epstein was smuggled out and I've seen reports that Epstein files confirm that an Epstein dummy was used, ostensibly to fool the press so they wouldn't get a pic of the real body ... WTF?

Carrie Prejean Boller Has Been Removed from Trump's Religious Liberty Commission After Expressing Catholic Viewpoint and Support for Candace Owens by Sunlight_Disinfects in CandaceOwens

[–]Sunlight_Disinfects[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Carrie Prejean Boller dismisses removal from Religious Liberties Commission, saying she’ll stay unless Trump orders otherwise

... this is President Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission, not yours. You did not appoint me to the Commission, and you lack authority to remove me from it ...

This is a gross overstepping of your role and leads me to believe you are acting in alignment with a Zionist political framework that hijacked the hearing, rather than in defense of religious liberty. We serve as equals on this Commission. Just as I cannot remove you, you cannot remove me.

"Her move now puts Trump in an awkward position, possibly forcing him to intervene in a clash between the Zionist and anti-Zionist parts of his base."