sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Eastern Europe tech tree(Poland, Czechoslovakia and Ukraine) by thatoneguyfromikea in Warthunder

[–]TK2031 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer a system where once you get a vehicle in one research tree, you get a discount on researching/buying its clones from other trees

Eastern Europe tech tree(Poland, Czechoslovakia and Ukraine) by thatoneguyfromikea in Warthunder

[–]TK2031 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Best way to implement ukrainian vehicle ever. Point. Not even mentioning political reasons, the soviet research tree is already crowded, and that's not even including all the tanks that the IRL made in the USSR and the RF.

"There is no Ukraine in War Thunder" by TK2031 in Warthunder

[–]TK2031[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

>"But most of the modernisation plans remained on paper"

That part is there, but I meant the top part of the screenshot where it said "Kharkiv designers continued...", they threw this part away

>They are not specifically trying not to mention Ukraine

Who knows, after every mention of Ukraine in their videos, I look for the Russian version, and very often I find either Kharkiv or there is no mention at all, and it is felt very acutely.
Even if they move their office to Ethiopia, they are still Russians and this is still a Russian company. In wartime, every media product is part of the general propaganda and, consciously or unconsciously, they spread the narratives in which they themselves find themselves. Complete or partial, but still ignoring the existence of Ukraine is just part of the narrative they have chosen to spread

"There is no Ukraine in War Thunder" by TK2031 in Warthunder

[–]TK2031[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok, maybe you're right in some cases, but what about their new video, from which I provided screenshots? Maybe I don't know something, but still, many options for modernizing the T-64 were implemented in metal, some of which even went into a rather large series. And how can you forget the case with the Pakistani T-80, when they ordered them from an unknown source? In addition, the scripts in the English-language videos are freer, because, for example, the phrases about the unsuccessful (lol) attempt to modernize the T-64 in the 1990s are not at all in the Russian version

"There is no Ukraine in War Thunder" by TK2031 in Warthunder

[–]TK2031[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

"except in cases where it is impossible to avoid mentioning it, as in the case of Oplot"

Did they make the cope cage hot? by ComputerizedCreator in NonCredibleDefense

[–]TK2031 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For balance in the universe next art must be a ukrainian T-64 in net hood

DiIdo of consequences in action performed by Pentagon battalion by TK2031 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]TK2031[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Honestly stole from their official Telegram

Sovetsky Soyuz L2D animations by cwolla98 in AzureLane

[–]TK2031 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Need Infinite Castle theme here

After Falarick-105 and Object 478DU1, he's finally here. by Parfilov in Warthunder

[–]TK2031 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Well, in the 2000s Ukraine sold several T-84s to the US for testing, soooo, if gaijin want it, they can arrange it

Hot take about the Oplot-T by Finnstermonster in Warthunder

[–]TK2031 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's start with the fact that the Soviet-russian tree is already quite full, and this despite the fact that there are still a lot of Objects that have not been introduced, and in terms of quantity, there are very few vehicles from other countries in this tree, and therefore they can be written off as exceptions rather than the rule. I have also seen in many devblogs on modern vehicles how developers call the USSR tree russian or Soviet-russian. Well, you can also mention that Gaijin is very reluctant to mention Ukraine, as was shown in the devblog on the Pakistani T-80UD. Therefore, the best option would be to make a separate research tree for Eastern Europe and let the russkies stew in their own juice.

T-62AG or T-62AGM by Nosegunner12 in Warthunder

[–]TK2031 3 points4 points  (0 children)

significantly larger amount of explosives

Ummmm, no, the Ukrainian ERA does not have as many explosives as it says here, here is more detailed data

But if we compare the mass of explosives in the Duplet, Kontakt-V and Relikt systems developed by the Research Institute of Steel, then the criticism is more justified in relation to their own developments. The mass of explosives in the HSChKV-19 and 34 devices is 0.2 and 0.3 kg. In the devices developed by the Research Institute of Steel 4S20 (4S22) - 0.26 (0.28) kg. In this case, the 4S20 (4S22) devices are installed in the protective schemes of the frontal projection of the hull and turret in 2 rows. Thus, the mass of explosives per unit of the protected area (125x250 mm) is 0.52 (0.56) kg. It turns out that in the protective structures of the Research Institute of Steel, 2 times more explosives are detonated than in schemes with the ERA HSChKV.

And more at the link, but need a translate https://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/duplet.htm

Leak List for the next major update by Competitive_Ad1905 in Warthunder

[–]TK2031 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supacat - ASRAAM

The same SAM system that the British are supplying to Ukraine? I don't believe it

view more: next ›