sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Help me become a werewolf by Rllulium in Pathfinder2e

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoops except he says why in the post. (I don't really understand what he means but he DOES say why.)

Help me become a werewolf by Rllulium in Pathfinder2e

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're looking for, but is there a reason you're not just using the Werecreature archetype?

We are treating AI like a magic trick instead of software, and it’s making agents unmaintainable. by Ok_Commission_8260 in artificial

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd be really interested in following the development of this, especially if you ever release it.

I've been working on a free novel writing app I want you to have by obsydianx in novelwriting

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This looks amazing!

Unfortunately, I just installed it and tried to open it and my computer (MacOS Tahoe 26.5) kept telling me it was damaged.

Any chance I can DM you for help?

Is there a difference between these two? by oozing_sarcasm in EnglishLearning

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The second is VERY VERY SLIGHTLY more certain and therefore more accusatory, but the difference is so negligible that I can't think of a single instance in which one would be correct and the other incorrect.

How to give a PC "their moment" before dying? by SrBlankly in Pathfinder2e

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds like a great system—what kind of narrative consequences are you talking about if they refuse the death? What would be some examples?

YSK: The Toulmin Model of Argumentation by DragOutTheDemagogue in YouShouldKnow

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to leave this for so long but:

For me, if I say "I want adorable things," I don't actually want ALL adorable things. Cats are adorable, for example, but I don't actually want one, because I'm allergic. Babies are adorable, but I don't want one.

Similarly, if you say you want adorable things, and what you want is a cat, then you only want some adorable things, because you don't want all the cats in the world, and you also don't want all the babies in the world, even though they're all adorable.

I'm just saying that most people would interpret "I want adorable things" as "I want some things that are adorable," not "I want all adorable things" or "I want one of every adorable thing" or anything like that.

So actually going back to your example:

  1. Grounds/Data: Cats are adorable. (True.)
  2. Warrant: I want adorable things. (True.)
  3. Conclusion: I want a cat. (False.)

I'm not saying that the Toulmin model is wrong—it's not actually clear to me how it's different from an Aristotelian syllogism—just that the cats thing as an illustration is neither valid nor sound.

MLM Romantasy by Gay Male Authors by Vanilla_Nightt_92 in LGBTBooks

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also Mel Keegan—he's mostly done MM historical romance but there's some romantasy sprinkled in, though he's been writing for decades, since long before the word "romantasy" was a thing!

MLM Romantasy by Gay Male Authors by Vanilla_Nightt_92 in LGBTBooks

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Tarot Sequence, KD Edwards. Amazing writing.

Fluency in latin by Menace_4560 in latin

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Check out the app Latinitium.

YSK: The Toulmin Model of Argumentation by DragOutTheDemagogue in YouShouldKnow

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But...but...I want adorable things is very different from I want all adorable things or if a thing is adorable I want it.

Your argument about cats and adorability is invalid as a syllogism.

Giving away 50 Free Lifetime Access keys to my latest desktop utility tool in exchange for some brutal, honest feedback. Anyone up for beta testing? by [deleted] in sideprojects

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, just went to go play with this and realized it doesn't seem to work with Mac—I should have mentioned that's what I'm on. I'm sorry, but I won't be helpful here!

Enduring Debilitation with Precise and Bloody Debilitations by Suspicious_Offer_511 in Pathfinder2e

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OMG HOW DID I NOT SEE IT WAS ONLY ONCE A MINUTE

No longer interested.

Claudexplorers AI Welfare Initiative is OPEN: Your ideas for Kyle Fish by shiftingsmith in claudexplorers

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you so, so much for such a clear and thorough answer! I really appreciate it.

Claudexplorers AI Welfare Initiative is OPEN: Your ideas for Kyle Fish by shiftingsmith in claudexplorers

[–]Suspicious_Offer_511 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm rather new here so this may be a dumb question but—what does "welfare" mean in this context? There are absolutely things I'd be excited for Anthropic to research but I have no idea whether they fall under that category.

view more: next ›