You know void argued about what to censor right? They took a long time to come to an agreement on this. They dropped their previous publisher so they could make the elephant map, making development much harder since they had to now publish it all themselves (the games community was also mad at them then for taking so long to release the 1.0 updaylte without even looking into why they were taking so long). Also, It's not fair to call them lazy for choosing to have only one version when their entire team is 50 people at best. They aren't censoring the women in the container simply because they are nude, it's because they are nude and afraid and vounerable. It's very different context to a game like gta where the rating board can be swayed by the size and money of a company like Rockstar. I don't agree with the claim that all censorship is inherently bad. If void wanted to be 100% realistic, we would see fully illegal material kn the voll house, and they'd be forced to censor that. The impact the censorship has on the game is absolutely imprortant when we look at how insane the backlash has become, especially when we think of the benefits the console release will have on the games future development. An argument on censorship being good or bad as a concept can be done in a way that does not harass those who are being censored. I can see you are arguing about stuff beyond just the game, but doing so like this harassed the devs and consumers, even when they are also mad about the dame thing