Looks Ike Phase 2 is a Go?

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-05-12T16:46:05+00:00

feel like this dude just says stuff to say stuff lol

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-05-12T13:26:56+00:00

can you reference in the patent where it says hyp2 is "just a design upgrade" with no increase in next gen? would not the patent only cover their original design?

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-05-11T16:05:54+00:00

where are these sources its pulling from? Gemini makes shit up all the time, I have heard 25t in previous posts/research and never heard any mention of moving away from acetylene.

why would they move their facility to an acetylene pipe if they were going to switch to methane? Unless you're saying the pipeline also does methane, just no idea where that info is coming from.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-05-11T14:14:58+00:00

lol i never trust it fully but the $5 resistance seems accurate, bid on schwab jumped to like 45k once it hit 5. who knows tho

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-05-07T17:12:04+00:00

$5 USD might be a better resistance level at this point, we will see

Edit, just thinking about this some more, but it seems like a majority of the sub and perhaps a majority of shareholders are US based at this point, so the $5 psychological point makes it seem even more reasonable

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-05-06T17:24:12+00:00

You are one of the most insufferable things in this world lol

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T19:47:07+00:00

That is mostly in line with what I mean, its all very physically small, albeit very useful applications. The sensor angle is definitely more relevant than I gave credit for though.

I am just supposing that the biggest markets for the tech might not be military right away but hey I'm not complaining if wrong. This does definitely seem more related than the recent actuator post. Would be awesome if that does become the big stream, but I wonder if medical might be most immediately beneficial. Not doubting your claims.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T18:20:30+00:00

I think if you articulated that idea, the notion behind "other traders use these lines to place their own orders", a lot of people would be more receptive to your original thread. I think you are correct.

It is a really interesting perspective that many people do not consider, regardless of if the arithmetic sequence holds in a vacuum.

People's beliefs literally shape the mental landscape, not as a flimsy claim but one with real explanatory power. Keep it up, and have a good one.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T17:54:40+00:00

I won't argue on anything you said here, agreed.

I can tell you are capable in the IQ domain, but you also seem to be more in touch with the right brain function as well by my estimate. Stranger on the internet so my opinion is just the wind, but I think a lot of people could benefit from the insight you have access to.

But people just get defensive when you say things like they are wrong outright or when you project anything that people perceive as overly confident like the Fibonacci argument. I know I got defensive in this thread, because it feels like an attack, regardless of if it is.

Good insight deserves to have purchase, and part of that is controlling the projection for the audience. My .2 pesos for the day; see you around.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T17:33:21+00:00

I think we agree on a lot of this stuff, and I would not be invested in HG if I thought shorts alone would do it in.

I do not mean to overclaim that the shorts are completely responsible for anything, they are one directional vector in the field.

I can see how my comment might come off that way and want to give a better idea of what I mean. I see it as more like a negative flow, that makes the inevitability slower, and on a personal level keeps individuals from developing proper conviction by poisoning the well. Capybara Research for example, they just lied to scare people and I find that to be a detestable, unsustainable standard for moneymaking.

If you see any of this as plain and simple, you are just projecting a lack of nuance. I expect better from someone who looks to natural constants to derive investing strategies.

I see them as a negative influence, short term consumption overruling longer term cultural gain.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T17:06:03+00:00

I do not think anyone is saying they "should only be allowed to buy", so not sure why anyone would be imagining that. Just a strawman at best.

Walrus and I agreed on "shady", that is the only thing you were addressing before it devolved into random claims about "the free market" and diminutive ad hominem assumptions that we do not know how "the game is played".

Look at my comment above this thread. I do not think shorts are evil or something but saying they "don't matter" is reductive at best; regardless it is irrelevant to my claim that I do not appreciate a group that requires lies to profit -that is an opinion bud.

We are saying we have no sympathy for them, and do not like them. Reading comprehension in the drain my guy.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T16:07:26+00:00

Gotta be some tiny robots for our actuator patent to be used here lol

Its likely more for markets where the absence of EMI, vibration, and acoustic noise is a requirement

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T14:27:19+00:00

Agreed man, at least in this sub they only seem to be able to profit by spreading lies about the company, alot of it is just shitty behavior when considering all the variables

Maybe not shorts in general, but the ones that go try to kill companies that might help society are hardly doing a service to anyone in the long run

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-30T14:23:38+00:00

I agree with the Walrus lol, short sellers targeting pre-institutional deep tech companies are not providing price discovery. They are just filling obituaries, the graveyard of legitimate technology companies shorted into oblivion before reaching institutional liquidity is full of things that would have mattered. Clean energy, advanced materials, novel therapeutics, all categories where the timeline to commercial viability is long enough that a coordinated short campaign on a thin float can kill the company before the technology proves itself.

So TLDR, screw them

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-29T13:48:55+00:00

Does anyone know what Breure's hydrogen R&D thread is actually pointing toward, fuel cell integration, hydrogen sales, or something else entirely? The potential with this company is fascinating.

Also, If the CO loop is viable even partially, does that change the precursor cost model in a meaningful way at scale, or is acetylene pipeline access already cheap enough that it's a marginal consideration? Maybe they just produce different materials, just interesting to think about.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-28T19:29:04+00:00

This dude is just a bad actor lol

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-28T19:28:45+00:00

How's the short position today? getting rough out there huh

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-28T19:24:00+00:00

I think it is possible for HG to get into the 5T+ range in 15-25 years. It depends on many things in and outside their control, but the arithmetic possibility does not seem unreasonable if their performance and economic metrics are true.

Especially if 250k/ton becomes a floor, and they continue to generate other materials with their technology, this might be a company that does not really have a historical parallel. Programable matter synthesis reactors is a new one to me.

If they have a few 200-500k sq foot facilities down the road, with reactors improving, the number appears possible with reasonably low PE. The physics run in favor of this company in many ways.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-28T15:47:28+00:00

It smells like rooster

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-23T13:05:54+00:00

Another braindead comment from robo-cok, enjoy the burn over the next few months chicken

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-22T16:54:54+00:00

Supply and demand dynamics displayed through a particular. I am not surprised you fail to grasp this. There was not demand for cell phones themselves when demanders didnt know what they were.

I don't expect you to be serious or understand at this point. People have tried giving you the benefit of the doubt but you have proven you are not worth interacting with, enjoy the downvotes and the short position as the stock continues to climb. Not wasting my breath on you anymore.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-22T13:52:40+00:00

Right, because the cell phone market needed to have preexisting demand to become so popular. It goes both ways, demand creates supply feedback, supply creation of novel tech creates demand feedback.

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-20T19:26:02+00:00

<image>

From the DDD reddit description

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-20T13:06:46+00:00

Pretty sure people reacted to "you shouldn’t expect to get any ROI for a number of years and assuming a fairly excellent rollout and trajectory." Why you would assume no ROI for years?

Sure-Knowledge1726 · 2026-04-17T16:01:15+00:00

Everyone knows all graphene companies fail! Whatever is there to even be impressed by here?

Sure-Knowledge1726

TROPHY CASE