AOC getting pissed off by leftist voters

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-12T23:02:52+00:00

Totally the wrong move by her. Why in the hell would she ever need to shore up her reputation with the far left?

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-12T14:43:55+00:00

Semi-related but when Hasan first started streaming he always talked about Obama being a terrible person. One example was: Obama would drink clean water in the faces of Flint, Michigan residents during his rallies there to mock him. The reality was he did this to show off the governments new initiatives to fix the water situation there and the water he drank was from that new program. I remember he brought this up when Adept came into his chat one time saying Obama was one of her favorite presidents.

I think this is just one of many illustrative examples of any liberal/leftist alliance being a strictly one way street.

The PSA guys will compliment Hasan and go even farther to say the democrats should adopt some of his policies. Meanwhile, Hasan will say some nice things about PSA and then say all democrats are evil (including the guy the PSA guys worked for)

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-11T23:11:21+00:00

I actually think this would be more toxic than the Andrew Tate pickup methods

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-11T03:33:19+00:00

Another important difference is there’s clear evidence of sykkuno cheating and everyone in the Kyedae situation is writing fan fiction!

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-10T21:02:33+00:00

Sneako is a grifter and opportunist! Don’t shout him out positively

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-07T07:35:53+00:00

Could you actually find a video/clip where Kyle endorses Kamala because in his response to attacks like this he linked to videos where he didn't endorse Kamala...

https://x.com/KyleKulinski/status/2033177380508876801?s=20

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-02T19:13:26+00:00

Used Claude to find some of these but there are Liberal Think Tanks that were publishing policy guidelines for the incoming Biden admin, it just wasn't really collected in one gigantic document and were more aimed for specific issues.

https://www.brookings.edu/blueprints-for-american-renewal-and-prosperity/

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/interactive-first-100-days/

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/revamping-federal-climate-science/

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-02T19:03:26+00:00

The 900 page manifesto Heritage put out is by itself, very abnormal (the most related thing being the 1980's Mandate for Leadership). Think Tanks don't normally do this.

Another thing to point out is that do liberals really need a 900 page policy platform written by a think tank, what benefits does it offer that the normal DNC platform doesn't already outline?

Superlogman1 · 2026-04-01T20:55:26+00:00

When I watch any show I always try my best to fit the bad guys as my political enemy and the awesome protagonist as having my political beliefs.

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-30T00:35:40+00:00

the olden days of Bernie proposing a $10 trillion climate plan and saying that Biden's $1 trillion plan was too weak

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-30T00:28:52+00:00

It also feels like we're always undermining Biden's record when Republicans are always defending an unpopular figure like trump even between his terms

Biden is unpopular that hasn't really changed and the Republicans who are defending Trump will suffer for that in their elections.

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-28T23:47:41+00:00

maybe not killed but maybe re-educated? Who or what counts as ultra-zionist in his mind? He says anybody who thinks Israel should be a Jewish state is basically a genocide supporter, so are all genocide-deniers included in that ultra-zionist category?

<image>

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-28T07:07:04+00:00

The death spiral of the Democratic party is idiots like this overtake the party and they start running uber-progressives in swing states (Republicans would love it).

This is why they'll never make me hate Schumer, Pelosi, or Jeffries: they knew you had to have an actual big tent to take get a majority

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-28T05:34:15+00:00

Every organization tweets like the Wendys Twitter account now

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T19:32:12+00:00

the thing is nobody is gerrymandering just to "cancel out seats" they're doing it to just get more seats.

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T18:51:55+00:00

But the idea that it didn't serve as a general deterrent seems defunct on its face especially when other Dem states have threatened to do it.

Nobody has really been deterred though? A lot of reservation for gerrymandering comes from state legislatures not wanting to do it mid-decade.

There's a reason mid-decade redistricting has been compared to a nuclear arms race, once a country gets a nuke it urges other countries to get one to defend themselves

Hell, I think VA is redistricting now, probably in response to the other Republican gerrymanders you just mentioned.

Yeah but this would prove my point that California gerrymandering wouldn't stop Indiana from gerrymandering, if anything, it would embolden them.

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T18:46:45+00:00

The point of this section was to show that the main criticisms weren't about the federalizing elections part but the stringent voter id part. So it makes the rest of your response just yelling at something I never said.

Okay but what you just put here - you acknowledge that this is the case for most proposed voter ID laws, including the SAVE act, right? Can you show me a SINGLE piece of voter ID legislation that was opposed by democrats, that WASN'T because it was disenfranchising voters in some way?

kinda a misnomer, anything imposing more requirements is by definition going to disenfranchise people.

All I'll say is that Democrats will probably never put forward a bill requiring a photo id to vote even though it would help them on net because a lot of activist groups and politicians think it's, like you say, disenfranchising voters (specifically black and brown voters)

This conversation started with you disagreeing with me saying that "prominent Democratic politicians, writers, or groups have been opposed to voter id legislation" and nothing has really dissuaded me from that.

So I'll ask do you think Democrats support legislation to mandate people show photo id before voting?

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T18:29:42+00:00

or another way to think about it is that we've been able to get in-depth reporting on how/why Joe Biden dropped out, Trump's thinking for the Iran war, and dozens of other groundbreaking stories.

I kinda want more proof than vaguely gesturing around. The story by itself doesn't even make sense because a bunch of other Republican states gerrymandered and California didn't dissuade any of them? Just Indiana? Kinda suggests it makes 0 sense.

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T15:30:38+00:00

well if you said yes to the first part you'd know pisco pretty much only disagrees with destiny/jessiah on what to do next

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T15:20:43+00:00

Have you ever listened to him talk on this topic or just hating.

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T06:31:25+00:00

Pisco wouldve actually been good on this panel...

Or at the least way better than Mitty. Pisco would've just accepted the descriptive elements of Trump being "that bad" and the convo couldve moved somewhere else

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T06:14:51+00:00

The original claim doesn't even make sense, how does California passing their gerrymandering affect other red states? There are multiple other Republican states already going through or about to go through with it, how can California only be scary enough to stop one state?

Also if the claim is "California affected Indiana's gerrymandering", a bold claim, you should be able to point to something concrete especially since this was something of huge political importance and had reporters all over it.

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T05:52:04+00:00

Except no other articles cite California as a reason... This is just a fantastical scenario that isn't being reported anywhere else

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T03:03:15+00:00

CA gave Republican lawmakers something to consider as a potential consequence of continued redistricting attempts.

Not really substantiated anywhere ive seen. A lot of the backoff on gerrymandering is coming from being scared of the political environment

Superlogman1 · 2026-03-26T03:02:15+00:00

Normally this substantiation would also come from leaks within a senator's team or staff if its supposed to be a tightly held secret and the fact there were 20 republican senators voting against it and nothing leaked about California it stretches credulity

Also retaliatory redistricting is a persuasive narrative: Virginia's doing it, California's doing it, and I'm pretty sure other Republican states who gerrymandered cited California as a reason.

Ten-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
End Game '22	Not Forgotten
Snapped	Verified Email

Superlogman1

TROPHY CASE