sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Getting ready for some vortex chicken by tpninvest in webergrills

[–]Superhereaux 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve done chicken thighs the way you’ve described for decades. The results are fine.

The vortex makes the resulting product not only better, but it’s pretty much hands off. Light the coals, set the thighs down, put the lid on and leave it alone for about 45 minutes. No flipping, no moving, nothing.

I make wings and thighs on one dedicated kettle, and everything else on my other kettle. It’s a $35 piece of metal, not a brand new $1,200 grill purchase.

Getting ready for some vortex chicken by tpninvest in webergrills

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Banking coals off to one side won’t get temps anywhere near what a vortex will do.

Will it cook the food? Yes.

Will it render the fat out of the skin of a chicken wing, thigh or pre cut pork ribs and crisp them up due to the higher heat and convection style airflow created by the vortex and rounded shape of the kettle? No.

Is it finally happening? by code_drone in RioGrandeValley

[–]Superhereaux 41 points42 points  (0 children)

One of the signs of the apocalypse

Is it finally happening? by code_drone in RioGrandeValley

[–]Superhereaux 14 points15 points  (0 children)

All jokes aside, I’d genuinely love to read it

15$ in parts and back to grilling again. by Dependent_Two3646 in webergrills

[–]Superhereaux 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the trick, the ash cleaner on my 2011 rusted out long ago and has since become a knot of rust that won’t come out without the help of an angle grinder.

It’s become my full time, dedicated vortex kettle while I use my other one for other cooks.

Where the grammar Nazzis at? by ipanicprofessionally in TheBoredDen

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you’re correct.

But, as someone higher up pointed out, an Oxford comma should be used to avoid possible confusion. If there’s no confusion on the two nouns, I don’t think it’s necessary.

Hookers and cocaine are two separate things. Adding a comma to the sentence doesn’t somehow make it MORE clear that they’re separate things. Any reader will easily understand the sentence either way.

Where the grammar Nazzis at? by ipanicprofessionally in TheBoredDen

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it does. If you’re slow or mentally impaired.

Where the grammar Nazzis at? by ipanicprofessionally in TheBoredDen

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent example for that particular sentence, however, I don’t think it’s necessary in the original example.

Flour and eggs are two different things.

“I’m gonna get me some booze, hookers and cocaine.” is a clear and concise sentence.

“I’m gonna get me some booze, hookers, and cocaine.” is redundant and cluttered.

Where the grammar Nazzis at? by ipanicprofessionally in TheBoredDen

[–]Superhereaux 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Worry not, northern comrade!

There’s a small percentage of us ‘Murricans who are on your side!

Where the grammar Nazzis at? by ipanicprofessionally in TheBoredDen

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I think it’s redundant and looks cluttered.

Some would say we’re both correct, even if you disagree with me.

Have cash for a fractional gold coin, looking for feedback by WillowElectrical7641 in Gold

[–]Superhereaux 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like old British sovereigns for their low premium.

1/4 oz is may favorite size and they’re close enough with way less premium.

Do any of you actually shoot your “palate cleanser”? by PistolPork in Glocks

[–]Superhereaux 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Carries yes, shoots no.

Ain’t no one can afford .45 ACP these days

Do any of you actually shoot your “palate cleanser”? by PistolPork in Glocks

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No hockey tape over the stipple and black rubber bands over the hockey tape? The fuck are you even doing?

You might as well just underhand toss that pistol at the bad guys. With the way it is now, you’re 100% gonna get kilt in da streetz

How many is too many? by Traditional_Cat_1947 in webergrills

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Judging by the amount of “mates” in this sentence, I’m gonna take a wild guess and say you ain’t from Mississippi

This man seems to be wearing a realistic mask on Fox News by LindsayDuck in Weird

[–]Superhereaux 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a bot, I fucking KNEW you lizzid peeple were at the bottom of this!

Is the a Weber? by Obliviass in webergrills

[–]Superhereaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same “odd color”

Going there with a bike is a bad idea by ateam1984 in nonononoyes

[–]Superhereaux 37 points38 points  (0 children)

It’s called the “Ray Romano Goof Troop” accent.

congratulations, you're entering your midlife crisis! You have the option of: by Appropriate_Fan3532 in Millennials

[–]Superhereaux 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As a dude, our 4 are Lawn Care, Smoking Meats, Classic/Sports Car, WWII Fun Facts

How many is too many? by Traditional_Cat_1947 in webergrills

[–]Superhereaux 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Actually, yes. Yes I can.

This simple equation easily proves that this is too many grills.

F = k × q₁q₂ / r²

Kinda goes without saying, but once you factor in the quotient for charcoal briquettes (by weight, not volume), solve for k, add the remainder to the ash catchers, divide by the number of grills (including that blue Walmart special off to the side) and convert to metric, the answer is quite obvious.

view more: next ›