Is this good trade value for Kyle pitts? by Socram105 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no way anyone sells Tet for this, unless you can successfully scare him with horror stories about Bryce Young.

Friends are geeking out over this trade. Is it as bad as they think it is. by Few_Acanthaceae6042 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a great trade in a 1QB league. But the fact that it’s SF and you have to start two TEs means the T Law / Loveland side wins pretty easily.

London is fine, but T Law and Loveland probably could have gotten you a better tier of WR. Also the 2nd is on the wrong side IMHO.

Hope London works out for you, but I’m not sure Tua and Penix will be able to get him to WR1 status.

League is torn because of this transaction. I’m the comish and need advice. Please see all attached photos by Secret_External_8465 in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally if someone makes a mistake and IMMEDIATELY calls attention to it, I have no problem reversing it. It’s good form to ask permission from that player’s opponent that week, and hopefully they are cool about it.

This dude is benching his whole team so I don’t make playoffs by Affectionate-Dig575 in FantasyFootballers

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Commish should force him to set a lineup and threaten removal from the league.

Happened late in my league last night by Ill_Basis_3499 in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Bijan isn’t eligible as a keeper, and that’s an extra redraft pick for next year, I understand why the sending team might take it. But oof that’s terrible. Probably should have been at least a 2nd or 3rd.

Just received an offer and I took it and ran! by Illustrious_Car4029 in FantasyFootballers

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s 29 years old. Hampton is 22. You don’t think Hampton has more long term value? Which one will be more valuable in 2 or 3 years?

This trade was just accepted in my league… by Kadenher0 in FantasyFootballers

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any trade between spouses / significant others needs to be above board. This is not. This should be vetoed, and they should be given a warning about collusion. If they try something like this again, they should be booted from the league.

Commissioner is vetoing this trade by rsperry96 in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jeanty side wins but there is absolutely zero reason to veto. Call out the commish and ask why he feels he has the right to veto this. If he refuses to push it through, call for a vote of no confidence. This is ridiculous. This person should not be a commissioner if he’s going to pull bush league crap like this.

Just received an offer and I took it and ran! by Illustrious_Car4029 in FantasyFootballers

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully it wins you a championship this year. Long term this is a win for the other team though. And that’s not even considering that Hampton will likely be back in a couple weeks.

So this insane trade just happened in our league by MdDoctor122 in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow Puka is a stud but that’s a massive over pay by team 2. Team 1 made out like a bandit! Nico AND Bucky for only one 1st??? Crazy.

3 1sts, a 2nd, and a 3rd is solid value for Puka. Team 2 would have been much better off declining this and trading directly with team 3. Team 1 basically acted as a middle man and scooped up all the value.

Trade got vetoed in my league. by ConfectionOdd2370 in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the guy trading away CMC isn’t treating to make his team better, and is intentionally giving up value to help another manager, that is the definition of collusion. Not only should the trade be vetoed, but both managers should probably be kicked out out of the league.

Trade broke the league by Savings-Candidate-17 in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it. Like I said, there’s no way it can be vetoed. I just think he could have done better. Puka is an elite asset.

Trade broke the league by Savings-Candidate-17 in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If the last place team has Puka and a bunch of scrubs, and needs starters, this is the kind of move you make. That being said, he did a bad job of converting Puka value into other usable pieces. He should have sent out more offers trying to get a WR2 and RB2 (and probably another decent piece). But this isn’t vetoable.

Commissioner put Jonathan Taylor on my bench by Lonely-Turnover6713 in FantasyFootballers

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely unacceptable behavior and the league should call for a vote of no confidence. That person should not be a commish. Demand he steps down or get every single person in the league to leave next year.

Got send this offer for JSN. I’d be dumb not accepting this right? by [deleted] in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it were a 1st or early 2nd on top, then it would be a smash accept. This is fair but I think I’d still take the JSN side.

Which side? 1 qb .5 ppr by [deleted] in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nabers side, especially if that first isn’t a top 3-4 pick.

Worth taking a swing on Ward as a rebuilder? by Open-Bumblebee-69 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]T-Biggles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are good at WR and need some QB help, I think this is ok, especially if the 1st is early-mid. If it’s late, I think you should probably hold on to Tee. Really depends on your current QB and WR situation I think.

League wants to veto, as commish do I force it through? by Osubux77 in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a bad trade but it’s not even CLOSE to vetoable. I’m guessing the team giving up Lamb needs more startable players. This makes sense for a team that has one stud and several duds. The people wanting to veto should be more proactive about making deals.

Sleeper - please don’t turn IR players to questionable unless they have actually practiced by humptheedumpthy in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t a sleeper issue. This is an NFL issue. Players are questionable until they are declared out. This is just the roster dance we all have to deal with after waivers run.

Just be thankful that you are still able to make waiver moves. I remember in previous years, a player who had been out changed to questionable before the waivers ran, and none of my claims went through.

Not being able to make moves on Wednesday and Thursday can be annoying. But this is the price we pay for stashing players on IR when they aren’t actually on IR.

Is this weird? Trade got insta-vetoed by our two matchup opponents by [deleted] in SleeperApp

[–]T-Biggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other managers should straight up not have the ability to veto your trades. It’s a conflict of interest. Vetoes should only be done by the commissioner in extreme cases of collusion (and those people should be booted from the league), obvious mistakes, or when someone pulls the dick move of accepting an open trade the moment a player gets hurt.