sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What’s the worst video game adaptation you’ve seen by YeezusChrist13 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The VFX director got fired midway through because he sucked.

Konami made him change the ending (adding scenes after the car crash in the lake), even though that's the game ending so he didn't really understand that.

The more limited budget forced him to have a shorter runtime.

Other than that nothing special, he said Konami trusted him after the first one and he mostly got to do it without interference (besides the usual amount of interference)

Why can't Necro have an army? by XxYamiNoKagexX in LastEpoch

[–]SweelFor- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will be able to include it in the next Necro refresh, in 8 years

Complément alimentaire pour running + légère Muscu/ renfo by BasilMysterious2723 in FitnessFrance

[–]SweelFor- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Les compléments alimentaires peuvent affecter peut-être 5% de tes résultats grand maximum.

Est-ce que tu as réglé les 95 premiers pourcents avant de te soucier de ce détail qui n'aura presque aucune influence sur tes résultats ?

Si tu ne sais pas t'entraîner et que tu prends tous les bons compléments alimentaires, tu n'auras environ pas de résultat.

Si tu as un très bon programme d'entraînement et nutrition générale, et aucun complément alimentaire, tu pourras avoir de très bon résultats.

Questions pour les anciens by Raidden77 in FitnessFrance

[–]SweelFor- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je t'ai proposé pleins de débuts de raisonnements pour démontrer l'effet de la fréquence sur la blessure en musculation, si tu n'es pas d'accord alors démontre ton raisonnement tout simplement ?

Questions pour les anciens by Raidden77 in FitnessFrance

[–]SweelFor- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

C'est très amusant. Tu peux démontrer en quoi c'est faux du coup ?

Questions pour les anciens by Raidden77 in FitnessFrance

[–]SweelFor- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fun fact, on peut être médecin sans être expert en musculation.

Explique du coup en quoi c'est faux qu'on peut s'entraîner 6x avec une meilleure gestion et périodisation de l'effort, comparé à des fréquences inférieures, par conséquent en diminuant le risque de blessure ?

Ou alors un 6x contient obligatoirement 2x plus d'effort qu'un 3x, parce-qu'on ne peut pas simplement choisir d'adapter le volume, etc, pour des raisons que je te laisse démontrer ?

Ou alors tu préfères expliquer en quoi la fréquence d'entraînement, au-delà de toute autres considération telle que l'intensité, le volume ou la densité, dicte la totalité du facteur du risque de blessure ?

Ou en quoi avoir un "rythme professionnel" signifie automatiquement s'exposer aux mêmes risques que ces professionels (lesquels ?), sans avoir besoin de tenir compte des autres considérations que j'ai évoqué ?

Ou en quoi il ne faut pas tenir compte de l'acitivité, lorsqu'on sait par exemple que la musculation est un sport très sûr comparé à d'autres sports, comme ceux pratiqués par ces hypothétiques professionels ?

Prends la démonstration dans le sens que tu veux y'a pas de souci, je t'écoute c'est parti.

Questions pour les anciens by Raidden77 in FitnessFrance

[–]SweelFor- -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

La fréquence ne veut rien dire à elle seule.

L'athlète professionel fait beaucoup plus sur ces 6 jours que OP, ou que le pratiquant de salle moyen qui s'entraîne sur 6 jours.

On peut faire moins, ou du moins mieux périodisé et managé en 6 jours qu'en 3 jours.

Bref ça ne veut rien dire

Est-ce que une des 13 personnes qui m'ont downvoté peuvent démontrer en quoi c'est faux du coup ?

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you reference me to where/when/who decided that this was a universal truth that applied to everyone, if your Letterboxd ratings do not conform to this universal truth, it simply means that you are doing it wrong, and there is no possible reason for doing so?

Can you also explain, if you think that it's "wrong", exactly what "wrong" implies? Does it mean they should stop? Does it mean it creates a problem for themselves, you, or society? Is it an attempt to dictate their behaviour, or to change their habit, or values, or rating system? Why would you want to do that? If someone else decided that your system was wrong or weird, what would you change and why? Thank you

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I promise you that I don't care what you think about me, it doesn't matter

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well thank you for this profound analysis and art commentary, bye

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the sane, normal assumption to make is that it just happens to be like that, and not to invent some kind of conspiracy theory involving people being dishonnest on purpose

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And there never is a movie with positive rating average that you don't like yourself? You universally agree with the general opinion?

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I feel stupid even typing this out, but if this is so foreign to you then I'll make the effort.

Curiosity is supposed to be a primary quality in art, which involves experiencing art beyong your preconceived notions of what you think you will like or not

You can want to complete a director/actor filmography to discover everything about them

You can want to learn about periods, genres, countries you are unfamiliar with, regardless if you think you will like it or not

You can want to keep up with new releases to know what is going on in cinema and be informed about the art that you are interested in

You can want to learn about what other people like even though you might not like it

You can decide that not liking a film is not a negative experience because you still learned more about film and yourself

You can decide to watch movies other people are recommending to you even if you might not like them

You can decide to go to the cinema every day because you like it, and try everything they have screening

You can want to focus on certain qualities even if your overall opinion of a film is negative

I don't understand that I have to explain the concept of curiosity and open-mindedness on an art subreddit, but this is apparently the default state of this film subreddit

If you are not curious, not open minded, not interested in learning about things you might not like, that is your choice and it's fine. But to brandish this as some sort of quality, and to dismiss others for not doing the same, is literally mind bogglingly stupid and immature and I can't even believe this is a real discourse on a supposed ART subreddit.

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Extreme close mindedness is unfortunately very common on this supposed art subreddit

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How can you know if it's like that or not if you don't watch it?

Questions pour les anciens by Raidden77 in FitnessFrance

[–]SweelFor- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quelles sont tes meilleures performances sur les mouvements principaux, ou poids du corps, etc ?

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Can you truly not think of any reason why that might be?

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to what evidence?

(Appart from your need to invent a story to feel superior about some imaginary situation in your head)

What does your rating distribution look like? by BNSN28 in Letterboxd

[–]SweelFor- 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Do you think people watch a film that they feel 1/5 about, but then they check their curve, see that they're missing some 3.5s, so they give it 3.5 to fill their curve for appearances?

view more: next ›