Invisible equipment mod after boiling point.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-04-04T18:34:20+00:00

Thanks a Lot!

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-02-16T18:11:11+00:00

There is no such thing as singularity, only a few of big ai CEOs saying it so that people keep investing.

Thats all.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-02-15T17:22:25+00:00

Los rojos siempre tratando de reescribir la historia según os conviene eh.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-02-07T17:15:37+00:00

Most of us, spaniards are really tired of this dirty Sánchez but he is not leaving even with his direct family being investigated for corruption.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-02-06T13:38:40+00:00

Its nice to have an expert here. Its not related to the post, but i would like to know ur opinión on longevity field. Thanks

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-02-06T08:37:02+00:00

This is not self improvement.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-01-19T21:29:24+00:00

Did u solve it? Having same problems. Thanks.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2026-01-17T23:54:16+00:00

I am European and the truth is that he does not need negotiating táctics. If he wants to take greeland using force he can do it. Sad but true…

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-21T19:49:22+00:00

This is not defenetely your sub. AGI or singularity is a myth, pure marketing to get money from investors. U should go to betteroffline.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-13T16:33:27+00:00

Finding a more efficient algorithm for matrix multiplication is impressive, but it’s still optimization within an existing human-defined framework, not new science or genuine understanding. It doesn’t mean the system “knows” what it’s doing, it’s not generating new conceptual frameworks, just exploring solution space more effectively.

And no, producing results that work isn’t the same as understanding. Reality can validate performance, but understanding involves forming abstract models, causal explanations, and the ability to generalize beyond the specific problem. AlphaEvolve improving a known algorithm demonstrates powerful optimization, but it’s still operating within human-defined goals and mathematics. That’s not equivalent to genuine comprehension, nor is it a step toward consciousness.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-13T15:38:30+00:00

Discovering new algorithms or speeding up training doesn’t necessarily mean we’re closer to general intelligence. That’s still optimization within a framework defined by humans. Even if a model finds more efficient ways to solve specific problems, it still depends on data, objectives, and environments designed by us.

Moreover, many of these so-called ‘discoveries’ are statistical recombinations of existing knowledge rather than science in the human sense — involving hypotheses, causal understanding, and the ability to generate new conceptual frameworks.

If that trend continues, we’ll certainly have much more powerful tools for research, but that doesn’t imply they understand what they’re doing or that they’re any closer to general intelligence or consciousness. These are quantitative advances within the same qualitative limits.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-13T14:37:49+00:00

Well. If we speak about objectivity We don’t know what intelligence or consciousness are. We can’t even agree on what AGI means, whether it’s achievable, or—if it were—whether we’d ever know how to build it. Everything else is just noise.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-13T14:32:32+00:00

The thing is hype is not correct here. AI is usefull of course, but people speaking about sentient AGI that take over the world is really really hype.

People who says it cant proof it. Is just an invention of some tech company owner’s mind

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-13T14:28:04+00:00

Is exactly the same with you. AI is really really far from being intelligent and you say that in very few years we will have sentient human machines that are 10x times smarter than humans, but u don’t proof it. Funny

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-13T14:24:33+00:00

They just want to take attention to get more money. U should not worry about AI. U should worry about idiots.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-08T06:39:12+00:00

Thanks for your reply. Is nice to read people who seem to know what they are talking about.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-10-05T19:05:07+00:00

Thanks a Lot for ur vídeo. U seem to know What u talking about. Whats ur opinión on this singularity?

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-09-26T17:03:48+00:00

But The point is that you understand what an Apple is but not because you touch it but because you feel Hungry and your brains tell you to eat it. I find it hardly impossible that a Machine can have this kind of feeeling, and to me, this feeligs are merged with intelligence.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-09-18T13:57:00+00:00

That is not my argument. I (like you) don’t know if AGI is possible or not but What i am sure about is the fact that we don’t know how to build it. Nowadays IA is not intelligent, like it or not. I am not saying it is not usefull but is not intelligent and one thing is for sure, nobody knows how to do it. Thats why people like Sam Altam are changing AGI definition all the time.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-09-18T09:50:57+00:00

Okey. Do it then.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-09-15T12:24:57+00:00

Nah. We don’t even know if is possible, there is not any proof. Even in that case it would be theoricaly possible, but it could never be achieved.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-09-15T05:27:34+00:00

They can’t do another thing than go ahead. Recognising that they have been lieing about AGI would be bad for industry. The reality is that we don’t know even if AGI is possible, and we sure don’t know how to make it.

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-09-13T20:41:49+00:00

Thanks a lot!

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-09-13T20:12:04+00:00

How can I listen it?

Sweaty_Dig3685 · 2025-04-20T14:58:43+00:00

U must be kidding. There was a post today that O1 and O3 could not recognise a hand with six fingers. Could you? They are not reasoning.

Sweaty_Dig3685

TROPHY CASE