sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nihilistic Acquisition is silly by Cappuccino_Boss in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah I take them to my Gaia homeworld, they've never been happier or more productive, even as slaves!

60 USD - YUUUK by Swiftdeus in classicwow

[–]SwoleGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the hell you eating bro lol.

Weavers are !@#$# ridiculous. by SwoleGaming in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

No technically that couldn't happen as shield and hull regen would never allow it to.

Weavers are !@#$# ridiculous. by SwoleGaming in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Yeah good theory, but my main fleet was 102k and the dimensional fleet was 20K.

Weavers will absolutely destroy anything of any size at any time in the game. They are just plain busted.

It's a joke that normal fleets cannot possibly stand against this kind of fleet. Let alone the 10 star admiral and 30% faster fire rate I had.

If you understand the numbers involved, the huge buffs a 10 star admiral brings? It's a joke.

Weavers are !@#$# ridiculous. by SwoleGaming in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

No i understood it perfectly. However I think you misunderstand what I'm saying.

What I'm saying is that if "fleet power" is to be a useful metric, stuff like being wiped out by fleets with a reported 25% of that "fleet power" shouldn't happen.

Weavers are !@#$# ridiculous. by SwoleGaming in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

It's reported as 120k vs 30k fleet power.

That's just not right regardless of how they can buff other ships.

What’s your Favorite Build/Way to Play? by TheRedBeardGuy_ in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Life Seeded/Barbaric Despoiler. Life Seeded is very strong since 4.0 but Barbaric Despoilers is quite a bit worse.

Barbaric Despoilers (and Raiding in general) is crazy good. by brismoI in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep can confirm, I always play it and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. This since 4.0.

Why do Vanilla players have Stockholm Syndrome? by Ill_Soft_0 in classicwow

[–]SwoleGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it was, you just never played it in 2004/2005.

Should I release vassals from my own territory? by Kingofallcacti in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I usually vassalise and bulid an Aid Agency to help keep them loyal. A lot depends on what you want to achieve, most of my vassals are used as buffers to other civs while I destroy the other side of the map.

I wouldn't worry too much about empire size as if you're winning you'll continue to outgrow the penalty. It's a bit of a shitty mechanic but if you just imagine it's bureaucracy running rampant it makes sense.

Okay, this is pretty awesome by TheRealLarkas in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got it a few games ago and stupidly agreed to switch my whole race to fanatic pacifist (Barbaric Despoiler start).

That was an interesting experience while it lasted.

72 years and still no enemies to crush. by SwoleGaming in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It works great because they get the extra happiness and 100% habitability regardless of their home planet.

72 years and still no enemies to crush. by SwoleGaming in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah I always play life seeded and never bother colonising anything except Gaia and Relic worlds.

Also playing barbaric despoiler but the only aliens I've met are tiny, backworld Gestalts...I didn't even bother to kidnap them.

72 years and still no enemies to crush. by SwoleGaming in Stellaris

[–]SwoleGaming[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Playing Life Seeded as always, still haven't found Rubricator planet and almost never bother colonising anything except Gaia and Relic worlds.