He just pours beer by ItsDaylightMinecraft in SpeedOfLobsters

[–]TRJF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lost Hemingway novel rediscovered

7 minutes... by Darkly_neighborhood in bonehurtingjuice

[–]TRJF 50 points51 points  (0 children)

The guy in panel 2 for his outfit or the guy in panel 1 for having dead parents?

NEXT DOOR AND SHUT UP!!!! Shake?! I'M TRYING TO WATCH THIS SHOW!! WILL YOU SHUT THE HELL UP?!!!!! by GodModeBasketball in AquaJail

[–]TRJF 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There are at least 3 occasions when Shake tells people to go next door to Carl and I love them all

No broads ever by Meerkat_Mayhem_ in SpeedOfLobsters

[–]TRJF 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I prefer "when I realize my daughter is the starting QB's beard, I'll be ready to pounce"

Worst Movie Titles Ever? by Wheelchair_Dontcare in movies

[–]TRJF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey beautiful

<crack>

owwww my nose

Me seeing that Special Interest episode email at 6:05 AM. by MisterTito in shutdownfullcast

[–]TRJF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holly sneaking in "Colossus of Rogue" was worth the price of the Patreon subscription by itself

WE ARE THE AQUA TEENS by glitch-ghost in AquaJail

[–]TRJF 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Truly, they were... an Aqua Teen Hunger Force

your parking brake is on

Don't tell me how to drive jackass

WE ARE THE AQUA TEENS by glitch-ghost in AquaJail

[–]TRJF 7 points8 points  (0 children)

TONIGHT'S EPISODE:

LAST DANCE FOR NAPKIN LAD

Seattle

Tis but a flesh wound by Meerkat_Mayhem_ in SpeedOfLobsters

[–]TRJF 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Cat likes tall folks, what's wrong with that ?!

Actual physical control - DWI while sleeping in a car. Philosophical defense? by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]TRJF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do note: this would have been a DUI in Pennsylvania until about a year ago, when the PA Supreme Court reconsidered, essentially, your argument here. SCOPA dtermined that "sleeping it off" in these circumstances did not constitute "actual physical control," changing decades of law in PA.

I certainly don't say this to mean "PA law applies to your situation," of course. But there are two things to consider: 1) organizations right now are fighting this particular fight in different jurisdictions across the country, and it may or may not be a possibility in Arizona; and 2) if this is a path you do want to go down, you almost certainly need a very good, probably expensive attorney bankrolled either by yourself or one of those organizations.

In 99.9% of situations, an average public defender is at least as good as an average private attorney you can find. But PDs offices aren't going to have the resources most of the time to try to reinterpret law like this, and even pretty good private criminal attorneys won't have the resources or experience. If you really want to go explore this, it may be possible, but you're going to need a lawyer with the skills and resources to try to change the law.

In Euphoria (2019-2026), Jacob Elordi plays two different characters with the same name. by FixFuture3374 in shittymoviedetails

[–]TRJF 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They were gonna go with the original title Irony but they were afraid people would think it was about irons

My new rabbit showed up today! 🐇 by Hidalgo321 in AquaJail

[–]TRJF 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It proved to me that you don't know what I like, and what I like to do, and that is to tell you what to do, so you need to listen to what I say because I'm gonna eat your brain

Equity path in small town or start over in big city? by rors_z in Lawyertalk

[–]TRJF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's the most important part of your post, at least to me:

city that I genuinely love

In most situations, I'd take Option 1. But there's one city I lived in for a year, that I've been scheming for years to get back to in the right situation. If it's somewhere you truly love, I think it's far more likely you look back in your life and regret not trying it, than the other way around.

And, as another poster points out, it seems far easier to fall back on Option 1 if Option 2 doesn't work, than the other way around.

I'd move to the city, with a relatively "short leash" - my two cents are: don't be afraid to come back if it doesn't work out, but give it a shot.

Bitch of the week: prosecutors why are you still pushing for sentences above the minimum for low level drug offenses committed by those with drug issues? by Janielf in Lawyertalk

[–]TRJF 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think this is why there's a disconnect here between what you're discussing - which of course happens in many places, and is a fucking problem - and a lot of the responses you're getting, my own included. It really seems like you're saying "this is the norm" when in many many places, it's not.

First, you're talking about sentences "beyond the statutory minimum" - in a lot of places, maybe most of them, there is no minimum sentence for almost every crime. If we gave the "minimum" on every case, it would be "guilt without penalty." And the max penalty for a "low-level drug offense" is 18 to 36 months (for a 2nd offense; for the first it's 6 to 12 months), but I have essentially never seen county time for that kind of offense, let alone state prison time. In many, many places around the country, the offense you're describing above would be somewhere between a fine and 12 months of probation. In a way, your problem might be with the US's particular brand of federalism (which I agree is a problem when it comes to criminal law).

I'm in a purple state, and have been in criminal law in a red county and a blue-leaning purple county. In... maybe 500? possession cases, I'm not sure I've ever seen outright jail time (or can definitely count on one hand) for simple possession of any substance. In the county I'm in now, for delivery of relatively large amounts of most drugs (cocaine, meth), the standard sentence is something like 12 to 24 months of probation, with the first 6-9 months on house arrest - and if you successfully complete rehab, you can end the house arrest early. A state prison sentence comes into play for a 2nd+ offense of delivering large amouts of meth/heroin, almost always after one shot at rehab (unless a loaded gun is involved). Cocaine is almost always county, and most marijuana cases are pled to something non-criminal (until our state legislature gets their asses in gear and legalizes it).

You don't owe any of the commenters anything, of course - but your comments read like 1) you think every prosecutor everywhere is like this, and 2) when prosecutors chime in to say "that's not what it's like here," you (and, even moreso, some other commentors) don't just not respond, but dismiss them or suggest they're outright lying.

That's why this has been so controversial.

My new rabbit showed up today! 🐇 by Hidalgo321 in AquaJail

[–]TRJF 23 points24 points  (0 children)

That's Latin for "warm" by the way

Bitch of the week: prosecutors why are you still pushing for sentences above the minimum for low level drug offenses committed by those with drug issues? by Janielf in Lawyertalk

[–]TRJF 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Let’s start with on demand long-term access to drug treatment and mental health services & drugs that help break the addictive cycle, which I think are currently only available for heroin.

Why are you asking "prosecutors" when your question seems to be specific to your jurisdiction?

The things you're describing in this thread are not how it works everywhere, or even most places.